Efficacy of prokinetics with a split-dose of polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial

Digestion

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 194-200

  Kim, Hyoung Jun ^a   Kim, Tae Oh ^a   Shin, Bong Chul ^a   Woo, Jae Gon ^a   Seo, Eun Hee ^a   Joo, Hee Rin ^a   Heo, Nae Yun ^a   Park, Jongha ^a   Park, Seung Ha ^a   Yang, Sung Yeon ^a   Moon, Young Soo ^a   Shin, Jin Yong ^a   Lee, Nae Young ^b  

^a Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Silla University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Prokinetics

Indexed keywords

ITOMED; ITOPRIDE; MACROGOL; PROKINETIC AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL DISTENSION; ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; ARTICLE; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; DRUG EFFICACY; EVENING DOSAGE; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; INTESTINE FLUID; INTESTINE MOTILITY; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MORNING DOSAGE; NAUSEA; OTTAWA SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SEGMENTAL FLUIDITY SCALE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SLEEP DISORDER; VOMITING;

BENZAMIDES; BENZYL COMPOUNDS; COLON; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG COMBINATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 84865061378     PISSN: 00122823     EISSN: 14219867     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000339780     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. National Cancer Information Center (2009) Cancer Registration Statistics Korea 2009. http://www.cancer.go.kr/ncic/cics-g/cics-g02/cics-g027/1647906-6065. html (accessed December 2011).
2. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G: Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162-168.
3. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Lewis LH, Gerdes H, Stewart ET: Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Work group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981.
4. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N: Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1797-1802.
5. Bloom B, Shustina A, Gaetano JN, Gualtieri N, Tievsky D, Robilotti JG: Does constipation predict the quality of bowel preparation during colonoscopy? Frontline Gastroenterol 2010; 1: 165-170.
6. Jeong CW, Shim SG, Park GT, Oh JE, Yi JE, Woo JG: Effect of previous abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy. Korean J Gastrointest Endoscopy 2011; 42: 283-288.
7. Dafnis G, Granath F, Påhlman L, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P: Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37: 113-118.
8. Hendry PO, Jenkins JT, Diament RH: The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 745-748.
9. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP: Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378-384.
10. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P: Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 76-79.
11. Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S, Man R, Rutter MD, Suzuki N, Swain D, Thuraisingam A, Atkin W: Judgment of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 456-460.