Task switching and across-trial distance priming are independent

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-16

  Liefooghe, Baptist ^a   Verbruggen, Frederick ^a   Vandierendonck, André ^a   Fias, Wim ^a   Gevers, Wim ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; MENTAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33750519264     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440500492033     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). 'Task-switching', stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
4. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
5. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89, 1-81.
6. Koechlin, E., Naccache, L., Block, E., & Dehaene, S. (1999). Primed numbers: Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1882-1905.
7. Liefooghe, B., Vandierendonck, A., Muyllaert, I., Verbruggen, F., & Vanneste, S. (2005). The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition. Memory, 13, 550-560.
8. Logan, G. D. (2004). Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 218-236.
9. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
10. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 832-840.
11. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
12. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
13. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
14. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
15. Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 63, 250-264.
16. Oriet, C., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1036-1049.
17. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
18. Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition, 72, 191-201.
19. Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 107-112.
20. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
21. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
22. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1404-1419.
23. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
24. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566-582.
25. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
26. Stevens, M., Lammertyn, J., Verbruggen, F., & Vandierendonck, A. (in press). Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods.
27. Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cueing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89-103.
28. Sumner, P., & Ahmed, L. (2006). Task switching: The effect of task recency with dual and single affordance stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1255-1276.
29. Verguts, T., Fias, W., & Stevens, M. (2005). A model of exact small-number representation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 66-80.
30. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic S-R bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
31. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2004). Semantic generalizations of stimulus-task bindings. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1027-1033.
32. Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs". Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.
33. Wylie, G. R., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Response requirements in task switching. Neuroreport, 15, 1079-1087.