Erratum: DeepCpG: Accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning [Genome Biol. 18, (2017)(67)] DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1189-z;DeepCpG: Accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning

Genome Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Angermueller, Christof ^a   Lee, Heather J ^b,c   Reik, Wolf ^b,c   Stegle, Oliver ^a  

^a EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b BABRAHAM INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Deep learning; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Machine learning; Single cell genomics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPG ISLAND; DNA METHYLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MACHINE LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PREDICTION;

EID: 85018466550     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1233-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (72)

1. Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:597-610.
2. Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:465-76.
3. Laird PW. Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:191-203.
4. Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:484-92.
5. Smallwood SA, Lee HJ, Angermueller C, Krueger F, Saadeh H, Peat J, et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat Methods. 2014;11:817-20.
6. Farlik M, Sheffield NC, Nuzzo A, Datlinger P, Schönegger A, Klughammer J, et al. Single-cell DNA methylome sequencing and bioinformatic inference of epigenomic cell-state dynamics. Cell Rep. 2015;10:1386-97.
7. Guo H, Zhu P, Wu X, Li X, Wen L, Tang F. Single-cell methylome landscapes of mouse embryonic stem cells and early embryos analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Genome Res. 2013;23:2126-35.
8. Hou Y, Guo H, Cao C, Li X, Hu B, Zhu P, et al. Single-cell triple omics sequencing reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cell Res. 2016;26:304-19.
9. Peat JR, Dean W, Clark SJ, Krueger F, Smallwood SA, Ficz G, et al. Genome-wide bisulfite sequencing in zygotes identifies demethylation targets and maps the contribution of TET3 oxidation. Cell Rep. 2014;9:1990-2000.
10. Angermueller C, Clark SJ, Lee HJ, Macaulay IC, Teng MJ, Hu TX, et al. Parallel single-cell sequencing links transcriptional and epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat Methods. 2016;13:229-32.
11. Hu Y, Huang K, An Q, Du G, Hu G, Xue J, et al. Simultaneous profiling of transcriptome and DNA methylome from a single cell. Genome Biol. 2016;16:14.
12. Zhang W, Spector TD, Deloukas P, Bell JT, Engelhardt BE. Predicting genome-wide DNA methylation using methylation marks, genomic position, and DNA regulatory elements. Genome Biol. 2015;16:14.
13. Stevens M, Cheng JB, Li D, Xie M, Hong C, Maire CL, et al. Estimating absolute methylation levels at single-CpG resolution from methylation enrichment and restriction enzyme sequencing methods. Genome Res. 2013;23:1541-53.
14. Ernst J, Kellis M. Large-scale imputation of epigenomic datasets for systematic annotation of diverse human tissues. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:364-76.
15. Liu Z, Xiao X, Qiu W-R, Chou K-C. iDNA-Methyl: Identifying DNA methylation sites via pseudo trinucleotide composition. Anal Biochem. 2015;474:69-77.
16. Whitaker JW, Chen Z, Wang W. Predicting the human epigenome from DNA motifs. Nat Methods. 2015;12:265-72.
17. LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker JS, Henderson D, Howard RE, Hubbard W, et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput. 1989;1:541-51.
18. Bengio Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and trends® in Machine Learning. 2009;2(1):1-27.
19. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436-44.
20. Bhasin M, Zhang H, Reinherz EL, Reche PA. Prediction of methylated CpGs in DNA sequences using a support vector machine. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:4302-8.
21. Lu L. Predicting DNA, methylation status using word composition. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2010;3:672-6.
22. Zhou X, Li Z, Dai Z, Zou X. Prediction of methylation CpGs and their methylation degrees in human DNA sequences. Comput Biol Med. 2012;42:408-13.
23. Li Z, Chen L, Lai Y, Dai Z, Zou X. The prediction of methylation states in human DNA sequences based on hexanucleotide composition and feature selection. Anal Methods. 2014;6:1897.
24. Jarrett K, Kavukcuoglu K, Ranzato M, LeCun Y. What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition? 2009 IEEE 12th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2009. p. 2146-53
25. Zhang X, Zhao J, LeCun Y. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. arXiv. 2015.
26. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv. 2015.
27. Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V. Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. arXiv. 2016.
28. Denas O, Taylor J. Deep modeling of gene expression regulation in an erythropoiesis model. Represent. Learn. ICML Workshop. 2013
29. Alipanahi B, Delong A, Weirauch MT, Frey BJ. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:831-8.
30. Zhou J, Troyanskaya OG. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nat Methods. 2015;12:931-4.
31. Xiong HY, Alipanahi B, Lee LJ, Bretschneider H, Merico D, Yuen RKC, et al. The human splicing code reveals new insights into the genetic determinants of disease. Science. 2015;347:1254806.
32. Kelley DR, Snoek J, Rinn J. "Basset: Learning the Regulatory Code of the Accessible Genome with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks". Genom Res. doi: 10.1101/gr.200535.115.
33. Angermueller C, Pärnamaa T, Parts L, Stegle O. Deep learning for computational biology. Mol Syst Biol. 2016;12:878.
34. Stormo GD, Schneider TD, Gold L, Ehrenfeucht A. Use of the "Perceptron" algorithm to distinguish translational initiation sites in E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982;10:2997-3011.
35. Sinha S. On counting position weight matrix matches in a sequence, with application to discriminative motif finding. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:e454-63.
36. Chung J, Gulcehre C, Cho K, Bengio Y. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv. 2014.
37. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5-32.
38. Powers DM. Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. J Mach Learn Technol. 2011;2:37-63.
39. Matthews BW. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975;405:442-51.
40. Thomson JP, Skene PJ, Selfridge J, Clouaire T, Guy J, Webb S, et al. CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1. Nature. 2010;464:1082-6.
41. Mendenhall EM, Koche RP, Truong T, Zhou VW, Issac B, Chi AS, et al. GC-rich sequence elements recruit PRC2 in mammalian ES cells. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001244.
42. Weirauch MT, Yang A, Albu M, Cote AG, Montenegro-Montero A, Drewe P, et al. Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell. 2014;158:1431-43.
43. Newburger DE, Bulyk ML. UniPROBE: an online database of protein binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D77-82.
44. Hervouet E, Vallette FM, Cartron P-F. Dnmt3/transcription factor interactions as crucial players in targeted DNA methylation. Epigenetics. 2009;4:487-99.
45. Luu P-L, Scholer HR, Arauzo-Bravo MJ. Disclosing the crosstalk among DNA methylation, transcription factors, and histone marks in human pluripotent cells through discovery of DNA methylation motifs. Genome Res. 2013;23:2013-29.
46. Kim TH, Abdullaev ZK, Smith AD, Ching KA, Loukinov DI, Green RD, et al. Analysis of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF-binding sites in the human genome. Cell. 2007;128:1231-45.
47. Tsai S-Y, Opavsky R, Sharma N, Wu L, Naidu S, Nolan E, et al. Mouse development with a single E2F activator. Nature. 2008;454:1137-41.
48. Fernandez-Zapico ME, Lomberk GA, Tsuji S, DeMars CJ, Bardsley MR, Lin Y-H, et al. A functional family-wide screening of SP/KLF proteins identifies a subset of suppressors of KRAS -mediated cell growth. Biochem J. 2011;435:529-37.
49. Lee CS, Sund NJ, Behr R, Herrera PL, Kaestner KH. Foxa2 is required for the differentiation of pancreatic α-cells. Dev Biol. 2005;278:484-95.
50. Wan H, Dingle S, Xu Y, Besnard V, Kaestner KH, Ang S-L, et al. Compensatory roles of Foxa1 and Foxa2 during lung morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:13809-16.
51. Marais R, Wynne J, Treisman R. The SRF accessory protein Elk-1 contains a growth factor-regulated transcriptional activation domain. Cell. 1993;73:381-93.
52. Arsenian S, Weinhold B, Oelgeschläger M, Rüther U, Nordheim A. Serum response factor is essential for mesoderm formation during mouse embryogenesis. EMBO J. 1998;17:6289-99.
53. Quenneville S, Verde G, Corsinotti A, Kapopoulou A, Jakobsson J, Offner S, et al. In embryonic stem cells, ZFP57/KAP1 recognize a methylated hexanucleotide to affect chromatin and DNA methylation of imprinting control regions. Mol Cell. 2011;44:361-72.
54. Huang G, Yuan M, Zhang J, Li J, Gong D, Li Y, et al. IL-6 mediates differentiation disorder during spermatogenesis in obesity-associated inflammation by affecting the expression of Zfp637 through the SOCS3/STAT3 pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28012.
55. Simonyan K, Vedaldi A, Zisserman A. Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. arXiv. 2013.
56. Kaplow IM, MacIsaac JL, Mah SM, McEwen LM, Kobor MS, Fraser HB. A pooling-based approach to mapping genetic variants associated with DNA methylation. Genome Res. 2015;25:907-17.
57. Sumoy L, Carim L, Escarceller M, Nadal M, Gratacòs M, Pujana MA, et al. HMG20A and HMG20B map to human chromosomes 15q24 and 19p13.3 and constitute a distinct class of HMG-box genes with ubiquitous expression. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2000;88:62-7.
58. Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv. 2014.
59. Wu Y, Schuster M, Chen Z, Le QV, Norouzi M, Macherey W, et al. Google's neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv. 2016.
60. Graves A, Mohamed A-R, Hinton G. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. 2013 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ICASSP. 2013. p. 6645-9
61. Lee B, Lee T, Na B, Yoon S. DNA-level splice junction prediction using deep recurrent neural networks. arXiv. 2015.
62. Quang D, Xie X. DanQ: a hybrid convolutional and recurrent deep neural network for quantifying the function of DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:e107.
63. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15:1929-58.
64. Glorot X, Bengio Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Int Conf Artif Intell Stat. 2016
65. Kingma D, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv. 2014.
66. Bergstra J, Bengio Y. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J Mach Learn Res. 2012;13:281-305.
67. Bastien F, Lamblin P, Pascanu R, Bergstra J, Goodfellow I, Bergeron A, et al. Theano: new features and speed improvements. arXiv. 2012.
68. Chollet F. Keras: Theano-based deep learning library. https://github.com/fchollet/keras. Accessed 26 Mar 2017.
69. Crooks GE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14:1188-90.
70. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W202-8.
71. Siepel A. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 2005;15:1034-50.
72. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74:829-36.