Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 573-595

  Panova, Iliana ^a   Lyster, Roy ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14744286776     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588241     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allwright, R. L. (1975). Problems in the study of the language teacher's treatment of learner error. In M. Burt & H. Dulay (Eds.), New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education: On TESOL '75 (pp. 96-109). Washington, DC: TESOL.
2. Bialystok, E., & Sharwood Smith, W. (1985). Interlanguage is not a state of mind. Applied Linguistics, 6, 101-117.
3. Bley-Vroman, R. (1986). Hypothesis testing in second-language acquisition theory. Language Learning, 36, 353-376.
4. Buyer, L., & Dominowski, R. (1989). Retention of solutions: It is better to give than to receive. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 353-363.
5. Clark, S. (1995). The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory. Memory & Cognition, 23, 442-455.
6. de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529-555.
7. Doughty, C. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1993: Strategic interaction and language acquisition (pp. 96-108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp. 79-114). London: Academic Press.
10. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10, 583-593.
12. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Grosofsky, A., Payne, D., & Campbell, K. (1994). Does the generation effect depend upon selective displaces rehearsal? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 53-68.
14. Havranek, G. (1999). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: Preliminary results of an empirical study. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère: Proceedings of the Eighth EUROSLA Conference, 2, 189-206.
15. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote metalinguistic awareness in the French immersion classroom? In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lin, Y.-H., & Hedgcock, J. (1996). Negative feedback incorporation among high-proficiency and low-proficiency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning, 46, 567-611.
17. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
18. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
19. Lyster, R (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
20. Lyster, R. (2002). The importance of differentiating negotiation of form and meaning in classroom interaction. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 381-397). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
21. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
22. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive implicit negative feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
23. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
24. Netten, J. (1991). Towards a more language oriented second language classroom. In L. Malavé & G. Duquette (Eds.), Language, culture and cognition (pp. 284-304). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
25. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
26. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaetse (Eds.), The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
28. Roberts, M. (1995). Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Report No. 9, pp. 162-182). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
29. Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 274-282.
30. Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1988). Grammar and second language teaching New York: Newbury House.
31. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. Slamecka, N., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
33. Slimani, A. (1992). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In C. Anderson & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 197-221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT. Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
35. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
36. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
37. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 370-391.
39. White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-110.