What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: Tasks or cues?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 794-799

  Maye, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847681359     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193999     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. BRASS, M., & VON CRAMON, D. Y. (2002). The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 908-914.
2. BRYCK, R. L., GORDON, K. B. C., & MAYR, U. (2004, April). Neural correlates of cue-switching and task-switching. Poster presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting, San Francisco.
3. GOTLER, A., MEIRAN, N., & TZELGOV, J. (2003). Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 890-896.
4. JOST, K., MAYR, U., & RÖSLER, F. (2006). Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs. Manuscript in preparation.
5. KOCH, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1474-1486.
6. LOGAN, G. D., & BUNDESEN, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 29, 575-599.
7. LOGAN, G. D., & BUNDESEN, C. (2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 832-840.
8. MAYR, U., & BELL, T. (2006). On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science 17, 774-780.
9. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
10. MAYR, U., & KLIEGL, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 362-372.
11. MEIRAN, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
12. MONSELL, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
13. MONSELL, S., & MIZON, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 493-516.
14. PHILIPP. A. M., & KOCH, I. (2006). Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 624-639.
15. SCHNEIDER, D. W., & LOGAN, G. D. (2006). Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 145-151.