Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 923-927

  Hunt, Amelia R ^a,c   Ishigami, Yoko ^b   Klein, Raymond M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847676208     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194020     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. ALLPORT, D. A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
2. ALTMANN, E. M. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done? Psychological Science, 15, 616-622.
3. ARRINGTON, C. M., & LOGAN, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610-615.
4. BARTON, J. J. S., GREENZANG, C., HEFTER, R., EDELMAN, J., & MANOACH, D. S. (2006). Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 76-87.
5. CHERKASOVA, M. V., MANOACH, D. S., I NTRILIGATOR, J. M., & BARTON, J. J. S. (2002). Antisaccades and task-switching: Interactions in controlled processing. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 528-537.
6. DASSONVILLE, P., LEWIS, S. M., FOSTER, H. E., & ASHE, J. (1999). Choice and stimulus - response compatibility affect duration of response selection. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 235-240.
7. FITTS, P. M., & POSNER, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
8. GREENWALD, A. G. (1970). A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 20-25.
9. GREENWALD, A. G. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 52-57.
10. HODGSON, T. L., GOLDING, C., MOLYVA, D., ROSENTHAL, C. R., & KENNARD, C. (2004). Eye movements during task switching: Reflexive, symbolic, and affective contributions to response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 318-330.
11. HUNT, A. R., & KLEIN, R. M. (2002). Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration. Memory & Cognition, 30, 529-539.
12. LEONARD, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reactions: I. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 76-83.
13. LOGAN, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
14. MANOACH, D. S., LINDGREN, K. A., CHERKASOVA, M. V., GOFF, D. C., HALPERN, E. F., INTRILIGATOR, J., & BARTON, J. J. S. (2002). Schizophrenic subjects show deficient inhibition but intact task switching on saccadic tasks. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 816-826.
15. MASSON, M. E. J. (2004). Correction to Masson and Loftus (2003). Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 289.
16. MASSON, M. E. J., & LOFTUS, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
17. MEIRAN, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
18. MEIRAN, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
19. PASHLER, H., CARRIER, M., & HOFFMAN, J. (1993). Saccadic eye movements and dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 51-82.
20. PASHLER, H., JOLICŒUR, P., DELL'ACQUA, R., CREBOLDER, J., GOSCHKE, T., DE JONG, R., ET AL. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 275-423). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
22. WYLIE, G., & ALLPORT, [D.] A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs." Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.
23. YEUNG, N., & MONSELL, S. (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 455-469.