Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure

Nature

Volumn 502, Issue 7469, 2013, Pages 59-64

  Nagano, Takashi ^a   Lubling, Yaniv ^b   Stevens, Tim J ^c   Schoenfelder, Stefan ^a   Yaffe, Eitan ^b   Dean, Wendy ^a   Laue, Ernest D ^c   Tanay, Amos ^b   Fraser, Peter ^a  

^a BABRAHAM INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ORGANELLE; CHROMOSOME; DNA; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; GENE LIBRARY; GENE LOCATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; MICROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; X CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; MALE; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; X CHROMOSOME;

EID: 84885617426     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12593     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306-1311 (2002).
2. Dostie, J. et al.Chromosome ConformationCaptureCarbonCopy (5C): amassively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299-1309 (2006).
3. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
4. Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nature Genet. 42, 53-61 (2010).
5. Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nature Genet. 38, 1348-1354 (2006).
6. Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra-and interchromosomal interactions. Nature Genet. 38, 1341-1347 (2006).
7. Duan, Z. et al. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 465, 363-367 (2010).
8. Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F. & Chen, L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 90-98 (2012).
9. Marti-Renom, M. A. & Mirny, L. A. Bridging the resolution gap in structural modeling of 3D genome organization. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002125 (2011).
10. Tanizawa, H. et al.Mapping of long-range associations throughout the fission yeast genome reveals global genome organization linked to transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 8164-8177 (2010).
11. van deWerken, H. J. et al.Robust4C-seq data analysis to screen for regulatoryDNA interactions. Nature Methods 9, 969-972 (2012).
12. Osborne, C. S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nature Genet. 36, 1065-1071 (2004).
13. Rapkin, L. M., Anchel, D. R., Li, R. & Bazett-Jones, D. P. A view of the chromatin landscape. Micron 43, 150-158 (2012).
14. Fraser, P.&Bickmore, W.Nuclear organization of the genomeand the potential for gene regulation. Nature 447, 413-417 (2007).
15. Lancto t, C., Cheutin, T., Cremer, M., Cavalli, G. & Cremer, T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 104-115 (2007).
16. Osborne, C. S. et al. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol. 5, e192 (2007).
17. Yaffe, E. & Tanay, A. Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture. Nature Genet. 43, 1059-1065 (2011).
18. Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458-472 (2012).
19. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
20. Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-385 (2012).
21. Gibcus, J. H. & Dekker, J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol. Cell 49, 773-782 (2013).
22. Jhunjhunwala, S. et al. The3Dstructure of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus: implications for long-range genomic interactions. Cell 133, 265-279 (2008).
23. Müller, I., Boyle, S., Singer, R. H., Bickmore, W. A. & Chubb, J. R. Stablemorphology, but dynamic internal reorganisation, of interphase human chromosomes in living cells. PLoS ONE 5, e11560 (2010).
24. Heard, E. & Bickmore, W. The ins and outs of gene regulation and chromosome territory organisation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 311-316 (2007).
25. Deaton, A. M. et al. Cell type-specific DNA methylation at intragenic CpG islands in the immune system. Genome Res. 21, 1074-1086 (2011).
26. Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603-613 (2010).
27. Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 292-301 (2001).
28. Misteli, T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128, 787-800 (2007).
29. Branco, M. R. & Pombo, A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol. 4, e138 (2006).
30. Chuang, C. H. et al. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr. Biol. 16, 825-831 (2006).
31. Chubb, J. R., Boyle, S., Perry, P.& Bickmore, W. A. Chromatinmotion is constrained by association with nuclear compartments in human cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 439-445 (2002).
32. Dundr, M. et al. Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 179, 1095-1103 (2007).