Automatic activation of task-related representations in task shifting

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 138-155

  Steinhauser, Marco ^a   Hübner, Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 34247551614     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195950     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ALLPORT, D.A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
2. ALLPORT, [D.] A., & WYLIE, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273-296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. ALLPORT, [D.] A., & WYLIE, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
4. ALTMANN, E. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done? Psychological Science, 15, 616-622.
5. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
6. HUBNER, R. (1997). The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 187-201.
7. HUBNER, R. (2000). Attention shifting between global and local target levels: The persistence of level-repetition effects. Visual Cognition, 7, 465-484.
8. HUBNER, R., FUTTERER, T., & STEINHAUSER, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 27, 640-653.
9. LOGAN, G. D., & GORDON, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
10. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
11. MAYR, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93-99.
12. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
13. MEIRAN, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
14. MEIRAN, N., & MARCIANO, H. (2002). Limitations in advance task preparation: Switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 30, 540-550.
15. MONSELL, S., TAYLOR, T. J., & MURPHY, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29, 137-151.
16. NAVON, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
17. PHAF, R. H., VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H., & HUDSON, P. T. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.
18. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
19. SOHN, M.-H., & ANDERSON, J. R. (2003). Stimulus-related priming during task switching. Memory & Cognition, 31, 775-780.
20. STEINHAUSER, M., & HUBNER, R. (2005). Mixing costs in task shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multicomponent task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1484-1494.
21. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
22. TORNAY, F. J., & MILAN, E. G. (2001). A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 785-803.
23. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, [D.] A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
24. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, [D.] A. (2005). Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Memory & Cognition, 33, 595-610.