Immunology Driven by Large-Scale Single-Cell Sequencing

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2019, Pages 1011-1021

  Gomes, Tomás ^a   Teichmann, Sarah A ^a,b,c   Talavera López, Carlos ^a,b  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIG DATA; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL INTERACTION; CELL POPULATION; GENE CONTROL; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; IMMUNOLOGY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CELL COMMUNICATION; DATA BASE; DEVICES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMAN; IMMUNE SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECEPTOR CROSS-TALK; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES AS TOPIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; IMMUNE SYSTEM; PRECISION MEDICINE; RECEPTOR CROSS-TALK; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 85073825616     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2019.09.004     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Svensson, V., et al. Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq in the past decade. Nat. Protoc. 13 (2018), 599–604.
2. Svensson, V., da Veiga Beltrame, E., A curated database reveals trends in single cell transcriptomics. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/742304 Published online August 21, 2019.
3. Hardy, R.R., et al. B-cell subpopulations identified by two-colour fluorescence analysis. Nature 297 (1982), 589–591.
4. Suzuki, M.M., Bird, A., DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9 (2008), 465–476.
5. Hui, T., et al. High-resolution single-cell DNA methylation measurements reveal epigenetically distinct hematopoietic stem cell subpopulations. Stem Cell Rep. 11 (2018), 578–592.
6. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489 (2012), 57–74.
7. Buenrostro, J.D., et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature 523 (2015), 486–490.
8. Cusanovich, D.A., et al. Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 348 (2015), 910–914.
9. Chen, X., et al. A rapid and robust method for single cell chromatin accessibility profiling. Nat. Commun., 9, 2018, 5345.
10. Nagano, T., et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502 (2013), 59–64.
11. Kaya-Okur, H.S., et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun., 10, 2019, 30.
12. Wang, Q., et al. CoBATCH for high-throughput single-cell epigenomic profiling. Mol. Cell, 2019, 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.015 Published online August 27, 2019.
13. Budnik, B., et al. SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Genome Biol., 19, 2018, 161.
14. Stoeckius, M., et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nat. Methods 14 (2017), 865–868.
15. Peterson, V.M., et al. Multiplexed quantification of proteins and transcripts in single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 35 (2017), 936–939.
16. Aibar, S., et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat. Methods 14 (2017), 1083–1086.
17. Pliner, H.A., et al. Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Mol. Cell 71 (2018), 858–871.
18. Papili Gao, N., et al. SINCERITIES: inferring gene regulatory networks from time-stamped single cell transcriptional expression profiles. Bioinformatics 34 (2018), 258–266.
19. Argelaguet, R., et al. Multi-omics factor analysis – a framework for unsupervised integration of multi-omics data sets. Molecular Systems Biology, 14, 2018, e8124.
20. Angermueller, C., et al. DeepCpG: accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning. Genome Biol., 18, 2017, 67.
21. Datlinger, P., et al. Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat. Methods 14 (2017), 297–301.
22. Dixit, A., et al. Perturb-Seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167 (2016), 1853–1866.
23. Qiu, X., et al. Towards inferring causal gene regulatory networks from single cell expression measurements. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/426981 Published online September 25, 2018.
24. Tang, F., et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6 (2009), 377–382.
25. Tabula Muris Consortium, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562 (2018), 367–372.
26. Han, X., et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by microwell-seq. Cell, 173, 2018, 1307.
27. Cao, J., et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357 (2017), 661–667.
28. Cao, J., et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566 (2019), 496–502.
29. Stoeckius, M., et al. Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics. Genome Biol, 19, 2018, 224.
30. Rosenberg, A.B., et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360 (2018), 176–182.
31. Kang, H.M., et al. Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 36 (2018), 89–94.
32. van der Wijst, M.G.P., et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies cell type-specific cis-eQTLs and co-expression QTLs. Nat. Genet. 50 (2018), 493–497.
33. Kiselev, V.Y., et al. Scmap: projection of single-cell RNA-seq data across data sets. Nat. Methods 15 (2018), 359–362.
34. Wagner, F., Yanai, I., Moana: a robust and scalable cell type classification framework for single-cell RNA-Seq data. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/456129 Published online October 30, 2018.
35. Pliner, H.A., et al. Supervised classification enables rapid annotation of cell atlases. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/538652 Published online February 25, 2019.
36. Lotfollahi, M., et al. Generative modeling and latent space arithmetics predict single-cell perturbation response across cell types, studies and species. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/478503 Published online December 14, 2018.
37. Regev, A., et al. The human cell atlas. Elife, 6, 2017, e27041.
38. Bard, J., et al. An ontology for cell types. Genome Biol, 6, 2005, R21.
39. Meehan, T.F., et al. Logical development of the cell ontology. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 2011, 6.
40. Song, Y., et al. Single-cell alternative splicing analysis with Expedition reveals splicing dynamics during neuron differentiation. Mol. Cell 67 (2017), 148–161.
41. Gupta, I., et al. Single-cell isoform RNA sequencing characterizes isoforms in thousands of cerebellar cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 36 (2018), 1197–1202.
42. Ntranos, V. et al. Identification of transcriptional signatures for cell types from single-cell RNA-seq. bioRxiv Published online February 14, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/258566.
43. Miragaia, R.J., et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of regulatory T cells reveals trajectories of tissue adaptation. Immunity 50 (2019), 493–504.
44. Stubbington, M.J.T., et al. T cell fate and clonality inference from single-cell transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 13 (2016), 329–332.
45. Lindeman, I., et al. BraCeR: B-cell-receptor reconstruction and clonality inference from single-cell RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 15 (2018), 563–565.
46. Picelli, S., et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9 (2014), 171–181.
47. Azizi, E., et al. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment. Cell 174 (2018), 1293–1308.
48. Singh, M., et al. High-throughput targeted long-read single cell sequencing reveals the clonal and transcriptional landscape of lymphocytes. Nat. Commun., 10, 2019, 3120.
49. Glanville, J., et al. Identifying specificity groups in the T cell receptor repertoire. Nature 547 (2017), 94–98.
50. Dash, P., et al. Quantifiable predictive features define epitope-specific T cell receptor repertoires. Nature 547 (2017), 89–93.
51. Lönnberg, T., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq and computational analysis using temporal mixture modelling resolves Th1/Tfh fate bifurcation in malaria. Sci Immunol, 2, 2017, eaal2192.
52. Raj, B., et al. Simultaneous single-cell profiling of lineages and cell types in the vertebrate brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 36 (2018), 442–450.
53. Spanjaard, B., et al. Simultaneous lineage tracing and cell-type identification using CRISPR–Cas9-induced genetic scars. Nat. Biotechnol. 36 (2018), 469–473.
54. Vento-Tormo, R., et al. Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal-fetal interface in humans. Nature 563 (2018), 347–353.
55. Müller, S., et al. CONICS integrates scRNA-seq with DNA sequencing to map gene expression to tumor sub-clones. Bioinformatics 34 (2018), 3217–3219.
56. Campbell, K.R., et al. Clonealign: statistical integration of independent single-cell RNA & DNA-seq from human cancers. Genome Biol., 20, 2018, 54.
57. McCarthy, D.J., et al. Cardelino: integrating whole exomes and single-cell transcriptomes to reveal phenotypic impact of somatic variants. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/413047 Published online November 26, 2018.
58. Xu, J., et al. Single-cell lineage tracing by endogenous mutations enriched in transposase accessible mitochondrial DNA. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/480202 Published online November 29, 2018.
59. Ludwig, L.S., et al. Lineage tracing in humans enabled by mitochondrial mutations and single-cell genomics. Cell 176 (2019), 1325–1339.
60. Keren-Shaul, H., et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer's disease. Cell 169 (2017), 1276–1290.
61. Vieira Braga, F.A., et al. A cellular census of healthy lung and asthmatic airway wall identifies novel cell states in health and disease. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/527408 Published online January 23, 2019.
62. Rato, S., et al. Single-cell analysis identifies cellular markers of the HIV permissive cell. PLoS Pathog., 13, 2017, e1006678.
63. Golumbeanu, M., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals transcriptional heterogeneity in latent and reactivated HIV-infected cells. Cell Rep. 23 (2018), 942–950.
64. Zanini, F., et al. Virus-inclusive single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the molecular signature of progression to severe dengue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115 (2018), E12363–E12369.
65. Russell, A.B., et al. Extreme heterogeneity of influenza virus infection in single cells. Elife, 7, 2018, e32303.
66. Wyler, E., et al. Single-cell RNA-sequencing of herpes simplex virus 1-infected cells identifies NRF2 activation as an antiviral program. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/566992 Published online March 4, 2019.
67. Drayman, N., et al. HSV-1 single cell analysis reveals anti-viral and developmental programs activation in distinct sub-populations. Elife, 8, 2019, e46330.
68. Reid, A.J., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals hidden transcriptional variation in malaria parasites. Elife, 7, 2018, e33105.
69. Nötzel, C., et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of protozoan and metazoan parasites. Trends Parasitol 34 (2018), 731–734.
70. Macaulay, I.C., et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12 (2015), 519–522.
71. Macaulay, I.C., et al. Single-cell multiomics: multiple measurements from single cells. Trends Genet 33 (2017), 155–168.
72. Ackermann, M., A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13 (2015), 497–508.
73. Woyke, T., et al. The trajectory of microbial single-cell sequencing. Nat. Methods 14 (2017), 1045–1054.
74. Blecher-Gonen, R., et al. Single-cell analysis of diverse pathogen responses defines a molecular roadmap for generating antigen-specific immunity. Cell Syst. 8 (2019), 109–121.
75. Boisset, J.-C., et al. Mapping the physical network of cellular interactions. Nat. Methods 15 (2018), 547–553.
76. Chen, K.H., et al. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science, 348, 2015, aaa6090.
77. Ståhl, P.L., et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353 (2016), 78–82.
78. Vickovic, S., et al. High-density spatial transcriptomics arrays for in situ tissue profiling. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/563338 Published online March 13, 2019.
79. Rodriques, S.G., et al. Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 363 (2019), 1463–1467.
80. Lopez, R., et al. Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 15 (2018), 1053–1058.
81. Stuart, T., et al. Comprehensive integration of single cell data. Cell, 177, 2019 P188–1902.E21.
82. Welch, J., et al. Integrative inference of brain cell similarities and differences from single-cell genomics. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/459891 Published online November 2, 2018.
83. Moncada, R., et al. Integrating single-cell RNA-seq with spatial transcriptomics in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using multimodal intersection analysis. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/254375 Published online March 13, 2019.
84. Xu, C., et al. Harmonization and annotation of single-cell transcriptomics data with deep generative models. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/532895 Published online January 29, 2019.
85. Esteva, A., et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542 (2017), 115–118.
86. Ghahramani, A., et al. Generative adversarial networks simulate gene expression and predict perturbations in single cells. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/262501 Published online July 30, 2018.
87. LeCun, Y., et al. Deep learning. Nature 521 (2015), 436–444.
88. Grønbech, C.H., et al. scVAE: variational auto-encoders for single-cell gene expression data. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/318295 Published online May 21, 2019.
89. Chan, T.E., et al. Gene regulatory network inference from single-cell data using multivariate information measures. Cell Syst. 5 (2017), 251–267.
90. Meng, N., et al. Large-scale multi-class image-based cell classification with deep learning. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 23 (2018), 2091–2098.
91. Ozaki, Y., et al. Label-free classification of cells based on supervised machine learning of subcellular structures. PLoS One, 14, 2019, e0211347.
92. Cho, H., et al. Generalizable and scalable visualization of single-cell data using neural networks. Cell Syst. 7 (2018), 185–191.
93. Wang, L., et al. scCapsNet: a deep learning classifier with the capability of interpretable feature extraction, applicable for single cell RNA data analysis. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/506642 Published online May 21, 2019.
94. Svensson, V., Droplet scRNA-seq is not zero-inflated. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/582064 Published online March 19, 2019.
95. Hafemeister, C., Satija, R., Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. bioRxiv, 2019, 10.1101/576827 Published online March 18, 2019.
96. Noble, D., A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation. Interface Focus 2 (2012), 55–64.
97. Pijuan-Sala, B., et al. A single-cell molecular map of mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis. Nature 566 (2019), 490–495.
98. Zou, J., et al. A primer on deep learning in genomics. Nat. Genet. 51 (2019), 12–18.
99. Grabowski, P., Rappsilber, J., A primer on data analytics in functional genomics: how to move from data to insight?. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44 (2019), 21–32.
100. Doersch, C., Tutorial on variational autoencoders. arRxiv, 2016 Published online June 19, 2016 https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05908.