Task selection cost asymmetry without task switching

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 128-134

  Bryck, Richard L ^a   Mayr, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 50949109485     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.1.128     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ALLPORT, A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MiT Press.
2. ALLPORT, A., & WYLIE, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. ALTMANN, E. M. (2002). Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 287-297.
4. CRAIK, F. I. M., GOVONI, R., NAVEH- BENJAMIN, M., & ANDERSON, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
5. ERLEBACHER, A. (1977). Design and analysis of experiments contrasting the within- and between-subjects manipulation of the independent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 212-219.
6. GILBERT, S. J., & SHALLICE, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
7. GOPHER, D., ARMONY, L., & GREENSHPAN, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 308-339.
8. GOTTSDANKER, R. (1979). A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 208-215.
9. HAZY,T. E., FRANK, M. J., & O'REILLY, R. C. (2006). Banishing the homunculus: Making working memory work. Neuroscience, 139, 105-118.
10. LIEN, M.-C, & RUTHRUFF, E. (2004). Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 697-713.
11. LOGAN, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
12. LOGAN, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1-35.
13. MAYR, U., & BRYCK, R. L. (2005). Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition, 31, 337-350.
14. MAYR, U., & KLIEGL, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
15. MAYR, U., & KLIEGL, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 362-372.
16. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
17. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
18. YEUNG, N., & MONSELL, S. (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 455-469.