Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 557-573

  Shekary, M ^a   Tahririan, M H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN   (Iran)

^b Sheikhbahaee University   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751249360     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00504.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Allwright, R. (1984). Why don't learners learn what teachers teach?The interaction hypothesis. In D. Singleton & D. Little (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts (pp. 3-18). Dublin, Ireland: IRAAL.
2. Almeida d'Eça, T. (2002). To chat or not to chat in the EFL classroom. Paper presented at the "Language-Communication-Culture" International Conference, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
3. Aoki, K. (1995). Synchronous multi-user textual communication in international tele-collaboration. Electronic Journal of Communication, 5 (4). Retrieved January 6, 2003, from http://www.cios.org/getfile/ AOKI_V5N495
4. Bauman, M. L. (1999). The evolution of internet genres. Computers and Composition, 16, 269-282.
5. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464.
6. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning Technology, 4, 120-136.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1972). The relevance of education. New York: Norton.
8. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.
9. Cheon, H. S. (2003). The viability of computer mediated communication in the Korean secondary EFL classroom. Asian EFL Journal, 5, 1. Retrieved May 5, 2003, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/march03.sub2.php
10. Chun, D. (1998). Using computer assisted class discussion to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, & K. Arens (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice 2 (pp. 57-80). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
11. Chun, L. (2003). Text-based online chat, noticing and second language acquisition. Research Proposal. Retrieved September 6, 2003, from http://www.msu.edu/user/laichun1/researchproject.htm
12. Doughty, C. (1998). Acquiring competence in a second language: Form and function. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 128-156). New York: Modern Language Association.
13. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Doughty, C., & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 50-80.
15. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46.
16. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
17. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus on form. System, 30, 419-432.
18. Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285-301.
19. Eyman, A. D. (1995). Hypertextual collaboration in the computer-assisted composition classroom: An introduction to computer-mediated communication pedagogy. Unpublished master's thesis, University of North Carolina at Wilmington.
20. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hamzah, M. (2001, December). A theoretical rationale in the application of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in an English for specific purposes (ESP) setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia. Retrieved May 4, 2003, from http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/ham01182.htm
22. Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production and knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2, 39-53.
23. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
24. Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in nonnative-nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language. System, 29, 267-287.
25. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
26. Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
27. Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-445.
28. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-473.
29. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 143-166.
30. Kroonenberg, N. (1995). Developing communicative and thinking skills via electronic mail. TESOL Journal, 4, 24-27.
31. Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. La Pierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
33. Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Loewen, S. (2003). Variations in the frequency and characteristics of incidental focus on form. Language Teaching Research, 7, 315-345.
35. Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54, 153-188.
36. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
37. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26, 32-51.
40. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
41. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
42. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
43. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
44. Meskill, C. (1999). Computers as tools for socio-collaborative language learning. In K. Cameron (Ed.), Computer assisted language learning (CALL) media design and applications (pp. 141-162). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
45. Meunier, L. (1998). Personality and motivational factors in electronic networking. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 63-126). Boston: Heinle.
46. Murphy, K. L., & Collins, M. P. (1997). Development of communication conventions in instructional electronic chats. Journal of Distance Education, 12, 177-200.
47. Murphy, S. A. (2002). On the role of input through songs, reading, and film: A test of Schmidt's Noticing Hypothesis. Paper presented at the 2002 Symposium on Investigating Adult L2 Learners' Response to Input, Columbia University. Retrieved October 4, 2003 from http://www.tc.columbia.edu/Academic/TESOL/Han/adv.slafinalpaper.doc
48. Neuage, T. (2004). Conversational analysis of chatroom talk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
49. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
50. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 481-549.
51. Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. New York: Routledge.
52. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Peterson, M. (2002). Emergent network technologies in CALL: MOOs and learning theory. CALL-IS-Newsletter, 18. Retrieved December 11, 2003, from http://www.itp.innoved.org/wiki/callisnews/ Emergent_network_technologies
54. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
55. Salaberry, M. R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 5-27.
56. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
57. Schmidt, R. W. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
58. Schmidt, R. W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
59. Shohamy, E. (1998). How can language testing and SLA benefit from each other?The case of discourse. In L. Bachman & A. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 156-175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Swain, M. (2001). Content specification and validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18, 273-302.
64. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
65. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
66. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 251-274.
67. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Reiber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1, pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum Press.
69. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
70. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
71. Warschauer, M. (1998). Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 757-761.
72. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.
73. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.