Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching

Brain Research

Volumn 1157, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 56-65

  Mueller, S C ^a   Swainson, R ^a   Jackson, G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; ERPs; N1; P3; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34250708867     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.046     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adam J.J., Hommel B., and Umilta C. Preparing for perception and action (i): The role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm. Cogn. Psychol. 46 (2003) 302-358
2. Allport A., Styles E., and Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umilta C., and Moscovitch M. (Eds). Attention and Performance XV (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge 421-452
3. Arbuthnott K.D. The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. J. Exper. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31 (2005) 1030-1042
4. Astle D.E., Jackson G.M., and Swainson R. Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: an ERP study of task switching. Brain Res. 1125 (2006) 94-103
5. Astle, D.E., Jackson, G.M., Swainson R., in press. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change of task:A dense sensor ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
6. Brass M., Ruge H., Meiran N., Rubin O., Koch I., Zysset S., Prinz W., and von Cramon Y.D. When the same response has different meanings: recoding the response meaning in the lateral prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 1026-1031
7. Cui R.Q., Egkher A., Huter D., Lang W., Lindinger G., and Deecke L. High resolution spatiotemporal analysis of the contingent negative variation in simple or complex motor tasks and a non-motor task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 (2000) 1847-1859
8. DeJong R., Wierda M., Mulder G., and Mulder L.J.M. Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14 (1988) 682-692
9. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W., and Ward R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7 (1997) 255-261
10. Eimer M. ERP modulations indicate the selective processing of visual stimuli as a result of transient and sustained spatial attention. Psychophysiology 33 (1996) 13-21
11. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J., and Kleinsorge T. Short-term mobilization of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 40 (2003) 914-923
12. Gratton G., Coles M., and Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55 (1983) 468-484
13. Handy T.C., and Mangun G.R. Attention and spatial selection: electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load. Percept. Psychophys. 62 (2000) 175-186
14. Hick W.E. On the rate of gain of information. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 4 (1952) 11-26
15. Hübner M., Kluwe R.H., Luna-Rodriguez A., and Peters A. Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: No evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 30 (2004) 1043-1063
16. Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J. Exp. Psychol. 45 (1953) 188-196
17. Karayanidis F., Coltheart M., Michie P.T., and Murphy K. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology 40 (2003) 329-348
18. Kieffaber P.D., and Hetrick W.P. Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 56-71
19. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
20. Kornblum S. Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychon. Sci. 2 (1965) 55-56
21. Lhermitte F. 'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 106 (1983) 237-255
22. Lorist M.M., Klein M., Nieuwenhuis S., DeJong R., Mulder G., and Meijman T.F. Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 614-625
23. Luck S.J., Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R., and Hillyard S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75 (1990) 528-542
24. Luu P., and Ferree T. Determination of the HydroCel geodesic sensor nets' average electrode positions and their 10-10 international equivalents. Technical note: Electrical Geodesics, Inc. (2005)
25. Mangun G.R., and Hillyard S.A. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17 (1991) 1057-1074
26. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Control of Cognitive Processes, Attention and Performance XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge 377-399
27. Meiran N., Gotler A., and Perlman A. Old age is associated with a pattern of relatively intact and relatively impaired task-set switching abilities. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 56 2 (2001) 88-102
28. Miller J. Discrete versus continuous models of human information processing: In search of partial output. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8 (1982) 273-296
29. Milner B. Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Arch. Neurol. 9 (1963) 90-100
30. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 (2003) 134-140
31. Mueller, S.C., 2006. Contributions of task and response-level factors to the asymmetrical switch cost. PhD thesis. University of Nottingham. Nottingham.
32. Nicholson R., Karayanidis F., Poboka D., Heathcote A., and Michie P.T. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 540-554
33. Pashler H., and Baylis G. Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. J. Exper. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17 (1991) 33-48
34. Poulsen C., Luu P., Davey C., and Tucker D.M. Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials. Cogn. Brain Res. 24 (2005) 133-154
35. Reason J.T. Lapses of attention. In: Parasuraman R., Davies R., and Beatty J. (Eds). Varieties of Attention (1984), Academic Press, Orlando 515-549
36. Rogers R.D., and Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124 (1995) 207-231
37. Rosler F., Heil M., and Roder B. Slow negative brain potentials as reflections of specific modular resources of cognition. Biol. Psychol. 45 1-3 (1997) 109-141
38. Rubin O., and Meiran N. On the origins of the task mixing costin the cuing task-switching paradigm. J. Exper. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31 (2005) 1477-1491
39. Rugg M.D., Doyle M.C., and Melan C. An event-related potential study of the effects of within and across-modality word responses. Lang. Cogn. Processes 8 (1993) 357-377
40. Rushworth M.F., Passingham R.E., and Nobre A.C. Components of switching intentional set. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 8 (2002) 1139-1150
41. Schuch S., and Koch I. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29 (2003) 92-105
42. Swainson R., Cunnington R., Jackson G.M., Rorden C., Peters A.M., Morris P.G., and Jackson S.R. Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: evidence from repeated task-switching. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 785-799
43. Swainson R., Jackson S.R., and Jackson G.M. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: an ERP study of task-switching. Brain Res. 1105 (2006) 61-72
44. Tucker D.M. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 87 (1993) 154-163
45. Vogel E.K., and Luck S.J. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 190-203
46. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., and Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 203 (1964) 380-384
47. Woldorff M.G., and Hillyard S.A. Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 79 (1991) 170-191
48. Wylie G., and Allport A. Task switching: a high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 2322-2342