Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: Recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 109, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1528-1545

  Johnson, David A ^a   Barkun, Alan N ^b   Cohen, Larry B ^c   Dominitz, Jason A ^d   Kaltenbach, Tonya ^e   Martel, Myriam ^b   Robertson, Douglas J ^f,g   Boland, C Richard ^h   Giardello, Frances M ⁱ   Lieberman, David A ^j   Levin, Theodore R ^k   Rex, Douglas K ^l  

^a EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^l INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROLYTE; MACROGOL; MACROGOL 3350; MAGNESIUM CITRATE; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; SULFATE; ENEMA; LAXATIVE;

BARIATRIC SURGERY; COLON ADENOMA; COLON LAVAGE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; CONSENSUS; DIET; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FOLLOW UP; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SALVAGE THERAPY; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LAVAGE; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; ENEMA; HUMANS; THERAPEUTIC IRRIGATION;

EID: 85027954198     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.272     Document Type: Review

References (253)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10-29.
2. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378-84.
3. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 76-9.
4. Chan WK, Saravanan A, Manikam J et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11: 86.
5. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1696-700.
6. Senore C, Ederle A, Fantin A et al. Acceptability and side-eff ects of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in a screening setting. J Med Screen 2011; 18: 128-34.
7. Bond JH Jr, Levitt MD. Factors aff ecting the concentration of combustible gases in the colon during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1975; 68: 1445-8.
8. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-6.
9. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309: 1286-91.
10. Sherer EA, Imler TD, Imperiale TF. Th e eff ect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 545-53.
11. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. Th e impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1207-14.
12. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1197-203.
13. Hong SN, Sung IK, Kim JH et al. Th e eff ect of the bowel preparation status on the risk of missing polyp and adenoma during screening colonoscopy: a tandem colonoscopic study. Clin Endosc 2012; 45: 404-11.
14. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. Th e impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2680-5.
15. Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L et al. Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 554-8.
16. Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z et al. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 2623-30.
17. Kim ER, Sinn DH, Kim JY et al. Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1690-5.
18. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Riccio G et al. Eff ective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 313-20.
19. Eun CS, Han DS, Hyun YS et al. Th e timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 539-44.
20. Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 700-6.
21. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1240-5.
22. Cohen LB. Split dosing of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an analysis of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 406-12.
23. Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA et al. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1225-31.
24. Menard C, Barkun A, Martel M et al. A meta-analysis of colon cleansing with PEG compared to other bowel preparations. Gastrointest Endosc (2014). In press
25. Jover R, Zapater P, Polania E et al. Modifi able endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 381-9.
26. Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 603-8.
27. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 894-909
28. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance aft er screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-57.
29. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 739-50.
30. Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 142-50.
31. Rodriguez De Miguel C, Serradesanferm A, Del Manzano S et al. Timing of polyethylene glycol administration is a key factor in the tolerability and efficacy of colon preparation in colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 35: 236-42.
32. Church JM. Eff ectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy-timing is the key!. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 1223-5.
33. Matro R, Shnitser A, Spodik M et al. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for aft ernoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1954-61.
34. Varughese S, Kumar AR, George A et al. Morning-only one-gallon polyethylene glycol improves bowel cleansing for aft ernoon colonoscopies: a randomized endoscopist-blinded prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2368-74.
35. Longcroft -Wheaton G, Bhandari P. Same-day bowel cleansing regimen is superior to a split-dose regimen over two days for aft ernoon colonoscopy: results from a large prospective series. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 57-61
36. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 495-511
37. Agrawal D, Robbins R, Rockey DC. Gastric residual volume is trivial soon aft er polyethylene glycol bowel preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: AB149-AB150.
38. Huff man M, Unger RZ, Th atikonda C et al. Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fl uid volume: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 516-22.
39. Unger RZ, Amstutz SP, Seo da H et al. Willingness to undergo split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and compliance with split-dose instructions. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2030-4.
40. Khan MA, Piotrowski Z, Brown MD. Patient acceptance, convenience, and efficacy of single-dose versus split-dose colonoscopy bowel preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 310-1.
41. Belsey J, Crosta C, Epstein O et al. Meta-analysis: the relative efficacy of oral bowel preparations for colonoscopy 1985-2010. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2012; 35: 222-37.
42. Wu KL, Rayner CK, Chuah SK et al. Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 107-12.
43. Koh DH, Lee HL, Kwon YI et al. Th e eff ect of eating lunch before an aft ernoon colonoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology 2011; 58: 775-8.
44. Soweid AM, Kobeissy AA, Jamali FR et al. A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fi ber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 633-8.
45. Park DI, Park SH, Lee SK et al. Efficacy of prepackaged, low residual test meals with 4L polyethylene glycol versus a clear liquid diet with 4L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation: a randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 24: 988-91.
46. Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 213-8.
47. Delegge M, Kaplan R. Efficacy of bowel preparation with the use of a prepackaged, low fi bre diet with a low sodium, magnesium citrate cathartic vs. a clear liquid diet with a standard sodium phosphate cathartic. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2005; 21: 1491-5.
48. Sipe BW, Fischer M, Baluyut AR et al. A low-residue diet improved patient satisfaction with split-dose oral sulfate solution without impairing colonic preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 932-6.
49. Abuksis G, Mor M, Segal N et al. A patient education program is costeff ective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1786-90.
50. Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 804-11.
51. Calderwood AH, Lai EJ, Fix OK et al. An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 307-14.
52. Smith SG, von Wagner C, McGregor LM et al. Th e influence of health literacy on comprehension of a colonoscopy preparation information leafl et. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 1074-80.
53. Spiegel BM, Talley J, Shekelle P et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 875-83.
54. Nash D, Azeez S, Vlahov D et al. Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting. J Urban Health 2006; 83: 231-43.
55. Chen LA, Santos S, Jandorf L et al. A program to enhance completion of screening colonoscopy among urban minorities. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 443-50.
56. Jandorf L, Stossel LM, Cooperman JL et al. Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities. Cancer 2013; 119: 612-20.
57. Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 757-66.
58. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-85.
59. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-308.
60. Rex DK, Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1410-3.
61. Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M et al. A predictive model identifi es patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 501-6.
62. Available http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/ SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm094900.htm Accessed January 31, 2014.
63. Abut E, Guveli H, Yasar B et al. Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 515-21.
64. Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ et al. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 229-33. discussion 233-234
65. Cesaro P, Hassan C, Spada C et al. A new low-volume isosmotic polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl versus split-dose 4 L polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 23-7.
66. Corporaal S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ et al. plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 1380-6.
67. Di Febo G, Gizzi G, Calo G et al. Comparison of a new colon lavage solution (Iso-Giuliani) with a standard preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized study. Endoscopy 1990; 22: 214-6.
68. DiPalma JA, Wolff BG, Meagher A et al. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2187-91.
69. Enestvedt BK, Fennerty MB, Eisen GM. Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2011; 33: 33-40
70. Gentile M, De Rosa M, Cestaro G et al. 2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid versus 4 L PEG plus simethicon for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized single-blind clinical trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2013; 23: 276-80.
71. Haapamaki MM, Lindstrom M, Sandzen B. Low-volume bowel preparation is inferior to standard 4 l polyethylene glycol. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 897-901
72. Hangartner PJ, Munch R, Meier J et al. Comparison of three colon cleansing methods: evaluation of a randomized clinical trial with 300 ambulatory patients. Endoscopy 1989; 21: 272-5.
73. Hjelkrem M, Stengel J, Liu M et al. MiraLAX is not as eff ective as GoLytely in bowel cleansing before screening colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 326-32. e1
74. Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner SJ. Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2006; 20: 101-5.
75. Huppertz-Hauss G, Bretthauer M, Sauar J et al. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 537-41.
76. Jansen SV, Goedhard JG, Winkens B et al. Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing diff erent regimes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 897-902
77. Kao D, Lalor E, Sandha G et al. A randomized controlled trial of four precolonoscopy bowel cleansing regimens. Can J Gastroenterol 2011; 25: 657-62.
78. Ker TS. Comparison of reduced volume versus four-liter electrolyte lavage solutions for colon cleansing. Am Surg 2006; 72: 909-11.
79. Mathus-Vliegen EM, Safety van der Vliet K.. patient's tolerance, and efficacy of a 2-liter vitamin C-enriched macrogol bowel preparation: a randomized, endoscopist-blinded prospective comparison with a 4-liter macrogol solution. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 1002-12.
80. McKenna T, Macgill A, Porat G et al. Colonoscopy preparation: polyethylene glycol with Gatorade is as safe and efficacious as four liters of polyethylene glycol with balanced electrolytes. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 3098-105.
81. Park SS, Sinn DH, Kim Y-H et al. Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1319-26.
82. Ponchon T, Boustiere C, Heresbach D et al. A low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: the NORMO randomised clinical trial. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 820-6.
83. Pontone S, Angelini R, Standoli M et al. Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4689-95.
84. Samarasena JB, Muthusamy VR, Jamal MM. Split-dosed MiraLAX/ Gatorade is an eff ective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1036-42.
85. Seo EH, Kim TO, Park MJ et al. Low-volume morning-only polyethylene glycol with specially designed test meals versus standard-volume splitdose polyethylene glycol with standard diet for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Digestion 2013; 88: 110-8.
86. Sharma VK, Chockalingham SK, Ugheoke EA et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 167-71.
87. Sharma VK, Schaberg JW, Chockalingam SK et al. Th e eff ect of stimulant laxatives and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation on serum electrolytes and hemodynamics. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 32: 238-9.
88. Valiante F, Pontone S, Hassan C et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 224-7.
89. Vilien M, Rytkonen M. Golytely preparation for colonoscopy - 1.5 liters is enough for outpatients. Endoscopy 1990; 22: 168-70.
90. Abdul-Baki H, Hashash JG, ElHajj II et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or splitdose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 294-300
91. Chakravarty BJ, Fraser A, Hamilton I et al. A randomised blinded study in colonic lavage for colonoscopy. Aust N Z J Med 1991; 21: 769-71.
92. Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2275-84.
93. Rex DK, Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 328-36.
94. Dakkak M, Aziz K, Bennett JR. Comparison of two orally administered bowel preparations for colonoscopy-polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulphate. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 1992; 6: 513-9.
95. Hamilton D, Mulcahy D, Walsh D et al. Sodium picosulphate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomised trial. Br J Clin Pract 1996; 50: 73-5.
96. Katz PO, Rex DK, Epstein M et al. A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 401-9.
97. Lawrance IC, Willert RP, Murray K. Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 412-8.
98. Manes G, Amato A, Arena M et al. Efficacy and acceptability of sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate versus low-volume PEG-ascorbic acid for colon cleansing: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 1145-53.
99. Regev A, Fraser G, Delpre G et al. Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 1478-82.
100. Rex DK, Katz PO, Bertiger G et al. Split-dose administration of a dualaction, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 132-41.
101. Saunders BP, Masaki T, Fukumoto M et al. Th e quest for a more acceptable bowel preparation: comparison of a polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution and a mannitol/Picolax mixture for colonoscopy. Postgrad Med J 1995; 71: 476-9.
102. Voiosu T, Ratiu I, Voiosu A et al. Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2013; 22: 129-34.
103. Worthington J, Th yssen M, Chapman G et al. A randomised controlled trial of a new 2 litre polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate+magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 481-8.
104. Yoshioka K, Connolly AB, Ogunbiyi OA et al. Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Dig Surg 2000; 17: 66-70
105. Schmidt LM, Williams P, King D et al. Picoprep-3 (TM) is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet (TM): a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 238-42.
106. Tjandra JJ, Chan M, Tagkalidis PP. Oral sodium phosphate (Fleet) is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Picopre (sodium picosulfate-based preparation). Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 616-20.
107. Renaut AJ, Raniga S, Frizelle FA et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and acceptability of phospo-soda buff ered saline (Fleet®) with sodium picosulphate/ magnesium citrate (Picoprep®) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 503-5.
108. Aihara H, Saito S, Arakawa H et al. Comparison of two sodium phosphate tablet-based regimens and a polyethylene glycol regimen for colon cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomized prospective pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1023-30.
109. Hookey LC, Vanner SJ. Pico-Salax plus two-day bisacodyl is superior to Pico-Salax alone or oral sodium phosphate for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 703-9.
110. Flemming JA, Vanner SJ, Hookey LC. Split-dose picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid solution markedly enhances colon cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 537-44.
111. Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 3389-96.
112. Markowitz GS, Perazella MA. Acute phosphate nephropathy. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 1027-34.
113. Brunelli SM, Lewis JD, Gupta M et al. Risk of kidney injury following oral phosphosoda bowel preparations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 3199-205.
114. Young CJ, Simpson RR, King DW et al. Oral sodium phosphate solution is a superior colonoscopy preparation to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1568-71.
115. Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 422-7.
116. Th omson A, Naidoo P, Crotty B. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized prospective trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 11: 103-7.
117. Tasci I, Altinli E, Sirin F. Bowel cleansing for diagnostic colonoscopy: which method is preferable? Istanbul experience. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7: 18-21.
118. Seo EH, Kim TO, Kim TG et al. Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose PEG compared with split-dose aqueous sodium phosphate for outpatient colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56 : 2963-71.
119. Schanz S, Kruis W, Mickisch O et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy with sodium phosphate solution versus polyethylene glycol-based lavage: a multicenter trial. Diagn Th er Endosc 2008; 2008: 713521.
120. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E, Dube C et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing diff erent regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 544-52.
121. Reddy DN, Rao GV, Sriram PVJ. Efficacy and safety of oral sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Indian J Gastroenterol 2002; 21: 219-21.
122. Poon CM, Lee DWH, Mak SK et al. Two liters of polyethylene glycolelectrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 560-3.
123. Picchio M, Gallinaro L, Ceci F et al. Comparison of standard polyethylene glycol and two doses of oral sodium phosphate solution in precolonoscopy bowel preparation: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2008; 71: 15-20.
124. Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A et al. Th e timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a signifi cant factor contributing to the detection of fl at lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 6161-6.
125. Mathus-Vliegen EMH, Kemble UM. A prospective randomized blinded comparison of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for safe bowel cleansing. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2006; 23: 543-52.
126. Martinek J, Hess J, Delarive J et al. Cisapride does not improve precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 180-5.
127. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycolelectrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 631-4.
128. Marin Gabriel JC, Rodriguez Munoz S, de la Cruz Bertolo J et al. Electrolytic disturbances and colonoscopy: bowel lavage solutions, age and procedure. [Spanish, English]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2003; 95: 863-75.
129. Malik P, Balaban DH, Th ompson WO et al. Randomized study comparing two regimens of oral sodium phosphates solution versus low-dose polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 833-41.
130. Macedo EP, Ferrari AP. Comparative study among three methods for oral colonoscopy preparation: mannitol, polyethylene glycol and oral sodium phosphate enema. Dig Endosc 2003; 15: 43-7.
131. Lee J, McCallion K, Acheson AG et al. A prospective randomised study comparing polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopy. Ulster Med J 1999; 68: 68-72
132. Law WL, Choi HK, Chu KW et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyethylene glycol solution, one dose and two doses of oral sodium phosphate solution. Asian J Surg 2004; 27: 120-4.
133. Lapalus MG, Gaudin JL, Lemkecher T et al. Prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with polyethylene glycol-based solution for colonoscopy preparation. [French]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001; 25: 29-34
134. Kossi J, Kontula I, Laato M. Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in bowel cleansing and shortens the time it takes to visualize colon mucosa. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 1187-90.
135. Korsten MA, Spungen AM, Rosman AR et al. A prospective assessment of renal impairment aft er preparation for colonoscopy: oral sodium phosphate appears to be safe in well-hydrated subjects with normal renal status. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2021-9.
136. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR et al. A comparison of the eff ectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1218-23.
137. Kastenberg D, Chasen R, Choudhary C et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 705-13.
138. Kastenberg D, Barish C, Burack H et al. Tolerability and patient acceptance of sodium phosphate tablets compared with 4-L PEG solution in colon cleansing: combined results of 2 identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase 3 trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 54-61
139. Kambe H, Yamaji Y, Sugimoto T et al. A randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol solution for polyp detection. J Dig Dis 2012; 13: 374-80.
140. Johanson JF, Popp JW Jr, Cohen LB et al. A randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets with 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2238-46.
141. Hwang KL, Chen WTL, Hsiao KH et al. Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 7486-93.
142. Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner SJ. A prospective randomized trial comparing low-dose oral sodium phosphate plus stimulant laxatives with large volume polyethylene glycol solution for colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2217-22.
143. Henderson JM, Barnett JL, Turgeon DK et al. Single-day, divided-dose oral sodium phosphate laxative versus intestinal lavage as preparation for colonoscopy: efficacy and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 238-43.
144. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 100-4.
145. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R et al. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01). Endoscopy 2003; 35: 300-4.
146. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 689-96.
147. Clarkston WK, Tsen TN, Dies DF et al. Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 42-8.
148. Chia YW, Cheng LC, Goh PMY et al. Role of oral sodium phosphate and its eff ectiveness in large bowel preparation for out-patient colonoscopy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1995; 40: 374-6.
149. Chen TA, Wong HY, Lin CK et al. High-dose bisacodyl plus water lavage compared with oral sodium phosphate as bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy. J Chin Med Assoc 2009; 72: 402-7.
150. Canard JM, Gorce D, Napoleon B et al. Fleet Phospho-soda for a better acceptability of colon preparation prior to colonoscopy: a single-blind, randomized, comparative study versus polyethylene glycol. [French]. Acta Endoscopica 2001; 31: 703-8.
151. Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2006; 24: 1631-42.
152. Bektas H, Balik E, Bilsel Y et al. Comparison of sodium phosphate, polyethylene glycol and senna solutions in bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical study. Dig Endosc 2005; 17: 290-6.
153. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH et al. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 346-52.
154. Arezzo A. Prospective randomized trial comparing bowel cleaning preparations for colonoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10: 215-7.
155. Antonakopoulos N, Kyrlagkitsis I, Xourgias V et al. Comparison of two cathartic preparations, peg-electrolytes solution and sodium phosphate salts, as means for large bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Ann Gastroenterol 2004; 17: 276-9.
156. Afridi SA, Barthel JS, King PD et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 485-9.
157. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations- which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 594-9.
158. Unal S, Dogan UB, Ozturk Z et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1998; 61: 281-4.
159. Wruble L, Demicco M, Medoff J et al. Residue-free sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep) versus Visicol for colon cleansing: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 660-70.
160. Available http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/ DevelopmentResources/Over-the CounterOTCDrugs/StatusofOTCRulemakings/ ucm093981.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2014
161. Gerard DP, Holden JL, Foster DB et al. Randomized trial of Gatorade/ polyethylene glycol with or without bisacodyl and NuLYTELY for colonoscopy preparation. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2012; 3: e16.
162. Schoenfeld P. Safety of MiraLAX/Gatorade bowel preparation has not been established in appropriately designed studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 582.
163. Vradelis S, Kalaitzakis E, Sharifi Y et al. Addition of senna improves quality of colonoscopy preparation with magnesium citrate. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1759-63.
164. Choi YS, Suh JP, Kim JK et al. Magnesium citrate with a single dose of sodium phosphate for colonoscopy bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 242-8.
165. Berkelhammer C, Ekambaram A, Silva RG. Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 89-94
166. Schelling JR. Fatal hypermagnesemia. Clin Nephrol 2000; 53: 61-5.
167. Kontani M, Hara A, Ohta S et al. Hypermagnesemia induced by massive cathartic ingestion in an elderly woman without pre-existing renal dysfunction. Intern Med 2005; 44: 448-52.
168. Shavakhi A, Kianinia M, Torabi G et al. High dose senna or poly ethylene glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial. J Res Med Sci 2011; 16: 149-55.
169. Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S et al. Half doses of PEG-ES and senna vs. high-dose senna for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 675-81.
170. Radaelli F, Meucci G, Imperiali G et al. High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2674-80.
171. Rasmussen M, Bohlbro K, Qvist N. Oral sodium phosphate compared with water enemas combined with bisacodyl as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 1090-4.
172. Wu L, Cao Y, Liao C et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Simethicone for gastrointestinal endoscopic visibility. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 227-35.
173. Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 3032-7.
174. Sudduth RH, DeAngelis S, Sherman KE et al. Th e eff ectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy when given with a sodium phosphate solution: a double-bind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 413-5.
175. Sanaka MR, Super DM, Mullen KD et al. Use of tegaserod along with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2006; 23: 669-74.
176. Mishima Y, Amano Y, Okita K et al. Efficacy of prokinetic agents in improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Digestion 2008; 77: 166-72.
177. Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V et al. Efficacy of mosapride citrate with polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 2517-25.
178. Kim HJ, Kim TO, Shin BC et al. Efficacy of prokinetics with a split-dose of polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Digestion 2012; 86: 194-200
179. Beyazit Y, Koklu S, Ozturk ZA et al. Inclusion of a spasmolytic in bowel cleansing: a prospective randomized study. Gastroenterol Nurs 2011; 34: 352-5.
180. Repici A, Cestari R, Annese V et al. Randomised clinical trial: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a comparison between two diff erent PEG-based formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2012; 36: 717-24.
181. Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, Von Althann C et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2010; 32: 637-44.
182. Sharara AI, El-Halabi MM, Abou Fadel CG et al. Sugar-free menthol candy drops improve the palatability and bowel cleansing eff ect of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 866-91.
183. Lee H, Kim YH, Kim JH et al. A feasibility study of probiotics pretreatment as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy in constipated patients. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2344-51.
184. Park JS, Sohn CI, Hwang SJ et al. Quality and eff ect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 616-9.
185. Miki P Jr, Lemos CR, Popoutchi P et al. Comparison of colon-cleansing methods in preparation for colonoscopy-comparative efficacy of solutions of mannitol, sodium picosulfate and monobasic and dibasic sodium phosphates. Acta Cir Bras 2008; 23: Suppl 1 108-11.
186. Ko CW, Riffl e S, Shapiro JA et al. Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities aft er screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 648-56.
187. Lukens FJ, Loeb DS, Machicao VI et al. Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a prospective outpatient study. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1722-5.
188. Jafri SM, Monkemuller K, Lukens FJ. Endoscopy in the elderly: a review of the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 161-6.
189. Seinela L, Pehkonen E, Laasanen T et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy in very old patients: a randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 216-20.
190. Beloosesky Y, Grinblat J, Weiss A et al. Electrolyte disorders following oral sodium phosphate administration for bowel cleansing in elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 803-8.
191. Gumurdulu Y, Serin E, Ozer B et al. Age as a predictor of hyperphosphatemia aft er oral phosphosoda administration for colon preparation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19: 68-72
192. Ho JM, Juurlink DN, Cavalcanti RB. Hypokalemia following polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy in older hospitalized patients with signifi cant comorbidities. Ann Pharmacother 2010; 44: 466-70.
193. Ho JM, Gruneir A, Fischer HD et al. Serious events in older Ontario residents receiving bowel preparations for outpatient colonoscopy with various comorbidity profi les: a descriptive, population-based study. Can J Gastroenterol 2012; 26: 436-40.
194. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Lee KK, Anderson MA et al. Modifi cations in endoscopic practice for pediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 1-9.
195. Lichtenstein GR, Cohen LB, Uribarri J. Review article: bowel preparation for colonoscopy-the importance of adequate hydration. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2007; 26: 633-41.
196. Hunter A, Mamula P. Bowel preparation for pediatric colonoscopy procedures. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 51: 254-61.
197. Fox VL. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. In: editors Walker WA, Durie PR, Hamilton JR et al. Pediatric gastrointestinal disease BC Decker: Hamilton, Ontario, 2000, p 1415.
198. Trautwein AL, Vinitski LA, Peck SN. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the pediatric patient: a randomized study. Gastroenterol Nurs 1996; 19: 137-9.
199. Sondheimer JM, Sokol RJ, Taylor SF et al. Safety, efficacy, and tolerance of intestinal lavage in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. J Pediatr 1991; 119: 148-52.
200. Dahshan A, Lin CH, Peters J et al. A randomized, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy in children. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 3497-501.
201. Pashankar DS, Uc A, Bishop WP. Polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes: a new safe, eff ective, and palatable bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr 2004; 144: 358-62.
202. Safder S, Demintieva Y, Rewalt M et al. Stool consistency and stool frequency are excellent clinical markers for adequate colon preparation aft er polyethylene glycol 3350 cleansing protocol: a prospective clinical study in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1131-5.
203. Adamiak T, Altaf M, Jensen MK et al. One-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350: an eff ective regimen for colonoscopy in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 573-7.
204. Phatak UP, Johnson S, Husain SZ et al. Two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350 and bisacodyl: a new, safe, and eff ective regimen for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53: 71-4.
205. Turner D, Benchimol EI, Dunn H et al. Pico-Salax versus polyethylene glycol for bowel cleanout before colonoscopy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 1038-45.
206. Pinfi eld A, Stringer MD. Randomised trial of two pharmacological methods of bowel preparation for day case colonoscopy. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80: 181-3.
207. Gremse DA, Sacks AI, Raines S. Comparison of oral sodium phosphate to polyethylene glycol-based solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1996; 23: 586-90.
208. da Silva MM, Briars GL, Patrick MK et al. Colonoscopy preparation in children: safety, efficacy, and tolerance of high- versus low-volume cleansing methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 24: 33-7.
209. Sabri M, Di Lorenzo C, Henderson W et al. Colon cleansing with oral sodium phosphate in adolescents: dose, efficacy, acceptability, and safety. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1533-9.
210. El-Baba MF, Padilla M, Houston C et al. A prospective study comparing oral sodium phosphate solution to a bowel cleansing preparation with nutrition food package in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006; 42: 174-7.
211. Turner D, Levine A, Weiss B et al. Evidence-based recommendations for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in children: a report from a national working group. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1063-70.
212. Meisel JL, Bergman D, Graney D et al. Human rectal mucosa: proctoscopic and morphological changes caused by laxatives. Gastroenterology 1977; 72: 1274-9.
213. Atkinson RJ, Save V, Hunter JO. Colonic ulceration aft er sodium phosphate bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2603-5.
214. Watts DA, Lessells AM, Penman ID et al. Endoscopic and histologic features of sodium phosphate bowel preparation-induced colonic ulceration: case report and review. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 584-7.
215. Hixson LJ. Colorectal ulcers associated with sodium phosphate catharsis. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 101-2.
216. Zwas FR, Cirillo NW, el-Serag HB et al. Colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with oral sodium phosphate solution. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 463-6.
217. Rejchrt S, Bures J, Siroky M et al. A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phosphate for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 651-4.
218. Chan A, Depew W, Vanner S. Use of oral sodium phosphate colonic lavage solution by Canadian colonoscopists: pitfalls and complications. Can J Gastroenterol 1997; 11: 334-8.
219. Driman DK, Preiksaitis HG. Colorectal infl ammation and increased cell proliferation associated with oral sodium phosphate bowel preparation solution. Hum Pathol 1998; 29: 972-8.
220. Wong NA, Penman ID, Campbell S et al. Microscopic focal cryptitis associated with sodium phosphate bowel preparation. Histopathology 2000; 36: 476-8.
221. Heber D, Greenway FL, Kaplan LM et al. Endocrine and nutritional management of the post-bariatric surgery patient: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 4823-43.
222. ASGE Standard of Practice Committee. Shergill AK, Ben-Menachem T et al. Guidelines for endoscopy in pregnant and lactating women. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 18-24.
223. Nardulli G, Limongi F, Sue G et al. Use of polyethylene glycol in the treatment of puerperal constipation. G E N 1995; 49: 224-6.
224. Rimensberger P, Schubiger G, Willi U. Connatal rickets following repeated administration of phosphate enemas in pregnancy: a case report. Eur J Pediatr 1992; 151: 54-6.
225. Mahadevan U, Kane S. American Gastroenterological Association Institute medical position statement on the use of gastrointestinal medications in pregnancy. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 278-82.
226. Vinod J, Bonheur J, Korelitz BI et al. Choice of laxatives and colonoscopic preparation in pregnant patients from the viewpoint of obstetricians and gastroenterologists. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 6549-52.
227. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. Th e outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy aft er preparation failure in the fi rst procedure. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 626-30.
228. Fatima H, Johnson CS, Rex DK. Patients' description of rectal effl uent and quality of bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1244-52.
229. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M et al. Colonoscopic enema as rescue for inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a prospective, observational study. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e735-e739.
230. Sohn N, Weinstein MA. Management of the poorly prepared colonoscopy patient: colonoscopic colon enemas as a preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 462-6.
231. Ibanez M, Parra-Blanco A, Zaballa P et al. Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy aft er preparation failure. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1578-84.
232. Hwang S, Oh J, Tavanapong W et al. Stool detection in colonoscopy videos. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008: 3004-7.
233. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 482-6.
234. Aronchick C, Lipshutz W, Wright S et al. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2667.
235. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G et al. Th e Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-5.
236. Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 686-92.
237. Anderson E, Baker JD. Bowel preparation eff ectiveness: inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterol Nurs 2007; 30: 400-4.
238. Athreya PJ, Owen GN, Wong SW et al. Achieving quality in colonoscopy: bowel preparation timing and colon cleanliness. Aust N Z J Surg 2011; 81: 261-5.
239. Borg BB, Gupta NK, Zuckerman GR et al. Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 670-5.
240. Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 448-52.
241. Harewood GC, Wright CA, Baron TH. Assessment of patients' perceptions of bowel preparation quality at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 2004, 839-43.
242. Hendry PO, Jenkins JT, Diament RH. Th e impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis 9: 2007, 745-8.
243. Lebwohl B, Wang TC, Neugut AI. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2014-20.
244. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1797-802.
245. Nguyen DL, Wieland M. Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2010; 19: 369-72.
246. Qureshi A, Ismail S, Azmi A et al. Poor bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Med J Malaysia 2000; 55: 246-8.
247. Reilly T, Walker G. Reasons for poor colonic preparation with inpatients. Gastroenterol Nurs 2004; 27: 115-7.
248. Taylor C, Schubert ML. Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution (golytely) in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 710-4.
249. Hayes A, Buff um M, Hughes J. Diabetic colon preparation comparison study. Gastroenterol Nurs 2011; 34: 377-82.
250. Lim SW, Seo YW, Sinn DH et al. Impact of previous gastric or colonic resection on polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1554-9.
251. Stiens SA, Bergman SB, Goetz LL. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction aft er spinal cord injury: clinical evaluation and rehabilitative management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: S86-S102.
252. Ancha HR, Spungen AM, Bauman WA et al. Clinical trial: the efficacy and safety of routine bowel cleansing agents for elective colonoscopy in persons with spinal cord injury - a randomized prospective single-blind study. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2009; 30: 1110-7.
253. Barber DB, Rogers SJ, Chen JT et al. Pilot evaluation of a nurse-administered carepath for successful colonoscopy for persons with spinal cord injury. SCI Nurs 1999; 16: 14-15.