Task switching: The effect of task recency with dual- and single-affordance stimuli

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1255-1276

  Sumner, Petroc ^a,b   Ahmed, Lubna ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33745098938     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980543000187     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273-296). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. (2004). Episodic and semantic components of the compound stimulus strategy in the explicit task cuing procedure. Memory and Cognition, 32, 956-964.
5. De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 468-483.
7. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task-switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
8. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift [Whole issue]. Archives of Psychology, 89.
10. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
11. Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 93-99.
12. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
13. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2, 1423-1442.
14. Meiran, N. (2000a). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
15. Meiran, N. (2000b). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377-399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
17. Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, D. A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25-40.
18. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
19. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory and Cognition, 31, 327-342.
20. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
21. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1404-1419.
22. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 92-105.
23. Sohn, M.-H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764-778.
24. Sohn, M.-H., & Carlson, R. A. (2000). Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1445-1460.
25. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
26. Tornay, F. J., & Milan, E. G. (2001). A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable switch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 785-803.
27. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic bindings in task shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
28. Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003a). The effects of recent practice on task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 919-936.
29. Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003b). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 455-469.