Evidence supporting oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates independent of sweet taste sensitivity in humans

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2017, Pages

  Low, Julia Y Q ^a   Lacy, Kathleen E ^b   McBride, Robert L ^a   Keast, Russell S J ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; ERYTHRITOL; FRUCTOSE; FRUCTOSE OLIGOSACCHARIDE; GLUCOSE; MALTODEXTRIN; NONNUTRITIVE SWEETENER; SUCRALOSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BITTER TASTE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SALTINESS; SOUR TASTE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SWEETNESS; TASTE ACUITY; TASTE DISCRIMINATION; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; UMAMI; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; REPRODUCIBILITY; TASTE;

ADULT; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TASTE PERCEPTION;

EID: 85039707491     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188784     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Sclafani A. Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity: An overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1987; 11(2):131–53.
2. Sclafani A. Starch and sugar tastes in rodents: an update. Brain research bulletin. 1991; 27(3):383–6.
3. Sclafani A. The sixth taste? Appetite. 2004; 43(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.03.007PMID: 15262010
4. Lapis TJ, Penner MH, Lim J. Evidence that humans can taste glucose polymers. Chemical senses. 2014; 39(9):737–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bju031 PMID: 25326592
5. Lapis TJ, Penner MH, Lim J. Humans can taste glucose oligomers independent of the hT1R2/hT1R3 sweet taste receptor. Chemical senses. 2016; 41(9):755–62.
6. Spector AC, Schier LA. Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms. Appetite. 2016.
7. Ackroff K, Sclafani A. Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsen-sitive (129P3/J) mice revisited. Physiology & behavior. 2016; 165:286–90.
8. de Ataide e Silva T, Di Cavalcanti Alves de Souza ME, de Amorim JF, Stathis CG, Leandro CG, Lima-Silva AE. Can carbohydrate mouth rinse improve performance during exercise? A systematic review. Nutrients. 2013; 6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6010001 PMID: 24451304
9. Jiang P, Cui M, Zhao B, Liu Z, Snyder LA, Benard LM, et al. Lactisole interacts with the transmembrane domains of human T1R3 to inhibit sweet taste. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005; 280(15):15238–46. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414287200 PMID: 15668251
10. Webb J, Bolhuis DP, Cicerale S, Hayes JE, Keast R. The relationships between common measurements of taste function. Chemosensory perception. 2015; 8(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-015-9183-x PMID: 26110045
11. Keast RS, Roper J. A complex relationship among chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity of bitter compounds. Chemical senses. 2007; 32(3):245–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl052 PMID: 17220518
12. Low JY, McBride RL, Lacy KE, Keast RS. Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners. Chemical Senses. 2016:bjw109.
13. Green BG, Shaffer GS, Gilmore MM. Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chemical senses. 1993; 18(6):683–702.
14. Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J. Evaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chemical senses. 1996; 21(3):323–34. PMID: 8670711
15. Bartoshuk LM. Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chemical senses. 2000; 25(4):447–60. PMID: 10944509
16. Dokic P, Jakovljevic J, Dokic-Baucal L. Molecular characteristics of maltodextrins and rheological behaviour of diluted and concentrated solutions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 1998; 141(3):435–40.
17. ISO3972. International Organisation for Standardization. Sensory analysis-Methodology-Method of Investigating Sensitivity of Taste. 1991.
18. Keast RS, Canty TM, Breslin PA. Oral zinc sulfate solutions inhibit sweet taste perception. Chemical senses. 2004; 29(6):513–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh053 PMID: 15269123
19. Verhoef SP, Meyer D, Westerterp KR. Effects of oligofructose on appetite profile, glucagon-like peptide 1 and peptide YY3-36 concentrations and energy intake. British journal of nutrition. 2011; 106 (11):1757–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511002194 PMID: 21679485
20. Verhoef S, Meyer D, Westerterp K. Effects of oligofructose on appetite profile, GLP-1 and PYY concentrations and energy intake. Body weight loss and maintenance as affected by environment and genetic predisposition. 2013: 17.
21. Liber A, Szajewska H. Effect of oligofructose supplementation on body weight in overweight and obese children: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition. 2014; 112 (12):2068–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514003110 PMID: 25327394
22. Dehghan P, Gargari BP, Jafar-Abadi MA. Oligofructose-enriched inulin improves some inflammatory markers and metabolic endotoxemia in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Nutrition. 2014; 30(4):418–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2013.09.005 PMID: 24332524
23. Meilgaard MC, Carr BT, Civille GV. Sensory evaluation techniques: CRC press; 2006.
24. Stewart JE, Feinle-Bisset C, Golding M, Delahunty C, Clifton PM, Keast RS. Oral sensitivity to fatty acids, food consumption and BMI in human subjects. British Journal of Nutrition. 2010; 104(01):145–52.
25. Delwiche JF, Buletic Z, Breslin PA. Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals. Physiology & Behavior. 2001; 74(3):329–37.
26. Stewart JE, Feinle-Bisset C, Keast RS. Fatty acid detection during food consumption and digestion: associations with ingestive behavior and obesity. Progress in lipid research. 2011; 50(3):225–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2011.02.002 PMID: 21356242
27. Stewart J, Keast R. Recent fat intake modulates fat taste sensitivity in lean and overweight subjects. International journal of obesity. 2012; 36(6):834. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.155 PMID: 21829156
28. Newman L, Haryono R, Keast R. Functionality of fatty acid chemoreception: a potential factor in the development of obesity? Nutrients. 2013; 5(4):1287–300. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5041287 PMID: 23595136
29. Newman LP, Keast RS. The test–retest reliability of fatty acid taste thresholds. Chemosensory perception. 2013; 6(2):70–7.
30. Newman LP, Bolhuis DP, Torres SJ, Keast RS. Dietary fat restriction increases fat taste sensitivity in people with obesity. Obesity. 2016; 24(2):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21357 PMID: 26813525
31. Mattes RD. Accumulating evidence supports a taste component for free fatty acids in humans. Physiology & behavior. 2011; 104(4):624–31.
32. Running CA, Craig BA, Mattes RD. Oleogustus: the unique taste of fat. Chemical senses. 2015; 40 (7):507–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjv036 PMID: 26142421
33. Tucker RM, Edlinger C, Craig BA, Mattes RD. Associations between BMI and fat taste sensitivity in humans. Chemical senses. 2014; 39(4):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bju006 PMID: 24591531
34. Mattes RD. Oral fat exposure pattern and lipid loading effects on the serum triacylglycerol concentration of humans. Chemosensory perception. 2009; 2(4):180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-009-9062-4PMID: 20352072
35. Chalé-Rush A, Burgess JR, Mattes RD. Evidence for human orosensory (taste?) sensitivity to free fatty acids. Chemical senses. 2007; 32(5):423–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjm007 PMID: 17361006
36. Keast RS. Effects of sugar and fat consumption on sweet and fat taste. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2016.
37. Kurihara K, Kashiwayanagi M. Introductory remarks on umami taste. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1998; 855(1):393–7.
38. Keast RS, Costanzo A. Is fat the sixth taste primary? Evidence and implications. Flavour. 2015; 4(1):5.
39. Feigin MB, Sclafani A, Sunday SR. Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1987; 11(2):231–40.
40. Hettinger TP, Frank ME, Myers WE. Are the tastes of polycose and monosodium glutamate unique? Chemical senses. 1996; 21(3):341–7. PMID: 8670713
41. de Araujo IE, Lin T, Veldhuizen MG, Small DM. Metabolic regulation of brain response to food cues. Current Biology. 2013; 23(10):878–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.001 PMID: 23643837
42. Yeomans MR. Flavour–nutrient learning in humans: An elusive phenomenon? Physiology & behavior. 2012; 106(3):345–55.
43. Zhang Y, Hoon MA, Chandrashekar J, Mueller KL, Cook B, Wu D, et al. Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell. 2003; 112(3):293–301. PMID: 12581520
44. Liman ER, Zhang YV, Montell C. Peripheral coding of taste. Neuron. 2014; 81(5):984–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.022 PMID: 24607224
45. Cui M, Jiang P, Maillet E, Max M, Margolskee RF, Osman R. The heterodimeric sweet taste receptor has multiple potential ligand binding sites. Current pharmaceutical design. 2006; 12(35):4591–600. PMID: 17168764
46. Nissenbaum JW, Sclafani A. Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: A two-carbohydrate taste model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1987; 11(2):187–96.
47. Giza BK, Scott TR, Sclafani A, Antonucci RF. Polysaccharides as taste stimuli: their effect in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat. Brain research. 1991; 555(1):1–9. PMID: 1933322
48. Treesukosol Y, Blonde GD, Spector AC. T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2009; 296(4):R855–R65. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.90869.2008 PMID: 19158407
49. Zukerman S, Glendinning JI, Margolskee RF, Sclafani A. T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2009; 296(4):R866–R76. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.90870.2008 PMID: 19091911
50. Treesukosol Y, Smith KR, Spector AC. Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+ 3 heterodimer in a mouse model. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011; 31 (38):13527–34. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2179-11.2011 PMID: 21940444
51. Treesukosol Y, Spector AC. Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2012; 303(2):R218–R35. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00089.2012 PMID: 22621968
52. Sako N, Shimura T, Komure M, Mochizuki R, Matsuo R, Yamamoto T. Differences in taste responses to Polycose and common sugars in the rat as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Physiology & behavior. 1994; 56(4):741–5.
53. Davis JD, Breslin PA. A behavioral analysis of the ingestion of glucose, maltose and maltooligosaccharide by rats. Physiology & behavior. 2000; 69(4):477–85.
54. Glendinning JI, Chyou S, Lin I, Onishi M, Patel P, Zheng KH. Initial licking responses of mice to sweeteners: effects of tas1r3 polymorphisms. Chemical senses. 2005; 30(7):601–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bji054 PMID: 16135742
55. Mandel AL, Breslin PA. High endogenous salivary amylase activity is associated with improved glyce-mic homeostasis following starch ingestion in adults. The Journal of nutrition. 2012; 142(5):853–8. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.156984 PMID: 22492122
56. Breslin P, Beauchamp G, Pugh E. Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose. Perception & Psychophysics. 1996; 58(3):327–41.
57. Niness KR. Inulin and oligofructose: what are they? The Journal of nutrition. 1999; 129(7):1402S–6s.
58. Handa C, Goomer S, Siddhu A. Physicochemical properties and sensory evaluation of fructoligosac-charide enriched cookies. Journal of food science and technology. 2012; 49(2):192–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0277-4 PMID: 23572841
59. Cicerale S, Riddell LJ, Keast RS. The association between perceived sweetness intensity and dietary intake in young adults. Journal of food science. 2012; 77(1):H31–H5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17503841.2011.02473.x PMID: 22132685
60. Yoshiko K, Roswith R. Relationship between taste sensitivity and eating style in Japanese female university students. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2012; 2012.
61. Lim J, Urban L, Green BG. Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception. Chemical senses. 2008; 33(6):493–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn016 PMID: 18453638
62. Mandel AL, des Gachons CP, Plank KL, Alarcon S, Breslin PA. Individual differences in AMY1 gene copy number, salivary α-amylase levels, and the perception of oral starch. PloS one. 2010; 5(10): e13352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013352 PMID: 20967220
63. Beauchamp GK. Why do we like sweet taste: a bitter tale? Physiology & behavior. 2016; 164:432–7.
64. Sclafani A, Clyne AE. Hedonic response of rats to polysaccharide and sugar solutions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1987; 11(2):173–80.
65. Sclafani A, Mann S. Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared. Physiology & Behavior. 1987; 40(5):563–8.
66. Poole RL, Aleman TR, Ellis HT, Tordoff MG. Maltodextrin acceptance and preference in eight mouse strains. Chemical senses. 2015; 41(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjv056 PMID: 26464499
67. Rollo I, Williams C, Gant N, Nute M. The influence of carbohydrate mouth rinse on self-selected speeds during a 30-min treadmill run. International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism. 2008; 18 (6):585–600. PMID: 19164829
68. Jeukendrup AE. Carbohydrate and exercise performance: the role of multiple transportable carbohydrates. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. 2010; 13(4):452–7.
69. Jeukendrup AE, Chambers ES. Oral carbohydrate sensing and exercise performance. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. 2010; 13(4):447–51.
70. Beaven CM, Maulder P, Pooley A, Kilduff L, Cook C. Effects of caffeine and carbohydrate mouth rinses on repeated sprint performance. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2013; 38(6):633–7. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2012-0333 PMID: 23724880
71. Carter JM, Jeukendrup AE, Jones DA. The effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on 1-h cycle time trial performance. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2004; 36:2107–11. PMID: 15570147
72. Fares E-J, Kayser B. Carbohydrate mouth rinse effects on exercise capacity in pre-and postprandial States. Journal of nutrition and metabolism. 2011;2011.
73. Pottier A, Bouckaert J, Gilis W, Roels T, Derave W. Mouth rinse but not ingestion of a carbohydrate solution improves 1-h cycle time trial performance. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2010; 20(1):105–11.
74. Rollo I, Cole M, Miller R, Williams C. Influence of mouth rinsing a carbohydrate solution on 1-h running performance. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2010; 42(4):798–804. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181bac6e4 PMID: 19952850
75. Sinclair J, Bottoms L, Flynn C, Bradley E, Alexander G, McCullagh S, et al. The effect of different durations of carbohydrate mouth rinse on cycling performance. European Journal of Sport Science. 2014; 14(3):259–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.785599 PMID: 23578290
76. Chambers E, Bridge M, Jones D. Carbohydrate sensing in the human mouth: effects on exercise performance and brain activity. The Journal of physiology. 2009; 587(8):1779–94.
77. Vigorito M, Sclafani A, Jacquin MF. Effects of gustatory deafferentation on Polycose and sucrose appetite in the rat. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1987; 11(2):201–9.