The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 383-392

  Dreisbach, Gesine ^a   Goschke, Thomas ^a   Haider, Hilde ^b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MOTIVATION; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VOCABULARY;

EID: 34250897578     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0041-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allport A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Altmann, E. M. (2004a). Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done? Psychological Science, 15, 616-622.
4. Altmann, E. M. (2004b). The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 32, 153-163.
5. Arrington, C., & Logan, G. D. (2004). Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition, 32, 965-978.
6. Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575-589.
7. Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2005). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (in press).
8. Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 468-483.
9. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
10. Gopher, D., Armony, L., & Greenshpan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 308-339.
11. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V., & Kleinsorge, T. (2001). Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 967-983.
13. Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227-246.
14. Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 640-653.
15. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology (Whole No. 89).
16. Kleinsorge, T. (2003). Globale Determinanten lokaler Kosten bei Aufgabenwechseln. Psychologische Rundschau, 54, 217-224.
17. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
18. Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2004). Assembling a task space: Global determination of local shift costs. Psychological Research, 68, 31-40.
19. Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1474-1486.
20. Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 488-492.
21. Koch, I. (2005). Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 107-112
22. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
23. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
24. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
25. Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2005). Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 337-350.
26. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
27. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
28. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
29. Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task-sets: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 63, 250-264.
31. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). 1. Locus of practice effects in speeded choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 20-32.
32. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
33. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
34. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1404-1419.
35. Sepctor, A., & Biedermann, L. (1975). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
36. Sohn, M. H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764-778.
37. Sohn, M. H., & Carlson, R. A. (2000). Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1445-1460.
38. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2003). Executive control and task switching in monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1357-1364.
39. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
40. Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs". Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.