Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 679-689

  Ravid, Tommer ^a   Hochstrasser, Mark ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; GLYCOSIDASE; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE; HYPOXIA INDUCIBLE FACTOR 1; PROTEASOME; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

BIOSYNTHESIS; DEGRON; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; EUKARYOTE; HYDROPHOBICITY; OXIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; YEAST CELL;

ANIMALS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; HUMANS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 50149086108     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm2468     Document Type: Review

References (147)

1. Schimke, R. T. & Doyle, D. Control of enzyme levels in animal tissues. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 39, 929-976 (1970).
2. Goldberg, A. L. & Dice, J. F. Intracellular protein degradation in mammalian and bacterial cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 43, 835-869 (1974).
3. Hochstrasser, M. Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 405-439 (1996).
4. Hershko, A. & Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425-479 (1998).
5. Pickart, C. M. & Cohen, R. E. Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 177-187 (2004). References 1-5 review the older literature on intracellular proteolysis and various features of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
6. Platt, T., Miller, J. H. & Weber, K. In vivo degradation of mutant lac repressor. Nature 228, 1154-1156 (1970).
7. Rabinovitz, M. Translational repression in the control of globin chain initiation by hemin. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 241, 322-333 (1974).
8. Dice, J. F. & Goldberg, A. L. Relationship between in vivo degradative rates and isoelectric points of proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 3893-3897 (1975).
9. Dice, J. F., Hess, E. J. & Goldberg, A. L. Studies on the relationship between the degradative rates of proteins in vivo and their isoelectric points. Biochem. J. 178, 305-312 (1979).
10. Varshavsky, A. Naming a targeting signal. Cell 64, 13-15 (1991).
11. Lahav-Baratz, S., Sudakin, V., Ruderman, J. V. & Hershko, A. Reversible phosphorylation controls the activity of cyclosome-associated cyclin-ubiquitin ligase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9303-9307 (1995).
12. Turner, G. C., Du, F. & Varshavsky, A. Peptides accelerate their uptake by activating a ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. Nature 405, 579-583 (2000).
13. Tan, X. et al. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature 446, 640-645 (2007).
14. Hershko, A., Ciechanover, A., Heller, H., Haas, A. L. & Rose, I. A. Proposed role of ATP in protein breakdown: conjugation of protein with multiple chains of the polypeptide of ATP-dependent proteolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 1783-1786 (1980).
15. Hershko, A., Heller, H., Eytan, E. & Reiss, Y. The protein substrate binding site of the ubiquitin-protein ligase system. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11992-11999 (1986).
16. Hershko, A., Leshinsky, E., Ganoth, D. & Heller, H. ATP-dependent degradation of ubiquitin-protein conjugates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1619-1623 (1984).
17. Bachmair, A., Finley, D. & Varshavsky, A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234, 179-186 (1986). Shows the importance of the N-terminal amino acid in targeting specific substrates for ubiquitin-dependent turnover.
18. Bartel, B., Wunning, I. & Varshavsky, A. The recognition component of the N-end rule pathway. EMBO J. 9, 3179-3189 (1990).
19. Mogk, A., Schmidt, R. & Bukau, B. The N-end rule pathway for regulated proteolysis: prokaryotic and eukaryotic strategies. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 165-172 (2007).
20. Lupas, A. N. & Koretke, K. K. Bioinformatic analysis of ClpS, a protein module involved in prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein degradation. J. Struct. Biol. 141, 77-83 (2003).
21. Erbse, A. et al. ClpS is an essential component of the N-end rule pathway in Escherichia coli. Nature 439, 753-756 (2006).
22. Rao, H., Uhlmann, F., Nasmyth, K. & Varshavsky, A. Degradation of a cohesin subunit by the N-end rule pathway is essential for chromosome stability. Nature 410, 955-959 (2001).
23. Balzi, E., Choder, M., Chen, W. N., Varshavsky, A. & Goffeau, A. Cloning and functional analysis of the arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase gene ATE1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 7464-7471 (1990).
24. Ciechanover, A. et al. Purification and characterization of arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase from rabbit reticulocytes. Its involvement in post-translational modification and degradation of acidic NH2 termini substrates of the ubiquitin pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 11155-11167 (1988).
25. Davydov, I. V. & Varshavsky, A. RGS4 is arginylated and degraded by the N-end rule pathway in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22931-22941 (2000).
26. Hu, R. G. et al. The N-end rule pathway as a nitric oxide sensor controlling the levels of multiple regulators. Nature 437, 981-986 (2005).
27. Lee, M. J. et al. RGS4 and RGS5 are in vivo substrates of the N-end rule pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15030-15035 (2005).
28. Wong, C. C. et al. Global analysis of posttranslational protein arginylation. PLoS Biol. 5, e258 (2007).
29. Tasaki, T. & Kwon, Y. T. The mammalian N-end rule pathway: new insights into its components and physiological roles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 520-528 (2007).
30. Tasaki, T. et al. A family of mammalian E3 ubiquitin ligases that contain the UBR box motif and recognize N-degrons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 7120-7136 (2005).
31. de Groot, R. J., Rümenapf, T., Kuhn, R. J., Strauss, E. G. & Strauss, J. H. Sindbis virus RNA polymerase is degraded by the N-end rule pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8967-8971 (1991).
32. Kwon, Y. T. et al. An essential role of N-terminal arginylation in cardiovascular development. Science 297, 96-99 (2002).
33. Zenker, M. et al. Deficiency of UBR1, a ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway, causes pancreatic dysfunction, malformations and mental retardation (Johanson-Blizzard syndrome). Nature Genet. 37, 1345-1350 (2005).
34. Cdc4 and gives a model for how multisite phosphorylation controls SCF substrate ubiquitylation.
35. Min, J. H. et al. Structure of an HIF-1α -pVHL complex: hydroxyproline recognition in signaling. Science. 296, 1886-1889 (2002).
36. β-TrCP1 ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 11, 1445-1456 (2003).
37. Cdc4 ubiquitin ligase. Cell 112, 243-256 (2003).
38. Mizushima, T. et al. Structural basis of sugar-recognizing ubiquitin ligase. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 365-370 (2004).
39. Skp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature 416, 703-709 (2002).
40. Hao, B., Oehlmann, S., Sowa, M. E., Harper, J. W. & Pavletich, N. P. Structure of a Fbw7-Skp1-cyclin E complex: multisite-phosphorylated substrate recognition by SCF ubiquitin ligases. Mol. Cell 26, 131-143 (2007). Structural study that provides an alternative view of multisite phosphorylation and SCF substrate recognition.
41. Tyers, M. & Jorgensen, P. Proteolysis and the cell cycle: with this RING I do thee destroy. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 54-64 (2000).
42. Ang, X. L. & Harper, J. W. Interwoven ubiquitination oscillators and control of cell cycle transitions. Sci. STKE 2004, 2004, pe31 (2004).
43. Schwob, E., Bohm, T., Mendenhall, M. D. & Nasmyth, K. The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell 79, 233-244 (1994).
44. Winston, J. T. et al. The SCFβ-TrCP-ubiquitin ligase complex associates specifically with phosphorylated destruction motifs in IκBα and β-catenin and stimulates IκBα ubiquitination in vitro. Genes Dev. 13, 270-283 (1999).
45. Amati, B. & Vlach, J. Kip1 meets SKP2: new links in cell-cycle control. Nature Cell Biol. 1, E91-E93 (1999).
46. Sheaff, R. J., Groudine, M., Gordon, M., Roberts, J. M. & Clurman, B. E. Cyclin E-CDK2 is a regulator of p27Kip1. Genes Dev. 11, 1464-1478 (1997).
47. Spruck, C. H., Won, K. A. & Reed, S. I. Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosome instability. Nature 401, 297-300 (1999).
48. Klein, P., Pawson, T. & Tyers, M. Mathematical modeling suggests cooperative interactions between a disordered polyvalent ligand and a single receptor site. Curr. Biol. 13, 1669-1678 (2003).
49. Willems, A. R., Schwab, M. & Tyers, M. A hitchhiker's guide to the cullin ubiquitin ligases: SCF and its kin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1695, 133-170 (2004).
50. Semenza, G. L., Nejfelt, M. K., Chi, S. M. & Antonarakis, S. E. Hypoxia-inducible nuclear factors bind to an enhancer element located 3′ to the human erythropoietin gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 5680-5684 (1991).
51. Kamura, T., Conrad, M. N., Yan, Q., Conaway, R. C. & Conaway, J. W. The Rbx1 subunit of SCF and VHL E3 ubiquitin ligase activates Rub1 modification of cullins Cdc53 and Cul2. Genes Dev. 13, 2928-2933 (1999).
52. Kamura, T. et al. Rbx1, a component of the VHL tumor suppressor complex and SCF ubiquitin ligase. Science 284, 657-661 (1999).
53. 2 sensing. Science 292, 464-468 (2001).
54. 2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science 292, 468-472 (2001).
55. Epstein, A. C. et al. C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell 107, 43-54 (2001).
56. Hon, W. C. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of hydroxyproline in HIF-1 α by pVHL. Nature 417, 975-978 (2002). Provides detailed structural data on the interaction between hydroxylated HIF-1α and VHL.
57. Beroud, C. et al. Software and database for the analysis of mutations in the VHL gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 256-258 (1998).
58. Perry, J. J., Tainer, J. A. & Boddy, M. N. A SIMultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 201-208 (2008).
59. Hatakeyama, S. & Nakayama, K. I. Ubiquitylation as a quality control system for intracellular proteins. J. Biochem. 134, 1-8 (2003).
60. Laney, J. D. & Hochstrasser, M. Substrate targeting in the ubiquitin system. Cell 97, 427-430 (1999).
61. Hampton, R. Y. ER-associated degradation in protein quality control and cellular regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 476-482 (2002).
62. Kostova, Z. & Wolf, D. H. For whom the bell tolls: protein quality control of the endoplasmic reticulum and the ubiquitin-proteasome connection. EMBO J. 22, 2309-2317 (2003).
63. Sayeed, A. & Ng, D. T. Search and destroy: ER quality control and ER-associated protein degradation. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40, 75-91 (2005).
64. Meusser, B., Hirsch, C., Jarosch, E. & Sommer, T. ERAD: the long road to destruction. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 766-772 (2005). References 61-64 review the mechanisms of ER-associated degradation (ERAD).
65. Laney, J. D. & Hochstrasser, M. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the yeast Matα2 repressor enables a switch in developmental state. Genes Dev. 17, 2259-2270 (2003).
66. Chen, P., Johnson, P., Sommer, T., Jentsch, S. & Hochstrasser, M. Multiple ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes participate in the in vivo degradation of the yeast MATα2 repressor. Cell 74, 357-369 (1993).
67. Swanson, R., Locher, M. & Hochstrasser, M. A conserved ubiquitin ligase of the nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum that functions in both ER-associated and Matα2 repressor degradation. Genes Dev. 15, 2660-2674 (2001).
68. Ravid, T., Kreft, S. G. & Hochstrasser, M. Membrane and soluble substrates of the Doa10 ubiquitin ligase are degraded by distinct pathways. EMBO J. 25, 533-543 (2006).
69. Carvalho, P., Goder, V. & Rapoport, T. A. Distinct ubiquitin-ligase complexes define convergent pathways for the degradation of ER proteins. Cell 126, 361-373 (2006).
70. Neuber, O., Jarosch, E., Volkwein, C., Walter, J. & Sommer, T. Ubx2 links the Cdc48 complex to ER-associated protein degradation. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 993-998 (2005).
71. Johnson, P. R., Swanson, R., Rakhilina, L. & Hochstrasser, M. Degradation signal masking by heterodimerization of MATα2 and MATa1 blocks their mutual destruction by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cell 94, 217-227 (1998). Characterizes the Deg1 degron of Matα2 and physiological regulation of degron recognition by changes in protein quaternary structure.
72. Arteaga, M. F., Wang, L., Ravid, T., Hochstrasser, M. & Canessa, C. M. An amphipathic helix targets serum and glucocorticoid-induced kinase 1 to the endoplasmic reticulum-associated ubiquitin-conjugation machinery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11178-11183 (2006).
73. Gilon, T., Chomsky, O. & Kulka, R. G. Degradation signals for ubiquitin system proteolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 17, 2759-2766 (1998).
74. Gilon, T., Chomsky, O. & Kulka, R. G. Degradation signals recognized by the Ubc6p-Ubc7p ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme pair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 7214-7219 (2000).
75. Ismail, N. & Ng, D. T. Have you HRD? Understanding ERAD is DOAble! Cell 126, 237-239 (2006).
76. Kostova, Z., Tsai, Y. C. & Weissman, A. M. Ubiquitin ligases, critical mediators of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 770-779 (2007).
77. Deng, M. & Hochstrasser, M. Spatially regulated ubiquitin ligation by an ER/nuclear membrane ligase. Nature 443, 827-831 (2006).
78. Vashist, S. & Ng, D. T. Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control. J. Cell Biol. 165, 41-52 (2004).
79. Wang, S. & Ng, D. T. W. Lectins sweet-talk proteins into ERAD. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 251-253 (2008).
80. Goldstein, J. L. & Brown, M. S. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 343, 425-430 (1990).
81. Liscum, L. et al. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase: a transmembrane glycoprotein of the endoplasmic reticulum with N-linked 'high-mannose' oligosaccharides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 7165-7169 (1983).
82. Liscum, L. et al. Domain structure of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, a glycoprotein of the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 522-530 (1985).
83. Chin, D. J. et al. Nucleotide sequence of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl- glutaryl coenzyme A reductase, a glycoprotein of endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 308, 613-617 (1984).
84. Gil, G., Faust, J. R., Chin, D. J., Goldstein, J. L. & Brown, M. S. Membrane-bound domain of HMG CoA reductase is required for sterol-enhanced degradation of the enzyme. Cell 41, 249-258 (1985).
85. Skalnik, D. G., Narita, H., Kent, C. & Simoni, R. D. The membrane domain of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase confers endoplasmic reticulum localization and sterol-regulated degradation onto beta-galactosidase. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6836-6841 (1988).
86. Hua, X., Sakai, J., Brown, M. S. & Goldstein, J. L. Regulated cleavage of sterol regulatory element binding proteins requires sequences on both sides of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10379-10384 (1996).
87. Loftus, S. K. et al. Murine model of Niemann-Pick C disease: mutation in a cholesterol homeostasis gene. Science 277, 232-235 (1997).
88. Burke, R. et al. Dispatched, a novel sterol-sensing domain protein dedicated to the release of cholesterol-modified hedgehog from signaling cells. Cell 99, 803-815 (1999). References 86-88 identify sterol sensing domains in the transmembrane regions of several integral membrane proteins.
89. Gardner, R. G. & Hampton, R. Y. A 'distributed degron' allows regulated entry into the ER degradation pathway. EMBO J. 18, 5994-6004 (1999).
90. Shearer, A. G. & Hampton, R. Y. Structural control of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation: effect of chemical chaperones on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 188-196 (2004).
91. Shearer, A. G. & Hampton, R. Y. Lipid-mediated, reversible misfolding of a sterol-sensing domain protein. EMBO J. 24, 149-159 (2005).
92. Ravid, T., Doolman, R., Avner, R., Harats, D. & Roitelman, J. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway mediates the regulated degradation of mammalian 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35840-35847 (2000).
93. Yang, T. et al. Crucial step in cholesterol homeostasis: sterols promote binding of SCAP to INSIG-1, a membrane protein that facilitates retention of SREBPs in ER. Cell 110, 489-500 (2002). Reports the discovery of INSIG1, a sterol-sensing protein.
94. Song, B. L., Sever, N. & DeBose-Boyd, R. A. Gp78, a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase, associates with Insig-1 and couples sterol-regulated ubiquitination to degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Mol. Cell 19, 829-840 (2005).
95. Lee, J. N., Song, B., DeBose-Boyd, R. A. & Ye, J. Sterol-regulated degradation of Insig-1 mediated by the membrane-bound ubiquitin ligase gp78. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 39308-39315 (2006).
96. Yoshida, Y. A novel role for N-glycans in the ERAD system. J. Biochem. 134, 183-190 (2003).
97. Gauss, R., Jarosch, E., Sommer, T. & Hirsch, C. A complex of Yos9p and the HRD ligase integrates endoplasmic reticulum quality control into the degradation machinery. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 849-854 (2006).
98. Szathmary, R., Bielmann, R., Nita-Lazar, M., Burda, P. & Jakob, C. A. Yos9 protein is essential for degradation of misfolded glycoproteins and may function as lectin in ERAD. Mol. Cell 19, 765-775 (2005).
99. Kim, W., Spear, E. D. & Ng, D. T. Yos9p detects and targets misfolded glycoproteins for ER-associated degradation. Mol. Cell 19, 753-764 (2005).
100. Bhamidipati, A., Denic, V., Quan, E. M. & Weissman, J. S. Exploration of the topological requirements of ERAD identifies Yos9p as a lectin sensor of misfolded glycoproteins in the ER lumen. Mol. Cell 19, 741-751 (2005). References 97-100 identify YOS9 as a lectin that detects misfolded glycoproteins in the ER lumen.
101. FBS1 recognizes the chitobiose domain in the oligosaccharide base of misfolded glycoproteins in the cytosol.
102. Helenius, A. Quality control in the secretory assembly line. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 356, 147-150 (2001).
103. Spiro, R. G. Role of N-linked polymannose oligosaccharides in targeting glycoproteins for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61, 1025-1041 (2004).
104. Yoshida, Y. et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase that recognizes sugar chains. Nature 418, 438-442 (2002). Identifies FBS1 as a new sugar-binding F-box subunit of the SCF E3 ligase family.
105. Yoshida, Y., Adachi, E., Fukiya, K., Iwai, K. & Tanaka, K. Glycoprotein-specific ubiquitin ligases recognize N-glycans in unfolded substrates. EMBO Rep. 6, 239-244 (2005).
106. Nakatsukasa, K. & Brodsky, J. L. The recognition and retrotranslocation of misfolded proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Traffic 9, 861-870 (2008).
107. Murata, S., Minami, Y., Minami, M., Chiba, T. & Tanaka, K. CHIP is a chaperone-dependent E3 ligase that ubiquitylates unfolded protein. EMBO Rep. 2, 1133-1138 (2001). Shows that CHIP specifically ubiquitylates misfolded substrates in the presence of HSP70 family members.
108. McDonough, H. & Patterson, C. CHIP: a link between the chaperone and proteasome systems. Cell Stress Chaperones 8, 303-308 (2003).
109. Jiang, J. et al. CHIP is a U-box-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase: identification of Hsc70 as a target for ubiquitylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42938-42944 (2001).
110. Meacham, G. C., Patterson, C., Zhang, W., Younger, J. M. & Cyr, D. M. The Hsc70 co-chaperone CHIP targets immature CFTR for proteasomal degradation. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 100-105 (2001).
111. Connell, P. et al. The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat-shock proteins. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 93-96 (2001).
112. Sahara, N. et al. In vivo evidence of CHIP up-regulation attenuating τ aggregation. J. Neurochem. 94, 1254-1263 (2005).
113. Hatakeyama, S., Matsumoto, M., Yada, M. & Nakayama, K. I. Interaction of U-box-type ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) with molecular chaperones. Genes Cells 9, 533-548 (2004).
114. Miller, V. M. et al. CHIP suppresses polyglutamine aggregation and toxicity in vitro and in vivo. J. Neurosci. 25, 9152-9161 (2005).
115. Younger, J. M. et al. Sequential quality-control checkpoints triage misfolded cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. Cell 126, 571-582 (2006).
116. Rosser, M. F., Washburn, E., Muchowski, P. J., Patterson, C. & Cyr, D. M. Chaperone functions of the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 22267-22277 (2007).
117. Bachmair, A. & Varshavsky, A. The degradation signal in a short-lived protein. Cell 56, 1019-1032 (1989).
118. Chau, V. et al. A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science 243, 1576-1583 (1989).
119. Huang, T. T., Wuerzberger-Davis, S. M., Wu, Z. H. & Miyamoto, S. Sequential modification of NEMO/IKKγ by SUMO-1 and ubiquitin mediates NF-κB activation by genotoxic stress. Cell 115, 565-576 (2003).
120. Scherer, D. C., Brockman, J. A., Chen, Z., Maniatis, T. & Ballard, D. W. Signal-induced degradation of Iκ Bα requires site-specific ubiquitination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 11259-11263 (1995).
121. Baldi, L., Brown, K., Franzoso, G. & Siebenlist, U. Critical role for lysines 21 and 22 in signal-induced, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of I κ B-α. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 376-379 (1996).
122. Petroski, M. D. & Deshaies, R. J. Redundant degrons ensure the rapid destruction of Sic1 at the G1/S transition of the budding yeast cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2, 410-411 (2003).
123. Banerjee, A., Gregori, L., Xu, Y. & Chau, V. The bacterially expressed yeast CDC34 gene product can undergo autoubiquitination to form a multiubiquitin chain-linked protein. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5668-5675 (1993).
124. Fung, T. K., Yam, C. H. & Poon, R. Y. The N-terminal regulatory domain of cyclin A contains redundant ubiquitination targeting sequences and acceptor sites. Cell Cycle 4, 1411-1420 (2005).
125. Kirkpatrick, D. S. et al. Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 700-710 (2006).
126. King, R. W., Glotzer, M. & Kirschner, M. W. Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and the structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1343-1357 (1996).
127. Machida, Y. J. et al. UBE2T is the E2 in the Fanconi anemia pathway and undergoes negative autoregulation. Mol. Cell 23, 589-596 (2006). Shows that mono-ubiquitylation of UBE2T near its catalytic site hinders activity of the E2 enzyme.
128. Lin, Y., Hwang, W. C. & Basavappa, R. Structural and functional analysis of the human mitotic-specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, UbcH10. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 21913-21921 (2002).
129. Hodgins, R., Gwozd, C., Arnason, T., Cummings, M. & Ellison, M. J. The tail of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme redirects multi-ubiquitin chain synthesis from the lysine 48-linked configuration to a novel nonlysine-linked form. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28766-28771 (1996).
130. Ravid, T. & Hochstrasser, M. Autoregulation of an E2 enzyme by ubiquitin-chain assembly on its catalytic residue. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 422-427 (2007). Demonstrates that a polyubiquitin chain attached to the catalytic Cys residue of an E2 enzyme can act as a degron.
131. Ciechanover, A. & Ben-Saadon, R. N-terminal ubiquitination: more protein substrates join in. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 103-106 (2004).
132. Bloom, J., Amador, V., Bartolini, F., DeMartino, G. & Pagano, M. Proteasome-mediated degradation of p21 via N-terminal ubiquitinylation. Cell 115, 71-82 (2003).
133. INK4a and the human papillomavirus oncoprotein-58 E7 are naturally occurring lysineless proteins that are degraded by the ubiquitin system. Direct evidence for ubiquitination at the N-terminal residue. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 41414-41421 (2004).
134. Li, W., Tu, D., Brunger, A. T. & Ye, Y. A ubiquitin ligase transfers preformed polyubiquitin chains from a conjugating enzyme to a substrate. Nature 446, 333-337 (2007). Shows that the attachment of a polyubiquitin chain on the catalytic Cys of an E2 enzyme is an intermediate step in substrate ubiquitylation.
135. Cadwell, K. & Coscoy, L. Ubiquitination on nonlysine residues by a viral E3 ubiquitin ligase. Science 309, 127-130 (2005). Shows that ubiquitin covalently attached to a Cys residue in a substrate can target it for degradation.
136. Wang, X. et al. Ubiquitination of serine, threonine, or lysine residues on the cytoplasmic tail can induce ERAD of MHC-I by viral E3 ligase mK3. J. Cell Biol. 177, 613-624 (2007).
137. Elsasser, S. et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn1 binds ubiquitin-like protein domains. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 725-730 (2002).
138. Alberti, S. et al. Ubiquitylation of BAG-1 suggests a novel regulatory mechanism during the sorting of chaperone substrates to the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 45920-45927 (2002).
139. Rao, H. & Sastry, A. Recognition of specific ubiquitin conjugates is important for the proteolytic functions of the ubiquitin-associated domain proteins Dsk2 and Rad23. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11691-11695 (2002).
140. Thrower, J. S., Hoffman, L., Rechsteiner, M. & Pickart, C. M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 19, 94-102 (2000).
141. Lee, C., Schwartz, M. P., Prakash, S., Iwakura, M. & Matouschek, A. ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. Mol. Cell 7, 627-637 (2001). Shows that the ability of a protein to be degraded depends on the position of the degron within the protein structure and its ability to initiate unfolding.
142. Takeuchi, J., Chen, H. & Coffino, P. Proteasome substrate degradation requires association plus extended peptide. EMBO J. 26, 123-131 (2007).
143. Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. The U box is a modified RING finger - a common domain in ubiquitination. Curr. Biol. 10, R132-R134 (2000). Reports the discovery of the U-box motif.
144. Welchman, R. L., Gordon, C. & Mayer, R. J. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 599-609 (2005).
145. Petroski, M. D. & Deshaies, R. J. Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 9-20 (2005).
146. Schulman, B. A. et al. Insights into SCF ubiquitin ligases from the structure of the Skp1-Skp2 complex. Nature 408, 381-386 (2000).
147. Skp2 ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 20, 9-19 (2005).