The role of temporal cue-target overlap in backward inhibition under task switching

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 749-754

  Druey, Michel D ^a   Hübner, Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348878084     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196832     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory. & Cognition, 31, 1030-1042.
2. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D., & FRANK, J. (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33-41.
3. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D., & WOODWARD, T. S. (2002). The influence of cuetask association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 18-29.
4. DREHER, J.-C., & BERMAN, K. F. (2002). Fractionating die neural substrate of cognitive control processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 14595-14600.
5. DREHER, J.-C., KOHN, P. D., & BERMAN, K. (2001). The neural basis of backward inhibition during task switching. Neurolmage, 13, 311.
6. GADE, M., & KOCH, I. (2005). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 530-534.
7. HÜBNER, M., DREISBACH, G., HAMER, H., & KLUWE, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 289-297.
8. MAYR, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93-99.
9. MAYR, U., DIEDRICHSEN, J., IVRY, R., & KEELE, S. W. (2006). Dissociating task-set selection from task-set inhibition in the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 14-21.
10. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
11. MAYR, U., & KUEGL, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 29, 362-372.
12. MONSELL, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
13. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
14. SCHUCH, S., & KOCH, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 92-105.