Linguistic Features of the Language of Schooling

Linguistics and Education

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 431-459

  Schleppegrell, Mary J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346451214     PISSN: 08985898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00073-0     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Atkinson, D. (1996). The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25, 333-371.
2. Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nikulaelae registers. Language, 64, 707-736.
3. Biber, D. (1998). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Biber, D. (1991). Oral and literate characteristics of selected primary school reading materials. Text, 11(1), 73-96.
5. Biber, D. (1992). On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15, 133-163.
6. Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 141-158.
8. Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105-123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chafe, W. (1986). Writing in the perspective of speaking. In C.C. Cooper, & S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 12-39). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Chafe, W. (1992). Information flow in speaking and writing. In P. Downing, S.D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 17-29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Chafe, W., & Danielewicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz, & F.J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83-113). New York: Academic Press.
12. Christie, F. (1985). Language and schooling. In S. Tchudi (Ed.), Language, schooling and society (pp. 21-40). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
13. Christie, F. (1986). Writing in schools: Generic structure as ways of meaning. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 221-239). London: Pinter.
14. Christie, F. (1991). First- and second-order registers in education. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 235-256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Christie, F. (1998). Science and apprenticeship: The pedagogic discourse. In J.R. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 152-177). London: Routledge.
16. Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 196-230). London: Cassell.
17. Collins, J. (1987). Using cohesion analysis to understand access to knowledge. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 67-97). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Conrad, S.M. (1996). Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology. Linguistics & Education, 8(3), 299-326.
19. Danielewicz, J.M. (1984). The interaction between text and context: A study of how adults and children use spoken and written language in four contexts. In A.D. Pellegrini, & T.D. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts (pp. 243-260). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Durst, R.K. (1984). The development of analytic writing. In A.N. Applebee (Ed.), Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction (pp. 79-102). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. Fries, P.H. (1981). On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1-38.
22. Gadda, G. (1995). The university Subject A examination book. Oakland, CA: University of California.
23. Ghadessy, M. (Ed.). (1995b). Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter.
24. Gumperz, J.J., Kaltman, H., & O'Connor, M.C. (1984). Cohesion in spoken and written discourse: Ethnic style and the transition to literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 3-19). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
26. Halliday, M.A.K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz, & J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Halliday, M.A.K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993a). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin's The Origin of the Species. In M.A.K. Halliday, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 86-105). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993b). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M.A.K. Halliday, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 69-85). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
30. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
31. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
32. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social -semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J.R. (Eds.). (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
34. Harvey, N. (1993). Text analysis for specific purposes. Prospect, 8(3), 25-41.
35. Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Huddleston, R.D. (1971). The sentence in written English: A syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Jones, J., Gollin, S., Drury, H., & Economou, D. (1989). Systemic-functional linguistics and its application to the TESOL curriculum. In R. Hasan, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 257-328). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. Lazaraton, A. (1992). Linking ideas with AND in spoken and written discourse. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 191-206.
39. Martin, J.R. (1983a). Conjunction: The logic of English text. In J.S. Petofi, & E. Sozer (Eds.), Micro and macro connexity of texts (pp. 1-72). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
40. Martin, J.R. (1983b). The development of register. In J. Fine, & R.O. Freedle (Eds.), Developmental issues in discourse (pp. 1-40). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Martin, J.R. (1989). Factual writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Martin, J.R. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 307-337). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
43. Martin, J.R. (1992). English text. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
44. Mauranen, A. (1996). Discourse competence - evidence from thematic development in native and non-native texts. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 195-230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45. Michaels, S. (1981). "Sharing time": Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423-442.
46. Michaels, S. (1986). Narrative presentations: An oral preparation for literacy with first graders. In J. Cook-Gumperz (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 94-116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Michaels, S., & Cazden, C.B. (1986). Teacher/child collaboration as oral preparation for literacy. In B. B. Schieffelin, & P. Gilmore (Eds.), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 132-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
48. Michaels, S., & Collins, J. (1984). Oral discourse styles: Classroom interaction and the acquisition of literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 219-244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. Michaels, S., & Cook-Gumperz, J. (1979). A study of sharing time with first grade students: Discourse narratives in the classroom. In Fifth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 647-660). Berkeley, CA: Berkely Linguistics Society.
50. Michaels, S., & Foster, M. (1985). Peer-peer learning: Evidence from a student-run sharing time. In A. Jaggar, & M.T. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Observing the language learner (pp. 143-158). Newark, DE: International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English.
51. Nystrand, M., & Wiemelt, J. (1991). When is a text explicit? Formalist and dialogical conceptions. Text, 11(1), 25-41.
52. Olson, D.R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.
53. Olson, D.R. (1980). Some social aspects of meaning in oral and written language. In D.R. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome S. Bruner (pp. 90-108). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
54. Ravelli, L.J. (1996). Making language accessible: Successful text writing for museum visitors. Linguistics & Education, 8(4), 367-388.
55. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Schleppegrell, M.J. (1989). Functions of because in spoken discourse. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
57. Schleppegrell, M.J. (1991). Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 121-135.
58. Schleppegrell, M.J. (1992). Subordination and linguistic complexity. Discourse Processes, 15(2), 117-131.
59. Schleppegrell, M.J. (1996a). Conjunction in spoken English and ESL writing. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 271-285.
60. Schleppegrell, M.J. (1996b). Strategies for discourse cohesion: Because in ESL writing. Functions of Language, 5(2), 235-254.
61. Schleppegrell, M.J. (1998a). Agency in Environmental Education. Linguistics & Education, 9(1).
62. Schleppegrell, M.J. (1998b). Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English, 32(2), 182-211.
63. Schleppegrell, M.J., & Simich-Dudgeon, C. (1996). What's a good answer? Awareness about behavioral and content features of successful classroom interaction. Linguistics & Education, 10(4), 273-286.
64. Schleppegrell, M.J., & Colombi, M.C. (1997). Text organization by bilingual writers: Clause structure as a reflection of discourse structure. Written Communication, 14(4), 481-503.
65. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
66. Sinclair, M. (1993). Are academic texts really decontextualized and fully explicit? A pragmatic perspective on the role of context in written communication. Text, 13(4), 529-558.
67. Snow, C.E. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165-189.
68. Snow, C.E. (1990). The development of definitional skill. Journal of Child Language, 17, 697-710.
69. Snow, C.E., Cancini, H., Gonzalez, P., & Shriberg, E. (1989). Giving formal definitions: An oral language correlate of school literacy. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 233-249). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
70. Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Taylor, C.V. (1983). Structure and theme in printed school text. Text, 3(2), 197-228.
72. Torrance, N., & Olson, D.R. (1984). Oral language competence and the acquisition of literacy. In A.D. Yawkey, & T.D. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts (pp. 167-182). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
73. Vande Kopple, W.J. (1994). Some characteristics and functions of grammatical subjects in scientific discourse. Written Communication, 11(4), 534-564.
74. Veel, R. (1998). The greening of school science: Ecogenesis in secondary classrooms. In J.R. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 114-151). London: Routledge.
75. Wignell, P. (1994). Genre across the curriculum. Linguistics & Education, 6(4), 355-372.