Teaching and Testing Writing

The Handbook of Language Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 486-517

  Polio, Charlene ^a   Williams, Jessica ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive factors in learning to write; College English Test (CET) and National Matriculation English Test (NMET); Error correction in writing; Ethical issues related to L2 assessment; Genre based pedagogies and individual voice and self discovery; Process pedagogies dominating North American classrooms; Second foreign language (L2) writing; SLA research, language teaching and role of form focused instruction; Teaching and testing writing; Writing process and process approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 80955129746     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444315783.ch26     Document Type: Chapter

References (230)

1. Adam, C. & Artemeva, N. (2002). Writing instruction for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classes: Introducing second language learners to the academic community. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 179-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Alderson, C. & Huhta, A. (2005). The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing 22, 301-20.
3. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal 78, 465-83.
4. Allison, D. (1994). Comments on Sarah Benesch's "ESL, ideology and the politics of pragmatism." TESOL Quarterly 28, 618-23.
5. Arkoudis, S. & O'Loughlin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Testing 21, 284-304.
6. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, 227-49.
7. Ayoun, D. (2004). The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal 88, 31-55.
8. Belcher, D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly 40, 133-56.
9. Benesch, S. (1995). Genres and processes in sociocultural context. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, 191-5.
10. Benesch, S. (1998). Anorexia: A feminist EAP curriculum. In T. Smoke (ed.), Adult ESL: Politics, pedagogy and participation in classrooms and community programs (pp. 101-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8, 215-41.
13. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogical discourse. Vol. 4: Class, codes and control. London: Routledge.
14. Bhatia, R. (1991). A genre-based approach to ESP development. World Englishes 10, 1-14.
15. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36, 9-48.
17. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
18. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14, 191-205.
19. Bosher, S. (1998). The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 205- 41.
20. Braine, G. (2001). When an exit test fails. System 29, 221-34.
21. Braxley, K. (2005). Mastering academic English: International graduate students' use of dialogue and speech genres to meet the writing demands of graduate school. In J. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives (pp. 11-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Breiner-Sanders, K., Swender, E., & Terry, R. (2001). ACTFL proficiency guidelines: Writing. ACTFL: www.actfl.org.
23. Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing 18, 393-407.
24. Brown, A. (2005). Self-assessment of writing in independent language learning programs: The value of annotated samples. Assessing Writing 10, 174-91.
25. Brown, J. D. (2004). What do we mean by bias, Englishes, Englishes in testing, and English language proficiency? World Englishes 23, 317-19.
26. Burnard, L. & McEnerny, T. (2000). Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective. London: Longman.
27. Butler, Y. G., & Iino, M. (2005). Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 "action plan." Language Policy 4, 25-45.
28. Byrnes, H. & Sprang, K. (2003). Fostering advanced L2 literacy: A genre-based cognitive approach. In H. Byrnes & H. H. Maxim (eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 47-85). Boston: Thomson/Heinle.
29. Cahill, D. (1999). Contrastive rhetoric, orientalism and the Chinese second language writer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
30. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
31. Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). The place of World Englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication 57, 586-617.
32. Carson, J. & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing 5, 1-19.
33. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 267-96.
34. Chang, M. J. (2004). Analysis of writing activities in Korean English textbooks. Unpublished master's thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
35. Christianson, K. (1997). Dictionary use by EFL writers: What really happens. Journal of Second Language Writing 6, 23-44.
36. Christie, F. (1989). Language and education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Cohen, A. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom. Boston: Heinle.
38. Cohen, A. & Cavalcanti, M. (1990). Feedback on written compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155-77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication 7, 482-511.
41. Cumming, A. (2001). ESL/EFL instructor's practices for writing assessment: Specific purposes or general purposes? Language Testing 18, 207-24.
42. Cumming, A. (2002). Assessing L2 writing: Alternative constructs and ethical dilemmas. Assessing Writing 8, 73-83.
43. Cumming, A., Grant, L., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Powers, D. (2004). A teacher-verification study of speaking and writing prototype tasks for a new TOEFL. Language Testing 21, 107-45.
44. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eousanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing 10, 5-43.
45. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Powers, D., Santos, T., & Taylor, C. (2000). TOEFL 2000 writing framework: A working paper (TOEFL monograph no. MS-18; ETS RM-00-05). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
46. Davies, A., Hamp-Lyons, L., & Kemp, C. (2003). Whose norms? International proficiency tests in English. World Englishes 22, 571-84.
47. de Guerrero, M. & Villamil, O. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal 84, 484-96.
48. de Haan, P. & van Esch, K. (2005). The development of writing in English and Spanish as foreign languages. Assessing Writing 10, 100-16.
49. Delpit, L. (1999). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review 58, 280-98.
50. Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Dudley-Evans, T. (1997). Genre models for the teaching of academic writing to second language speakers: Advantages and disadvantages. In T. Miller (ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 150-9). Washington DC: USIS.
52. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning 51, SUPP/1, 1-46.
53. Ellis, R. & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, 59-84.
54. Fathman, A. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student correction: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Feez, S. (2002). Heritage and innovation in second language education. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 43-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 29, 33-53.
57. Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
58. Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Ferris, D. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime . . . ?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 49-62.
60. Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the shortand long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Figueras, N., North, B., Takala, S., Verhelst, N., & Van Avermaet, P. (2005). Relating examinations to the Common European Framework: A manual. Language Testing 22, 261-79.
62. Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 91-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Flowerdew, L. (2003). A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the problemsolution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly 37, 489-511.
64. Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 299-324.
65. Freedman, A. & Adam, C. (2000). Write where you are: Situated learning to write in university and workplace settings. In P. Dias & A. Pare (eds.), Transitions: Writing in workplace and academic settings (pp. 31-60). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
66. Gaskill, D. & Cobb, T. (2004). Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System 32, 301-19.
67. Gass, S. (1983). The development of L2 intuitions. TESOL Quarterly 17, 273-91.
68. Gates, S. (2003). Inconsistencies in writing within the Japanese junior high school EFL education system. JALT Journal 25, 197-217.
69. Goldstein, L. (2005). Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
70. Goldstein, L. & Conrad, S. (1990). Input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly 24, 443-60.
71. Gorsuch, G. (1998). Yakudoku EFL instruction in two Japanese high school classrooms: An exploratory study. JALT Journal 20, 6-32.
72. Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
73. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1986). No new lamps for old yet, please. TESOL Quarterly 20, 790-6.
74. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing 14, 295-303.
75. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2003). Writing teachers as assessors of writing. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 162-89). New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Hamp-Lyons, L. & Zhang, B. (2001). World Englishes: Issues in and from academic writing. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 101-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing 11, 329-50.
78. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. Levy & S. Ransdell (eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
79. Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. Hedgcock, J. (2005). Taking stock of research and pedagogy in L2 writing. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 597-614). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Helms-Park, R. & Stapleton, P. (2003). Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 245-65.
82. Henry, A. & Roseberry, R. (1998). An evaluation of genre-based approach to the teaching of EAP/ESP writing. TESOL Quarterly 32, 147-56.
83. Heyworth, F. (2006). The Common European Framework. ELT Journal 60, 181-3.
84. Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers' text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. Hirvela, A. & Sweetland, Y. (2005). Two case studies of L2 writers' experiences across language-directed portfolio contexts. Assessing Writing 10, 192-213.
86. Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Horner, B. & Trimbur, J. (2002). English Only and U.S. college composition. College Composition and Communication 53, 594-630.
88. Horowitz, D. (1986). Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly 20, 141-4.
89. Hu, G. (2005). English language education in China: Policies, progress, and problems. Language Policy 4, 5-24.
90. Hunston, S. & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
91. Huot, B. A. (1993). The influence of holistic scoring procedures on reading and rating student essays. In M. Williamson & B. Huot (eds.), Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 206-36). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
92. Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal 21, 66-78.
93. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94. Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
95. Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Hyon, S. (1996). Genres in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30, 693- 722.
97. Hyon, S. (2002). Genre and ESL reading: A classroom study. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 121-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
98. Jacobs, G., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. Y. (1998). Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 307-18.
99. Jacoby, S., Leech, D., & Holten, C. (1995). A genre-based approach developmental writing course for undergraduate science majors. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 351-73). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
100. Jarrett, S., Losh, E., & Puente, D. (2006). Transnational identifications: Biliterate writers in a first-year humanities course. Journal of Second Language Writing 15, 24-48.
101. Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly 40, 157-81.
102. Johns, A. (1995a). Genre and pedagogical purpose. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, 181-90.
103. Johns, A. (1995b). Teaching classroom and authentic genres. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 277-92). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
104. Johns, A. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Johns, A. (2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 195-217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Johnson, M. (2004). A philosophy of second language acquisition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
107. Jones, R., Garralda, A., Li, D., & Loch, G. (2006). Dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 15, 1-23.
108. Kay, H. & Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). Genre: What teachers think. ELT Journal 52, 308-14.
109. Kikuchi, K. (2006). Revisiting English entrance exams at Japanese universities after a decade. JALT Journal 28, 77-96.
110. Kim, Y., Lowenstein, K. L., Pearson, P. D., & McLellan, M. (2001). A framework for conceptualizing and evaluating the contributions of written language activity in oral language development for ESL students. In J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (eds.), 50th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
111. Kobayashi, H. & Rinnert, C. (2002). High school student perceptions of first language literacy instruction: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 11, 91-116.
112. Kraemer, A. N. (2005). Implementing portfolio assessment in second-year German language classrooms. Unpublished master's thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
113. Krappels, A. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 37-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Kubota, R. (2001). The impact of globalization on language teaching in Japan. In D. Block & D. Cameron (eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 13-28). London: Routledge.
115. Kubota, R. (2003). New approaches to gender, class, and race in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 31-47.
116. Kunnan, A. (2000). Fairness and justice for all. In A. Kunnan (ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment (pp. 1-14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117. Lally, C. (2000). First language influences in second language composition: The effect of pre-writing. Foreign Language Annals 33, 428-32.
118. Lantolf, J. & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 197-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
119. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Lee, H. K. (2004). A comparative study of ESL writers' performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test. Assessing Writing 9, 4-26.
121. Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 285-312.
122. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 37-63
123. Leeman, J. (2005). Engaging critical pedagogy. Spanish for native speakers. Foreign Language Annals 38, 35-45.
124. Li, J. (2006). The mediation of technology in ESL writing and its implications for writing assessment. Assessing Writing 11, 5-21.
125. Liebowitz, B. (2006). Learning in an additional language in a multilingual society: A South African case study on university-level writing. TESOL Quarterly 39, 661-81.
126. Little, D. (2005). The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing 22, 321-36.
127. Liu, J. & Hansen, J. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
128. Long, M. H. (2007). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long, Problems in SLA (pp. 75-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
129. Lowenberg, P. (2002). Assessing English proficiency in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes 21, 431-35.
130. Luke, A. (1996). Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & A. Williams (eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 308-38). London: Longman.
131. Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters? Language Testing 19, 246-76.
132. Luoma, S. & Tarnanen, M. (2003). Creating a self-rating instrument for second language writing: From idea to implementation. Language Testing 20, 440-65.
133. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, 399-432.
134. Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). "Something to shoot for": A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
135. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and second language development: An empirical study of L2 classroom interaction. Applied Linguistics 27, 405-30.
136. Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
137. Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82, 338-56.
138. Martin, J. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
139. Matsuda, P. (1997). Contrastive rhetoric in context: A dynamic model of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 6, 45-60.
140. McGroarty, M. & Zhu, W. (1997). Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision. Language Learning 47, 1-43.
141. Mendonça, C. & Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 28, 745-69.
142. Morgan, B. & Ramanathan, V. (2005). Critical literacies and language education: Global and local perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25, 151-69.
143. Nagy, P. & Stewart, G. (2000). Canadian language benchmarks companion tables. www.language.ca/display_page.asp?page_id=439.
144. Nassaji, H. & Cumming, A. (2000). What's in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research 4, 95- 121.
145. Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness 9, 34-51.
146. National Standards Foreign Language Project (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project.
147. Norris, J. (2005). Book review: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Language Testing 22, 399-411.
148. Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50, 417-528.
149. Orr, J. (2005). Dialogic investigations: Cultural artifacts in ESL composition classes. In J. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives (pp. 55-76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
150. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 109-48
151. Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24, 492-518
152. O'Sullivan, I. & Chambers, E. (2006). Learners' writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing 15, 49-68.
153. Pang, T. (2002). Textual analysis and contextual awareness building: A comparison of two approaches to teaching genre. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 145-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
154. Panova, I. & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in the adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 36, 573-95.
155. Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., & H-Lemonnier, F. (2006). "History of Theatre" websites: A brief history of the writing process in a high school ESL language arts class. Journal of Second Language Writing 14, 233-58.
156. Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meaning: Using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
157. Patthey-Chavez, G. & Ferris, D. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multivoiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English 31, 51-90.
158. Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly 30, 201-30.
159. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 99-126.
160. Poehner, M. & Lantolf, J. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 9, 233-65.
161. Polio, C. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning 47, 101-43.
162. Polio, C. (2003). An overview of approaches to second language writing research. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 35-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
163. Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). "If only I had more time:" ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 43- 68.
164. Qi, D. S. & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing 10, 277-303.
165. Ramanathan, V. & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 8, 45-75.
166. Reichelt, M. (1997). Writing instruction at the German Gymnasium: A 13th grade English class writes the Arbitur. Journal of Second Language Writing 6, 265-91.
167. Reichelt, M. (2001). A critical review of foreign language writing research on pedagogical practices. Modern Language Journal 85, 578-98.
168. Reichelt, M. (2005). English-language writing instruction in Poland. Journal of Second Language Writing 14, 215-32.
169. Reppen, R. (1995). A genre-based approach to content writing instruction. TESOL Journal 4, 32-5.
170. Roca de Larios, J., Manchon, R., & Murphy, L. (2006). Generating text in native and foreign language writing: A temporal analysis of problem-solving formulation processes. Modern Language Journal 90, 100-14.
171. Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., & Manchon, R. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: A study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 8, 13-44.
172. Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal 59, 23-30.
173. Sachs, R. & Polio, C. (2007). Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 67-100.
174. Santos, T. (1992). Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL. Journal of Second Language Writing 1, 1-15.
175. Santos, T. (2001). The place of politics in second language writing. In T. Silva & P. Matsuda (eds.), On second language writing (pp. 173-90) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
176. Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, 259-92.
177. Sasaki, M. (2002). Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners' writing processes. In S. Ransdell & M-L. Barbier (eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49- 80). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
178. Scarcella, R. (2002). Some key factors affecting English language learners' development of advanced literacy. In M. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages (pp. 209-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
179. Schleppegrell, M. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Language and Education 12, 431-59.
180. Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
181. Schleppegrell, M. & Achugar, M. (2003). Language learning and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal 12, 21-7.
182. Shaw, P. & Liu, E. (1998). What develops in the development of second-language writing? Applied Linguistics 19, 225-54.
183. Shen, F. (1989). The classroom and the wider culture: Identity as a key to learning English composition. College Composition and Communication 40, 459-66.
184. Shi, L. (1998). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students' compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 319-45.
185. Shi, L. (2001). Native- and nonnative-speaking EFL teachers' evaluation of Chinese students' English writing. Language Testing 18, 303-25.
186. Shohamy, E. (1997). Testing methods, testing consequences: Are they ethical? Are they fair? Language Testing 14, 340-9.
187. Silva, T. & Brice, C. (2004). Research in teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 70-106.
188. Sinclair, J. (1990). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
189. Smoke, T. (2001). Instructional strategies for making ESL students integral to the university. In T. Silva & P. Matsuda (eds.), On second language writing (pp. 129-41) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
190. Song, B. & August, B. (2002). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: A powerful alternative? Journal of Second Language Writing 11, 49-72.
191. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching 30, 73-87.
192. Stapleton, P. (2002). Critiquing voice as a viable pedagogical tool in L2 writing: Returning the spotlight to ideas. Journal of Second Language Writing 11, 177-90.
193. Starfield, S. (2004). "Why does this feel empowering?": Thesis writing, concordancing and the corporatizing university. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (eds.), Critical pedagogy and language learning (pp. 138-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
194. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing 14, 153-73.
195. Sullivan, K. & Lindgren, E. (2002). Self-assessment in autonomous computer-aided second language writing. ELT Journal 56, 258-66.
196. Susser, B. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 31-48.
197. Swaffer, J. (2003). A template for advanced learning tasks: Staging genre reading and cultural literacy through the précis. In H. Byrnes & H. H. Maxim (eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 19-45). Boston, MA: Thomson/Heinle.
198. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 235-56). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
199. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
200. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37, 285-304.
201. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
202. Swales, J. & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
203. Tarnopolsky, O. (2000). Writing English as a foreign language: A report from the Ukraine. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, 209-26.
204. Tribble, C. (2002). Corpora and corpus analysis: New windows on academic writing. In J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 131-49). London: Pearson.
205. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327-69.
206. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 337-44.
207. Villamil, O. & de Guerrero, M. (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 23-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
208. Wallace, C. (2001). Critical literacy in the second language classroom. Power and control. In B. Comber & A. Simpson (eds.), Negotiating critical literacies in the classroom (pp. 209-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
209. Wang, W. & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 11, 225-46.
210. Weigle, S. (1994). Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions. Language Testing 11, 197-223.
211. Weigle, S. (1998). Using FACETS to model rater training effects. Language Testing 15, 263-87.
212. Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
213. Weigle, S. (2004). Integrating reading and writing in a competency test for non-native speakers of English. Assessing Writing 9, 27-55.
214. Weissberg, R. (2000). Developing relationships in the acquisition of English syntax: Writing versus speech. Learning and Instruction 10, 37-53.
215. Weissberg, R. (2006). Connecting speaking and writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
216. Williams, J. (2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 173-201.
217. Williams, J. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 671-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
218. Williams, J. (2008). The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (eds.), The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 10-25). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
219. Williams, J. & Severino, C. (2004). The writing center and second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 165-72.
220. Wolfe, E. & Manalo, J. (2004). Composition medium comparability in a direct writing assessment of non-native English speakers. Language Learning & Technology 8, 53-65.
221. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. (Technical Report No. 17). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
222. Wong, W. (2001). Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 345-68.
223. Wu, W. & Stansfield, C. (2001). Towards authenticity of task in test development. Language Testing 18, 187-206.
224. You, X. (2004a). New directions in EFL writing: A report from China. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 253-6.
225. You, X. (2004b). "The choice made from no choice": English writing instruction in a Chinese university. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 97-110.
226. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 17, 165-90.
227. Cleland, A. & Pickering, M. (2006). Do speaking and writing employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language 54, 185-98.
228. Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
229. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, 209-22.
230. Zimmermann, R. (2000). L2 writing: Subprocesses. A model of formulating and empirical findings. Learning and Instruction 10, 73-99.