Enhancing performance knowledge and self-esteem in classroom language learning: The potential of the ACTIVote component of interactive whiteboard technology

System

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 119-133

  Cutrim Schmid, Euline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Campus; Collaboration; EAP; EFL; Ethnographic; Interactive whiteboard technology; Language teaching; Qualitative; Voting systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248642572     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2007.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bell, M.A., 2000. Impact of the electronic interactive whiteboard on students attitudes and achievement in eighth-grade writing instruction. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Baylor University.
2. Cutrim Schmid, E., 2005. An investigation into the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the language classroom: a critical theory of technology perspective. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Lancaster University (UK).
3. Cutrim Schmid E. Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning 19 1 (2006) 47-62
4. Cutrim Schmid, E., 2006b. Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the english language classroom. Computers and Education, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com.
5. Cutts, Q., Kennedy, G., Mitchell, C., and Draper, S., 2004. Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, Hawaii, USA.
6. Cutts, Q., and Kennedy, G., 2005. Connecting learning environments using electronic voting systems. In: Young, A., Tolhurst, A. (Eds), Conferences and Practice in Information Technology 42, 181-186.
7. Draper S.W., and Brown M.I. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (2004) 81-94
8. Elliot C. Using a personal response system in economics teaching. International Review of Economics Education 1 1 (2003) 80-86
9. Glover D., and Miller D. Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technologies for Teacher Education 10 3 (2001) 257-278
10. Goodison T. Learning with ICT at primary level: students' perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning 18 (2002) 282-295
11. Goodison T. Enhancing learning with ICT at primary level. British Journal of Educational Technology 33 2 (2002) 215-228
12. Goodison T. Integrating ICT in the classroom: a case study of two contrasting lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology 34 5 (2003) 549-566
13. Gray G., Hagger-Vaughan L., Pilkington R., and Tomkins S. The pros and cons of interactive whiteboards in relation to the Key stage 3 strategies and framework. Language Learning Journal 32 (2005) 38-44
14. Hall I., and Higgins S. Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboard. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2 (2005) 102-117
15. Stuart S., Brown M., and Draper S.W. Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practitioner's application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (2004) 95-102
16. Walker R. Interactive whiteboards in the MFL classroom. TELL & CALL 3 (2003) 14-16
17. Wall K., Higgins S., and Smith H. The visual helps me understand the complicated things': pupils views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology 36 5 (2005) 851-867