Single-Cell Multiomics: Multiple Measurements from Single Cells

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 155-168

  Macaulay, Iain C ^a   Ponting, Chris P ^b,c   Voet, Thierry ^b,d  

^a NORWICH RESEARCH PARK   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

epigenomics; genomics; multiomics; proteomics; single cell; transcriptomics

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME; PROTEOME;

ASSAY; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVIEW; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL MULTIOMICS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; DNA METHYLATION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METABOLOME; PROCEDURES;

DNA METHYLATION; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; METABOLOME; PROTEOME; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85009781625     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. 1 Yates, L.R., Campbell, P.J., Evolution of the cancer genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13 (2012), 795–806.
2. 2 Poduri, A., et al. Somatic mutation, genomic variation, and neurological disease. Science, 341, 2013, 1237758.
3. 3 Biesecker, L.G., Spinner, N.B., A genomic view of mosaicism and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14 (2013), 307–320.
4. 4 Gawad, C., et al. Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17 (2016), 175–188.
5. 5 Schwartzman, O., Tanay, A., Single-cell epigenomics: techniques and emerging applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16 (2015), 716–726.
6. 6 Stegle, O., et al. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16 (2015), 133–145.
7. 7 Wu, M., Singh, A.K., Single-cell protein analysis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23 (2012), 83–88.
8. 8 Patel, A.P., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344 (2014), 1396–1401.
9. 9 Tirosh, I., et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352 (2016), 189–196.
10. 10 Dey, S.S., et al. Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing of the same cell. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 285–289.
11. 11 Zong, C., et al. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell. Science 338 (2012), 1622–1626.
12. 12 Hashimshony, T., et al. CEL-seq: single-cell RNA-seq by multiplexed linear amplification. Cell Rep. 2 (2012), 666–673.
13. 13 Macaulay, I.C., et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12 (2015), 519–522.
14. 14 Macaulay, I.C., et al. Separation and parallel sequencing of the genomes and transcriptomes of single cells using G&T-seq. Nat. Protoc. 11 (2016), 2081–2103.
15. 15 Picelli, S., et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10 (2013), 1096–1098.
16. 16 Picelli, S., et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9 (2014), 171–181.
17. 17 Li, W., et al. Single-cell transcriptogenomics reveals transcriptional exclusion of ENU-mutated alleles. Mutat. Res. 772 (2015), 55–62.
18. 18 Han, L., et al. Co-detection and sequencing of genes and transcripts from the same single cells facilitated by a microfluidics platform. Sci. Rep., 4, 2014, 6485.
19. 19 Hou, Y., et al. Single-cell triple omics sequencing reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cell. Res. 26 (2016), 304–319.
20. 20 Hu, Y., et al. Simultaneous profiling of transcriptome and DNA methylome from a single cell. Genome Biol., 17, 2016, 88.
21. 21 Macaulay, I.C., Voet, T., Single cell genomics: advances and future perspectives. PLoS Genet., 10, 2014, e1004126.
22. 22 Islam, S., et al. Highly multiplexed and strand-specific single-cell RNA 5′ end sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 7 (2012), 813–828.
23. 23 Islam, S., et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 11 (2014), 163–166.
24. 24 Shapiro, E., et al. Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14 (2013), 618–630.
25. 25 Evrony, G.D., et al. Resolving rates of mutation in the brain using single-neuron genomics. Elife, 5, 2016, e12966.
26. 26 Hu, W.F., et al. The diverse genetic landscape of neurodevelopmental disorders. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 15 (2014), 195–213.
27. 27 Jones, P.A., Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13 (2012), 484–492.
28. 28 Smallwood, S.A., et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 11 (2014), 817–820.
29. 29 Guo, H., et al. Single-cell methylome landscapes of mouse embryonic stem cells and early embryos analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Genome Res. 23 (2013), 2126–2135.
30. 30 Angermueller, C., et al. Parallel single-cell sequencing links transcriptional and epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 13 (2016), 229–232.
31. 31 Tang, F., et al. RNA-Seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell. Nat. Protoc. 5 (2010), 516–535.
32. 32 Tang, F., et al. mRNA-seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6 (2009), 377–382.
33. 33 Cheow, L.F., et al. Multiplexed locus-specific analysis of DNA methylation in single cells. Nat. Protoc. 10 (2015), 619–631.
34. 34 Lorthongpanich, C., et al. Single-cell DNA-methylation analysis reveals epigenetic chimerism in preimplantation embryos. Science 341 (2013), 1110–1112.
35. 35 Cheow, L.F., et al. Single-cell multimodal profiling reveals cellular epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 13 (2016), 833–836.
36. 36 Clark, S.J., et al. Single-cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity. Genome Biol., 17, 2016, 72.
37. 37 Mooijman, D., et al. Single-cell 5hmC sequencing reveals chromosome-wide cell-to-cell variability and enables lineage reconstruction. Nat. Biotechnol. 34 (2016), 852–856.
38. 38 Buenrostro, J.D., et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature 523 (2015), 486–490.
39. 39 Jin, W., et al. Genome-wide detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites in single cells and FFPE tissue samples. Nature 528 (2015), 142–146.
40. 40 Nagano, T., et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502 (2013), 59–64.
41. 41 Rotem, A., et al. Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 1165–1172.
42. 42 Kind, J., et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153 (2013), 178–192.
43. 43 Hughes, A.J., et al. Single-cell western blotting. Nat. Methods 11 (2014), 749–755.
44. 44 Fredriksson, S., et al. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat. Biotechnol. 20 (2002), 473–477.
45. 45 Assarsson, E., et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e95192.
46. 46 Bendall, S.C., et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332 (2011), 687–696.
47. 47 Spitzer, M.H., Nolan, G.P., Mass cytometry: single cells, many features. Cell 165 (2016), 780–791.
48. 48 Virant-Klun, I., et al. Identification of maturation-specific proteins by single-cell proteomics of human oocytes. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15 (2016), 2616–2627.
49. 49 Nestorowa, S., et al. A single-cell resolution map of mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation. Blood 128 (2016), e20–e31.
50. 50 Soh, K.T., et al. Simultaneous, single-cell measurement of messenger RNA, cell surface proteins, and intracellular proteins. Curr. Protoc. Cytom., 75, 2016 7.45.1-7.45.33.
51. 51 Kochan, J., et al. Simultaneous detection of mRNA and protein in single cells using immunofluorescence-combined single-molecule RNA FISH. Biotechniques 59 (2015), 209–212 214, 216 passim.
52. 52 Darmanis, S., et al. ProteinSeq: high-performance proteomic analyses by proximity ligation and next generation sequencing. PLoS One, 6, 2011, e25583.
53. 53 Darmanis, S., et al. Simultaneous multiplexed measurement of RNA and proteins in single cells. Cell Rep. 14 (2016), 380–389.
54. 54 Genshaft, A.S., et al. Multiplexed, targeted profiling of single-cell proteomes and transcriptomes in a single reaction. Genome Biol., 17, 2016, 188.
55. 55 Stahlberg, A., et al. Quantitative PCR analysis of DNA, RNAs, and proteins in the same single cell. Clin. Chem. 58 (2012), 1682–1691.
56. 56 Albayrak, C., et al. Digital quantification of proteins and mRNA in single mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 61 (2016), 914–924.
57. 57 Frei, A.P., et al. Highly multiplexed simultaneous detection of RNAs and proteins in single cells. Nat. Methods 13 (2016), 269–275.
58. 58 Hughes, C.S., et al. Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology. Mol. Syst. Biol., 10, 2014, 757.
59. 59 Dang, Y., et al. Tracing the expression of circular RNAs in human pre-implantation embryos. Genome Biol., 17, 2016, 130.
60. 60 Faridani, O.R., et al. Single-cell sequencing of the small-RNA transcriptome. Nat. Biotechnol. 34 (2016), 1264–1266.
61. 61 Zenobi, R., Single-cell metabolomics: analytical and biological perspectives. Science, 342, 2013, 1243259.
62. 62 Laszlo, A.H., et al. Detection and mapping of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine with nanopore MspA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 18904–18909.
63. 63 Schreiber, J., et al. Error rates for nanopore discrimination among cytosine, methylcytosine, and hydroxymethylcytosine along individual DNA strands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 18910–18915.
64. 64 Vilfan, I.D., et al. Analysis of RNA base modification and structural rearrangement by single-molecule real-time detection of reverse transcription. J. Nanobiotechnol., 11, 2013, 8.
65. 65 Garalde, D.R., et al. Highly parallel direct RNA sequencing on an array of nanopores. bioRxiv, 2016 Published online August 12, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1101/068809.
66. 66 Rosen, C.B., et al. Single-molecule site-specific detection of protein phosphorylation with a nanopore. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 179–181.
67. 67 Feng, Y., et al. Nanopore-based fourth-generation DNA sequencing technology. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 13 (2015), 4–16.
68. 68 Baslan, T., et al. Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells. Nat. Protoc. 7 (2012), 1024–1041.
69. 69 Habib, N., et al. Div-seq: single-nucleus RNA-Seq reveals dynamics of rare adult newborn neurons. Science 353 (2016), 925–928.
70. 70 Voet, T., et al. Single-cell paired-end genome sequencing reveals structural variation per cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (2013), 6119–6138.
71. 71 Osborne, G.W., Recent advances in flow cytometric cell sorting. Methods Cell. Biol. 102 (2011), 533–556.
72. 72 Pollen, A.A., et al. Low-coverage single-cell mRNA sequencing reveals cellular heterogeneity and activated signaling pathways in developing cerebral cortex. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 1053–1058.
73. 73 Macosko, E.Z., et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161 (2015), 1202–1214.
74. 74 Zilionis, R., et al. Single-cell barcoding and sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Nat. Protoc. 12 (2017), 44–73.
75. 75 Klein, A.M., et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161 (2015), 1187–1201.
76. 76 Boone, D.R., et al. Laser capture microdissection of enriched populations of neurons or single neurons for gene expression analysis after traumatic brain injury. J. Vis. Exp., 2013, e50308.