Form-focused instruction

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 671-691

  Williams, Jessica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873653747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-51     Document Type: Chapter

References (142)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
2. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of positive and negative feedback in the second language acquisition of the passé composé and imparfait. Modern Language Journal, 85, 226-243.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Do learners recognize pragmatic violations? TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233-262.
4. Braidi, S. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52,1-42.
5. Bygate, M. (2000). The effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 23-48). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
6. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15,357-386.
7. Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1997). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching? TESOL Quarterly, 31,141-152.
8. Cook, H. (2001). Why can't learners of JFL distinguish polite from impolite speech styles? In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 80-102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Craik, F, & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104,268-294.
10. Day, E., & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches in language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41,25-58.
11. De Bot, K. (2000). Psycholinguistics in applied linguistics: Trends and perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 224-237.
12. DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17,379-410.
13. de la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112.
14. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long, (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). New York: Blackwell.
16. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.), (1998a). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ellis, N. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of implicit and explicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5,289-319.
20. Ellis, N. (2001). Memory for language. In. P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Ellis, N., & Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In A. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 53-83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91-113.
23. Ellis, R. (1997). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), SLA research and language teaching (pp. 107-133). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 39-60.
25. Ellis, R. (1999). Theoretical perspectives on interaction and language learning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
26. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, Supplement 1, 1-46.
27. Ellis, R. (2002). Methodological options in grammar teaching. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 155-179). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001a). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
29. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001b). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407-432.
30. Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285-301.
31. Ellis, R., Heimbach, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1999). Modified input and the acquisition of word meanings by children and adults. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 63-114). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 43, 449-491.
33. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19,1-23.
34. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research,3, 215-245.
35. Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness-raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14,385-407.
36. Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 323-351.
37. Fotos, S. (2002). Structure-based interactive tasks for the EFL grammar learner. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 135-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1989). Incorporated repairs in NNS discourse. In M. Eisenstein (Ed.), Variation and second language acquisition (pp. 71-96). New York: Plenum.
40. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1991). Miscommunication in nonnative speaker discourse. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. Weimann (Eds.), Miscommunication and problematic talk (pp. 121-145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernandez-Garcia, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549-581.
42. Harley, B. (1998). The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 156-174). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. He, X., & Ellis, R. (1999). Modified output and the acquisition of word meaning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 113-132). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
44. Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.
46. Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
47. Joe, A. (1998). What effects do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 19, 357-377.
48. Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
49. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 183-216). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
50. Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33-60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Kupferberg, I., & Olshtain, E. (1996). Explicit contrastive instruction facilitates the acquisition of difficult L2 forms. Language Awareness, 3,149-165.
52. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22,1-26.
53. Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217-258). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
54. Leow, R. (1997a). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning,8,151-182.
55. Leow, R. (1997b). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47,467-505.
56. Leow, R. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557-582.
57. Lightbown, P. (1991). What have we here? Some observations on the influence of instruction on L2 learning. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 197-212). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
58. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 563-579.
59. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In. L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition (pp. 113-141). New York: Newbury House.
60. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in crosscultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
62. Long, M. H. (to appear). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-56.
64. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82,357-371.
65. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303-324.
67. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 123-67). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
68. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-80.
69. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
70. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
71. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
72. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Recasts, interaction, and interlanguage development: Are responses red herrings? Modern Language Journal,82, 338-356.
73. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83-108.
74. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
75. Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at crosspurposes? Applied Linguistics, 17,286-325.
76. Nassaji, H. (1999). Toward integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: Some pedagogical possibilities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55,385-402.
77. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9,35-51.
78. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
79. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47,203-210.
80. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative metaanalysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
81. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82. Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17,459-482.
84. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50,119-151.
85. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21,109-145.
86. Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
87. Pica, T. (1992). The textual outcomes of native speaker-non-native speaker negotiation: What do they reveal about second language learning? In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context(pp. 198-237). Cambridge, MA: Heath.
88. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language acquisition? Language Learning, 44,493-527.
89. Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1, 48-72.
90. Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86,1-19.
91. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible input as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
92. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Faludon, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language research and instruction. In S. Gass & G. Crookes (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
93. Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1998). The role of interaction in native speaker comprehension of non-native speaker speech. Modern Language Journal,82, 308-319.
94. Robinson, P. (1995). Review article: Attention, memory, and the noticing hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
95. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-68.
96. Robinson, P. (1997). Automaticity and generalizability of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19,233-247.
97. Robinson, R. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction(pp. 287-318). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
98. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece of the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-553.
99. Rott, S., Williams, J., & Cameron, R. (2002). The effect of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research, 6,183-222.
100. Samuda, V. (2000). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 119-140). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
101. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11,17-46.
102. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. In J. Hulstijn & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Consciousness in second language learning (pp. 11-26): AILA Review. Vol. 11.
103. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
104. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
105. Schmidt, R. (in press). The centrality of attention in SLA. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
106. Simard, D., & Wong, W. (2001). Alertness, orientation, and detection: The conceptualization of attentional functions in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23,103-124.
107. Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of the missing –no—: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47, 547-583.
108. Shehadeh, A. (1999). Non-native speakers' production of modified comprehensible output and second language learning. Language Learning, 49, 627-675.
109. Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self- and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 433-457.
110. Skehan, P. (1998).A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
111. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
112. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93-120.
113. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
114. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching Abstracts, 30, 73-87.
115. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in the L2 classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-221.
116. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83,1-22.
117. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-44). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
118. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
119. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
120. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
121. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82,320-337.
122. Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171-199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
123. Takashima, H., & Ellis, R. (1999). Output enhancement and the acquisition of past tense. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 173-188). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
124. Thornbury S. (1998). Comments on –Direct approaches in L2 instruction.— TESOL Quarterly, 32,109-115.
125. Thornbury S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote noticing. ELT Journal, 51, 326-335.
126. Van den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
127. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
128. VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 435-450.
129. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. New York: Ablex.
130. VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
131. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
132. VanPatten, B., & Lee, J. (1995). Making communicative language happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
133. VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
134. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
135. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7,133-161.
136. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.
137. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29,325-340.
138. Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139-155). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
139. Wittrock, M. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
140. Wong, W. (2001). Modality and attention to form and meaning in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 345-388.
141. Wong, W., & Simard, D. (1999). Textual enhancement as input enhancement: Astate of the art review. Unpublished manuscript.
142. Zaki, H., & Ellis, R. (1999). Learning vocabulary through interacting with a written text. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 153-169). Amsterdam: Benjamins.