Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1629-1640

  Schneider, Darryl W ^a,c   Verbruggen, Frederick ^a,b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inhibition; Reference points; Response selection; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; REFERENCE VALUE;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); JUDGMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 54549123606     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210802138511     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Arbuthnott, K. D. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1030-1042.
3. Arbuthnott, K., & Frank, J. (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33-41.
4. Dehaene, S. (1989). The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data. Perception&Psychophysics, 45, 557-566.
5. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 603-609.
6. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
7. Hübner, M., Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 289-297.
8. Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 188-196.
9. Jonides, J., & Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 29-44.
10. Koch, I., Gade, M., & Philipp, A. M. (2004). Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 51, 52-58.
11. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354.
12. Liefooghe, B., Barrouillet, P., Vandierendonck, A., & Camos, V. (2008). Working memory costs of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 478-494.
13. Logan, G. D. (2004). Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 218-236.
14. Logan, G. D. (2007). What it costs to implement a plan: Plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs. Memory & Cognition, 35, 591-602.
15. Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93-99.
16. Mayr, U. (2007). Inhibition of task sets. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
18. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
19. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
20. Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2005). Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1325-1338.
21. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
22. Schneider, D. W. (2007). Task-set inhibition in chunked task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 970-976.
23. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367.
24. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2007). Defining task-set reconfiguration: The case of reference point switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 118-125.
25. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
26. Verbruggen, F., Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (in press). How to stop and change a response: The role of goal activation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.