Switching of response modalities

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1325-1338

  Philipp, Andrea M ^a   Koch, Iring ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; REVIEW;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 27544460595     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000656     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Arbuthnott, K., & Frank, J. (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33-41.
2. Arbuthnott, K., & Woodward, T. S. (2002). The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 18-29.
3. Dreher, J. C., & Berman, K. F. (2002). Fractionating the neural substrate of cognitive control processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 99, 14595-14600.
4. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (in press). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
5. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDF model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
6. Hahn, S., Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. F. (2003). Multidimensional set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 503-509.
7. Hübner, M., Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 289-297.
8. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multidimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
9. Koch, I., Gade, M., & Philipp, A. M. (2004). Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 51, 51-57.
10. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
11. Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., Woodward, T. S., & Chan, J. C. K. (2003). Modulation of word-reading processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 400-418.
12. Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96-109.
13. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
14. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
15. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes on task-set selection cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
16. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to fask performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
17. Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
18. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134-140.
19. Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (in press). Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
20. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
21. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of judgment sets in judgment shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.