The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis

Nature

Volumn 566, Issue 7745, 2019, Pages 496-502

  Cao, Junyue ^a   Spielmann, Malte ^a   Qiu, Xiaojie ^a   Huang, Xingfan ^a,b   Ibrahim, Daniel M ^c,d   Hill, Andrew J ^a   Zhang, Fan ^e   Mundlos, Stefan ^c,d   Christiansen, Lena ^e   Steemers, Frank J ^e   Trapnell, Cole ^a,f,g   Shendure, Jay ^a,f,g,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^e ILLUMINA INC   (United States)

^f BROTMAN BATY INSTITUTE FOR PRECISION MEDICINE   (United States)

^g Allen Discovery Center for Cell Lineage Tracing   (United States)

^h HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; CELL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MAMMAL;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELLS BY BODY ANATOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; LIMB; MALE; MAMMAL; MARKER GENE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; ORGANOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; MAMMALIAN EMBRYO; MESODERM; METABOLISM; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TIME FACTOR;

MAMMALIA;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMALS; ECTODERM; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENETIC MARKERS; MALE; MESODERM; MICE; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; ORGANOGENESIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85062419120     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Kojima, Y., Tam, O. H. & Tam, P. P. L. Timing of developmental events in the early mouse embryo. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 65–75 (2014).
2. Tam, P. P. L. & Loebel, D. A. F. Gene function in mouse embryogenesis: get set for gastrulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 368–381 (2007).
3. Dickinson, M. E. et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature 537, 508–514 (2016).
4. Meehan, T. F. et al. Disease model discovery from 3,328 gene knockouts by The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Nat. Genet. 49, 1231–1238 (2017).
5. Wagner, D. E. et al. Single-cell mapping of gene expression landscapes and lineage in the zebrafish embryo. Science 360, 981–987 (2018).
6. Briggs, J. A. et al. The dynamics of gene expression in vertebrate embryogenesis at single-cell resolution. Science 360, eaar5780 (2018).
7. Farrell, J. A. et al. Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis. Science 360, eaar3131 (2018).
8. Mayer, C. et al. Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons. Nature 555, 457–462 (2018).
9. Lescroart, F. et al. Defining the earliest step of cardiovascular lineage segregation by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 359, 1177–1181 (2018).
10. Han, X. et al. Mapping the Mouse Cell Atlas by Microwell-seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107 (2018).
11. The Tabula Muris Consortium, Quake, S. R., Wyss-Coray, T. & Darmanis, S. Transcriptomic characterization of 20 organs and tissues from mouse at single cell resolution creates a Tabula Muris. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/237446v2 (2018).
12. Amini, S. et al. Haplotype-resolved whole-genome sequencing by contiguity-preserving transposition and combinatorial indexing. Nat. Genet. 46, 1343–1349 (2014).
13. Adey, A. et al. In vitro, long-range sequence information for de novo genome assembly via transposase contiguity. Genome Res. 24, 2041–2049 (2014).
14. Cusanovich, D. A. et al. Multiplex single cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 348, 910–914 (2015).
15. Vitak, S. A. et al. Sequencing thousands of single-cell genomes with combinatorial indexing. Nat. Methods 14, 302–308 (2017).
16. Ramani, V. et al. Massively multiplex single-cell Hi-C. Nat. Methods 14, 263–266 (2017).
17. Cao, J. et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661–667 (2017).
18. Mulqueen, R. M. et al. Highly scalable generation of DNA methylation profiles in single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 428–431 (2018).
19. Cao, J. et al. Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in thousands of single cells. Science 361, 1380–1385 (2018).
20. Rosenberg, A. B. et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360, 176–182 (2018).
21. La Manno, G. et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 560, 494–498 (2018).
22. Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R. & Klein, A. M. Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/357368v1 (2018).
23. Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell developmental trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017).
24. Yang, A. et al. p63 is essential for regenerative proliferation in limb, craniofacial and epithelial development. Nature 398, 714–718 (1999).
25. McQualter, J. L., Yuen, K., Williams, B. & Bertoncello, I. Evidence of an epithelial stem/progenitor cell hierarchy in the adult mouse lung. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1414–1419 (2010).
26. Cichorek, M., Wachulska, M., Stasiewicz, A. & Tymińska, A. Skin melanocytes: biology and development. Postepy Dermatol. Allergol. 30, 30–41 (2013).
27. Tomihari, M., Hwang, S.-H., Chung, J.-S., Cruz, P. D. Jr & Ariizumi, K. Gpnmb is a melanosome-associated glycoprotein that contributes to melanocyte/keratinocyte adhesion in a RGD-dependent fashion. Exp. Dermatol. 18, 586–595 (2009).
28. Varjosalo, M. & Taipale, J. Hedgehog: functions and mechanisms. Genes Dev. 22, 2454–2472 (2008).
29. Strähle, U., Lam, C. S., Ertzer, R. & Rastegar, S. Vertebrate floor-plate specification: variations on common themes. Trends Genet. 20, 155–162 (2004).
30. Holmes, G. P. et al. Distinct but overlapping expression patterns of two vertebrate slit homologs implies functional roles in CNS development and organogenesis. Mech. Dev. 79, 57–72 (1998).
31. Akle, V. et al. F-spondin/spon1b expression patterns in developing and adult zebrafish. PLoS ONE 7, e37593 (2012).
32. Zeisel, A. et al. Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell 174, 999–1014 (2018).
33. Hartman, B. H., Durruthy-Durruthy, R., Laske, R. D., Losorelli, S. & Heller, S. Identification and characterization of mouse otic sensory lineage genes. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 79 (2015).
34. Szenker-Ravi, E. et al. RSPO2 inhibition of RNF43 and ZNRF3 governs limb development independently of LGR4/5/6. Nature 557, 564–569 (2018).
35. Cai, X. et al. Tbx20 acts upstream of Wnt signaling to regulate endocardial cushion formation and valve remodeling during mouse cardiogenesis. Development 140, 3176–3187 (2013).
36. Miller, R. A., Christoforou, N., Pevsner, J., McCallion, A. S. & Gearhart, J. D. Efficient array-based identification of novel cardiac genes through differentiation of mouse ESCs. PLoS ONE 3, e2176 (2008).
37. Petit, F., Sears, K. E. & Ahituv, N. Limb development: a paradigm of gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 245–258 (2017).
38. Guo, Q., Loomis, C. & Joyner, A. L. Fate map of mouse ventral limb ectoderm and the apical ectodermal ridge. Dev. Biol. 264, 166–178 (2003).
39. Lewandoski, M., Sun, X. & Martin, G. R. Fgf8 signalling from the AER is essential for normal limb development. Nat. Genet. 26, 460–463 (2000).
40. Gerdes, J., Schwab, U., Lemke, H. & Stein, H. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation. Int. J. Cancer 31, 13–20 (1983).
41. Bergman, D., Halje, M., Nordin, M. & Engström, W. Insulin-like growth factor 2 in development and disease: a mini-review. Gerontology 59, 240–249 (2013).
42. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014).
43. McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426 (2018).
44. Alexander Wolf, F. et al. Graph abstraction reconciles clustering with trajectory inference through a topology preserving map of single cells. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/208819v2 (2018).
45. Braun, T. & Gautel, M. Transcriptional mechanisms regulating skeletal muscle differentiation, growth and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 349–361 (2011).
46. Comai, G., Sambasivan, R., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Tajbakhsh, S. Variations in the efficiency of lineage marking and ablation confound distinctions between myogenic cell populations. Dev. Cell 31, 654–667 (2014).
47. Halperin-Barlev, O. & Kalcheim, C. Sclerotome-derived Slit1 drives directional migration and differentiation of Robo2-expressing pioneer myoblasts. Development 138, 2935–2945 (2011).
48. Heimberg, G., Bhatnagar, R., El-Samad, H. & Thomson, M. Low dimensionality in gene expression data enables the accurate extraction of transcriptional programs from shallow sequencing. Cell Syst. 2, 239–250 (2016).
49. Osterwalder, M. et al. Enhancer redundancy provides phenotypic robustness in mammalian development. Nature 554, 239–243 (2018).
50. Dickel, D. E. et al. Ultraconserved enhancers are required for normal development. Cell 172, 491–499.e15 (2018).
51. Kraft, K. et al. Deletions, inversions, duplications: engineering of structural variants using CRISPR/Cas in mice. Cell Rep. 4, S2211–S1247 (2015).
52. Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
53. Renaud, G., Stenzel, U., Maricic, T., Wiebe, V. & Kelso, J. deML: robust demultiplexing of Illumina sequences using a likelihood-based approach. Bioinformatics 31, 770–772 (2015).
54. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
55. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2014).
56. Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).
57. Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).
58. Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R. & Klein, A. M. Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/357368v1 (2018).
59. Pliner, H. et al. Chromatin accessibility dynamics of myogenesis at single cell resolution. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/155473v1 (2017).
60. Kuleshov, M. V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90–W97 (2016).
61. Levine, J. H. et al. Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell 162, 184–197 (2015).
62. Mao, Q., Wang, L., Tsang, I. & Sun, Y. Principal graph and structure learning based on reversed graph embedding. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39, 2227–2241 (2016).
63. Mao, Q., Yang, L., Wang, L., Goodison, S. & Sun, Y. SimplePPT: a simple principal tree algorithm. In Proc. 2015 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (eds Venkatasubramanian, S. & Ye, J.) 792–800 (SIAM, 2015).
64. Moran, P. A. P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37, 17–23 (1950).
65. Li, D. et al. Formation of proximal and anterior limb skeleton requires early function of Irx3 and Irx5 and is negatively regulated by Shh signaling. Dev. Cell 29, 233–240 (2014).