Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 101, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 379-394

  De Jong, Ritske ^a   Berendsen, Erna ^a   Cools, Roshan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Competence; Goals

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); GOALS; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0033113278     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00012-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders, Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Allport, D. A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner, Foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting attentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta, & M. Moscovitch, Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. De Jong, R. (in press). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver, Attention and performance XVIII: Cognitive control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. De Jong, R. (submitted). A viable alternative to the dual-process model? Reply to Zhang and Kornblum.
6. De Jong, R., Emans, B., Eenshuistra, R., & Wagenmakers, E. -J. (submitted). Structural and strategical determinants of intentional task control.
7. De Jong, R., Schellekens, J., & Meyman, T. F. Ansatz (in preparation). Aufgabe and Einstellung in task switching.
8. Duncan, J. (1995). Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes. In M. S. Gazzaniga, The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
10. Grice, R. D. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review, 75, 359-373.
11. Hartley, A. A. (1992). Attention. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse, The handbook of aging and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. (1991). Analysis of reaction time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340-347.
13. Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
14. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
15. Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491-512.
16. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli. Memory and Cognition, 7, 166-174.
17. MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
18. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce, Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
19. Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders, Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davison, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro, Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Plenum Press.
21. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
22. Simon, H. A. (1994). The bottleneck of attention: Connecting thought with motivation. In D. Spaulding (Ed.), Integrative views on motivation, cognition, and emotion: The Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 41. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
23. Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with demantia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461-479.
24. Stuss, D. T., Shallice, T., & Picton, T. W. (1995). A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. In J. Grafman, K. J. Holyoak, Structure and functions of the human prefrontal cortex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 769 (pp. 191-211). New York: Academy of Sciences.
25. Woodworth, R. S. (1918). Dynamic psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
26. Yantis, S., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the basis of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 135-149.