Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 70-105

  Golonka, Ewa M ^a   Bowles, Anita R ^a   Frank, Victor M ^a,b   Richardson, Dorna L ^c   Freynik, Suzanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b American Councils for International Education   (United States)

^c ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

CALL; foreign language; mobile; technology; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890419944     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2012.700315     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Abdous, M.h., Camarena, M.M. and Facer, B.R. 2009. MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21 (1): 76-95.
2. Abrams, Z.I. 2003. The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in Germ. Modern Language Journal, 87: 157-167.
3. Al-Seghayer, K. 2001. The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5 (1): 202-232.
4. Ariew, R. and Ercetin, G. 2004. Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17: 237-259.
5. Armstrong, K. and Retterer, O. 2008. Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16: 233-251.
6. Aust, R., Kelley, M. and Roby, W. 1993. The use of hyper-reference and conventional dictionaries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41: 63-73.
7. Bernardini, S. 2004. " Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments ". In How to use corpora in language teaching, Edited by: Sinclair, J. 15-38. Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
8. Blackburn, J.L. and Hakel, M.D. 2006. " Enhancing self-regulation and goal orientation with ePortfolios ". In Handbook of on ePortfolios, Edited by: Jafari, A. and Kauman, C. 83-89. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
9. Blake, W.C. 2009. Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. Modern Language Journal, 93: 227-240.
10. Burston, J. 2001. Computer-based grammar checker and self-monitoring. CALICO Journal, 18: 499-515.
11. Carey, S. 1999. The use of webCT for a highly interactive virtual graduate seminar. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12: 371-380.
12. Carey, M. 2004. CALL visual feedback for the pronunciation of vowels. CALICO Journal, 21: 571-601.
13. Chang, Y., Wu, C. and Ku, H. 2004. The introduction of electronic porfolios to teach and assess English as a Foreign Language in Taiwan. TechTrends, 49 (1): 30-35.
14. Chappelle, C. 1997. CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms?. Language Learning & Technology, 1: 19-43.
15. Chen, W.C. 2008. Noticing in text-based computer-mediated communication: A study of task-based telecommunication between native and nonnative English speakers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UMI 3333633, Texas A&M
16. Chen, C.M. and Chung, C.J. 2008. Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51: 624-645.
17. Chen, C.M. and Hsu, S.H. 2008. Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11: 153-180.
18. Cheng, G. 2008-2009. Implementation challenges of the English language ePortfolio system from various stakeholder perspectives. Educational Technology Systems, 37 (1): 97-118.
19. Chiu, T.-L., Liou, H.-C. and Yeh, Y. 2007. A study of web-based oral activities enhanced by automatic speech recognition for EFL college learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20: 209-233.
20. Chun, D. 2001. L2 reading on the web: Strategies for accessing information in hypermedia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14: 367-403.
21. Chun, D. and Plass, J.L. 1996. Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80: 183-198.
22. Comas-Quinn, A. and Mardomingo, R. 2009. Mobile blogs in language learning: Making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL, 21 (1): 96-112.
23. Davis, J.F. and Lyman-Hager, M. 1997. Computers and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30 (1): 58-72.
24. de Freitas, S. 2006. Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning, Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee.
25. Debski, R. 2002. " Technology and second language learning through socialization ". In Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices, Edited by: Naidu, S. 129-146. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
26. deHaan, J., Reed, W.M. and Kuwada, K. 2010. The effect of interactivity with a music video game on second language vocabulary recall. Language Learning and Technology, 14: 74-94.
27. Dodigovic, M. 2007. Artificial intelligence and second language learning: An efficient approach to error remediation. Language Awareness, 16: 99-113.
28. Ducate, L.C. and Lomicka, L.L. 2005. Exploring the blogosphere: Use of web logs in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 38: 410-421.
29. Ducate, L.C. and Lomicka, L.L. 2008. Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21: 9-28.
30. Farr, F. 2008. Evaluating the use of corpus-based instruction in a language teacher education context: Perspectives from the users. Language Awareness, 93 (i): 61-78.
31. Felix, U. 2005. Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research-Toward a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (1-2): 1-32.
32. Gettys, S., Imhof, L.A. and Kautz, J.O. 2001. Computer assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34: 91-106.
33. Gilgen, R. 2005. Holding the world in your hand: Creating a mobile language learning environment. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 3: 30-39.
34. Grace, C. 2000. Gender differences: Vocabulary retention and access to translations for beginning language learners in CALL. Modern Language Journal, 84: 214-224.
35. Gray, L. 2008. Effective practice with e-Portfolios, Bristol, UK: JISC Innovation Group.
36. Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R. and Tomkins, S.-A. 2005. The pros and cons of interactive whiteboards in relation to the key stage 3 strategy and framework. Language Learning Journal, 32: 38-44.
37. Hardison, D.M. 2004. Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8: 34-52.
38. Harless, W.G., Zier, M.A. and Duncan, R.C. 1999. Virtual dialogues with native speakers: The evaluation of an interactive multimedia method. CALICO Journal, 16: 313-337.
39. Heift, T. and Schulze, M. 2007. Errors and intelligence in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Parsers and pedagogues, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
40. Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G. and Miller, D. 2007. Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32: 213-225.
41. Hirata, Y. 2004. Computer assisted pronunciation training for native English speakers learning Japanese pitch and durational contrasts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17: 357-376.
42. Holland, V.M., Kaplan, J.D. and Sabol, M.A. 1999. Preliminary tests of language learning in a speech-interactive graphics microworld. CALICO Journal, 16: 339-359.
43. Hong, W. 1997. Multimedia computer-assisted reading in business Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 30: 335-344.
44. Hubbard, P. 2005. A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18: 351-368.
45. Ioannou, A. and Artino, A. Incorporating Wikis in an educational technology course: Ideas, reflections and lessons learned. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) International Conference.
46. Jacobs, D. and Rogers, C. 1999. Treacherous allies: Foreign language grammar checkers. CALICO Journal, 16: 509-531.
47. Kennedy, C. and Miceli, T. 2001. An evaluation of intermediate students' approaches to corpus investigation. Language Learning & Technology, 5: 77-90.
48. Kern, R.G. 1995. Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79: 457-476.
49. Kessler, G. 2009. Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning and Technology, 13 (1): 79-95.
50. Kessler, G. and Bikowski, D. 2010. Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25 (1): 41-58.
51. Kiernan, P.J. and Aizawa, K. 2004. Cell phones in task based learning: Are cell phones useful language learning tools?. ReCALL, 16: 71-84.
52. Kim, I.S. 2006. Automatic speech recognition: Reliability and pedagogical implications for teaching pronunciation. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1): 322-334.
53. Kitade, K. 2000. L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. CALL, 13: 143-166.
54. Kitade, K. 2008. The role of offline metalanguage talk in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 12 (1): 64-84.
55. Knight, S. 1994. Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students with different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal, 78: 285-299.
56. Kocoglu, Z. 2008. Turkish EFL student teachers' perceptions on the role of electronic portfolios in their professional development. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7: ISSN: 1303-6521
57. Kost, C., Foss, P. and Lenzini, J. 1999. Textual and pictorial glosses: Effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32 (1): 89-97.
58. Koyama, T. and Takeuchi, O. 2004. Comparing electronic and printed dictionaries: How the difference affected EFL learning. JACET Bulletin, 38: 33-46.
59. Koyama, T. and Takeuchi, O. 2007. Does look-up frequency help reading comprehension of EFL learners? Two empirical studies of electronic dictionaries. CALICO Journal, 25 (1): 110-125.
60. Kvavik, R. 2005. " Convenience, communications and control: How students use technology ". In Educating the net generation, Edited by: D.G., Oblinger and J.L., Oblinger. Boulder: CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
61. Lai, C. and Zhao, Y. 2006. Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10: 102-120.
62. Lan, Y.J., Sung, Y.T. and Chang, K.E. 2007. A mobile device supported peer assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning and Technology, 11: 130-151.
63. Laufer, B. and Hill, M. 2000. What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 3: 58-76.
64. Laufer, B. and Levitsky-Aviad, T. 2006. Examining the effectiveness of "Bilingual Dictionary Plus"-A dictionary for production in a foreign language. International Journal of Lexicography, 19: 135-155.
65. Lee, L. 2008. Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning and Technology, 12: 53-72.
66. Lee, L. 2010. Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27: 260-276.
67. Leech, G. 1997. Teaching and language corpora, London: Longman.
68. Leffa, V. 1993. Using an electronic dictionary to understand foreign language texts. Trabalhos em linguistica aplicada, 21: 19-29.
69. Lenders, O. 2008. Electronic glossing-Is it worth the effort?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21: 457-481.
70. Levy, M. and Stockwell, G. 2006. Options and issues in computer assisted language learning, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Liou, H.C. 2000. The electronic bilingual dictionary as a reading aid to EFL learners: Research findings and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13: 467-476.
72. Little, D. and Perclova, V. 2001. The European language portfolio: Guide for teachers and teacher trainers, Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
73. Liu, T.-Y. 2009. A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25: 515-527.
74. Liu, D. and Jiang, P. 2009. Using a corpus-based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL contexts. Modern Language Journal, 93 (i): 61-78.
75. Lomicka, L.L. 1998. "To gloss or not to gloss": An investigation of reading comprehension. Language Learning & Technology, 1: 41-53.
76. Loucky, J. 2005. Combining the benefits of electronic and online dictionaries with CALL web sites to produce effective and enjoyable vocabulary and language learning lessons. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18: 389-416.
77. Lu, M. 2008. Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24: 515-525.
78. Lund, A. 2008. Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20: 35-54.
79. Lund, A. and Smørdal, O. Is there space for the teacher in a wiki?. Paper presented at the WikiSym '06. Odense, Denmark.
80. Machovikov, A., Stolyarov, K., Chernov, M., Sinclair, I. and Machovikova, I. 2002. Computer-based training system for pronunciation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15: 201-214.
81. MacWhinney, B. 1995. " Evaluating foreign language tutoring systems ". In Intelligent language tutors: Theory shaping technology, Edited by: Holland, V.M., Kaplan, J.D. and Sams, M.R. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
82. Miyazoye, T. and Anderson, T. 2010. Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38: 185-199.
83. Nagata, N. 1993. Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77: 330-339.
84. Nagata, N. 1997. An experimental comparison of deductive and inductive feedback generated by a simple parser. System, 25: 515-534.
85. Nagata, N. 1999. The effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32: 469-479.
86. Nagata, N. 2009. " An online Japanese textbook with Natural Language Processing ". In Teaching literature and language online, Edited by: Lancashire, I. 384-409. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
87. O'Brien, M.G. and Levy, R.M. 2008. Exploration through virtual reality: Encounters with the target. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64: 663-691.
88. Orr, M. 2008. Learner perceptions of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. CALL-EJ, 9 Retrieved June 30, 2012 from http://callej.org/journal/9-2/orr.html
89. Paredes, M., Sanchez-Villalon, P.P., Ortega, M. and Velazquez-Iturbide, J.A. 2007. Collaborative composition in a foreign language with handheld computing and web tools. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13: 948-958.
90. Payne, J.S. and Ross, B.M. 2005. Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Modern Language Journal, 9: 35-54.
91. Payne, J.S. and Whitney, P.J. 2002. Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20: 7-32.
92. Peters, E. 2007. Manipulating L2 learners' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 11: 36-58.
93. Plass, J.L., Chun, D.M., Mayer, R.E. and Leutner, D. 1998. Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1): 25-36.
94. Renalli, J. 2008. Learning English with The Sims: Exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21: 441-455.
95. Rypa, M.E. and Price, P. 1999. VILTS: A tale of two technologies. CALICO Journal, 16: 385-404.
96. Samuels, J. Wireless and handheld devices for language learning. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning.
97. Sanprasert, N. 2009. The application of a course management system to enhance autonomy in learning English as a foreign language. System, 38 (1): 109-123.
98. Satar, H.M. and Özdener, N. 2008. The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. Modern Language Journal, 92: 595-613.
99. Sathe, N. and Waltje, J. 2008. The iPod project: A mobile mini-lab. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology (RCET), 4: 32-56.
100. Schmid, E.C. 2007. Enhancing performance knowledge and self-esteem in classroom language learning: The potential of the ACTIVote component of interactive whiteboard technology. System, 35: 119-133.
101. Shekary, M. and Tahririan, M.H. 2006. Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. Modern Language Journal, 90: 557-573.
102. Shih, Y.-C. and Yang, M.T. 2008. A collaborative virtual environment for situated language learning using VEC3D. Educational Technology & Society, 11: 56-68.
103. St.John, E. 2001. A case for using a parallel corpus and concordancer for beginners of a foreign language. Language Learning & Technology, 5: 185-203.
104. Stockwell, G. 2007a. A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19: 105-120.
105. Stockwell, G. 2007b. Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20: 365-383.
106. Sullivan, N. and Pratt, E. 1996. A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29: 491-501.
107. Sun, Y.-C. 2009. Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 13: 88-103.
108. Surface, E.A., Dierdorff, E.C. and Watson, A.M. 2007. Special operations language training software measurement of effectiveness study: Tactical Iraqi study final report, Los Angeles, CA: Alelo.
109. Sykes, J.M. 2005. Synchronous chat and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22: 399-431.
110. Sykes, J.M. 2008. A dynamic approach to social interaction: Synthetic immersive environments & Spanish pragmatics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. (Doctoral dissertation)
111. Tanner, M.W. and Landon, M.M. 2009. The effects of computer-assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners' use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13: 51-65.
112. Taylor, A. 2006. The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal, 23: 309-318.
113. Taylor, A. 2009. CALL-based versus paper-based glosses: Is there a difference in reading comprehension?. CALICO Journal, 27 (1): 147-160.
114. Thorne, S.L. and Payne, J.S. 2005. Evolutionary trajectories, internet-mediated expression and language education. CALICO Journal, 22: 371-397.
115. Thorne, S.L., Webber, D. and Bensinger, A. Interactivity system analysis, AIM, and pedagogical innovation. Paper presented at the CALICO conference.
116. Thornton, P. and Houser, C. 2002. " M-learning: Learning in transit ". In The changing face of CALL: A Japanese perspective, Edited by: Lewis, P. 229-244. London: Taylor & Francis.
117. Thornton, P. and Houser, C. EduCall: Adding interactivity to large lecture classes in Japan via mobile phones. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications.
118. Thornton, P. and Houser, C. 2005. Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21: 217-228.
119. Tozcu, A. 2008. The use of interactive whiteboards in teaching non-roman scripts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21: 143-166.
120. Tudini, V. 2003. Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7: 141-159.
121. Ware, P.D. and O'Dowd, R. 2008. Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12 (1): 43-63.
122. Warschauer, M. 1996. Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13: 7-26.
123. Warschauer, M. 1997. Computer-mediated collaborative learning. The Modern Language Journal, 81: 470-481.
124. Yeh, Y. and Wang, C. 2003. Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21 (1): 131-144.
125. Yoon, H. 2008. More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 12: 31-48.
126. Yoshii, M. 2006. L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10: 85-101.
127. Yoshii, M. and Flaitz, J. 2002. Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20 (1): 33-58.
128. Zhao, Y. 2003. Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21 (1): 7-28.