Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Jover, Rodrigo ^a   Zapater, Pedro ^a   Polanía, Eduardo ^a   Bujanda, Luis ^b   Lanas, Angel ^c   Hermo, José A ^d   Cubiella, Joaquín ^d   Ono, Akiko ^e   González Méndez, Yanira ^f   Peris, Antonio ^d   Pellisé, María ^g   Seoane, Agustín ^h   Herreros De Tejada, Alberto ⁱ   Ponce, Marta ^j   Marín Gabriel, José C ^k   Chaparro, María ^l   Cacho, Guillermo ^m   Fernández Díez, Servando ⁿ   Arenas, Juan ^d   Sopeña, Federico ^c   De Castro, Luisa ^d   Vega Villaamil, Pablo ^d   Rodríguez Soler, María ^a   Carballo, Fernando ^e   Salas, Dolores ^o   Morillas, Juan D ⁿ   Andreu, Montserrat ^h   Quintero, Enrique ^f   Castells, Antoni ^g   more..

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^d Complexo Hospitalario de Vigo ^*  (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DE LA ARRIXACA   (Spain)

^f HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^h HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

ⁱ HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PUERTA DE HIERRO   (Spain)

^j HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA FE   (Spain)

^k HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO 12 DE OCTUBRE   (Spain)

^l HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE LA PRINCESA   (Spain)

^m HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO FUNDACIÓN ALCORCÓN   (Spain)

ⁿ HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^o Fundación Hospital de Alcorcón ^*  (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITRAFLEET; LAXATIVE; MACROGOL; MOVIPREP; PICOSULFATE SODIUM; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEDATION;

EID: 84873745096     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. W.S. Atkin, R. Edwards, I. Kralj-Hans Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet 375 2010 1624 1633
2. J.S. Mandel, J.H. Bond, T.R. Church Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study N Engl J Med 328 1993 1365 1371
3. R.E. Schoen, P.F. Pinsky, J.L. Weissfeld Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy N Engl J Med 366 2012 2345 2357
4. A.G. Zauber, S.J. Winawer, M.J. O'Brien Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths N Engl J Med 366 2012 687 696
5. S.J. Winawer, A.G. Zauber, M.N. Ho Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy The National Polyp Study Workgroup N Engl J Med 329 1993 1977 1981
6. J.C. van Rijn, J.B. Reitsma, J. Stoker Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 343 350
7. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
8. E. Quintero, A. Castells, L. Bujanda Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening N Engl J Med 366 2012 697 706
9. C.A. Aronchick Bowel preparation scale Gastrointest Endosc 60 2004 1037 1038
10. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut Epub 2012 Mar 22.
11. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541
12. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, R.L. Greenlaw Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 2008 1091 1098
13. J.F. Bretagne, S. Hamonic, C. Piette Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 335 341
14. S.C. Chen, D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861
15. T.F. Imperiale, E.A. Glowinski, B.E. Juliar Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 1288 1295
16. R. Jover, M. Herraiz, O. Alarcon Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening Endoscopy 44 2012 444 451
17. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 S16 S28
18. N. Segnan, J. Patnick, L. von Karsa European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis 2010 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg
19. T.F. Imperiale, D.R. Wagner, C.Y. Lin Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings N Engl J Med 343 2000 169 174
20. D.A. Lieberman, D.G. Weiss, J.H. Bond Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380 N Engl J Med 343 2000 162 168
21. D.K. Rex, G.A. Lehman, T.M. Ulbright Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history Am J Gastroenterol 88 1993 825 831
22. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308
23. F. Radaelli, G. Meucci, G. Sgroi Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators Am J Gastroenterol 103 2008 1122 1130
24. F. Froehlich, V. Wietlisbach, J.J. Gonvers Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 61 2005 378 384
25. G.C. Harewood, V.K. Sharma, P. de Garmo Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia Gastrointest Endosc 58 2003 76 79
26. A. Parra-Blanco, D. Nicolas-Perez, A. Gimeno-Garcia The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study World J Gastroenterol 12 2006 6161 6166
27. A. Rostom, E. Jolicoeur, C. Dube A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 64 2006 544 552
28. M.S. Sawhney, M.S. Cury, N. Neeman Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection Gastroenterology 135 2008 1892 1898
29. V. Moritz, M. Bretthauer, H.K. Ruud Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis Endoscopy 44 2012 476 481
30. R.H. Lee, R.S. Tang, V.R. Muthusamy Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos) Gastrointest Endosc 74 2011 128 134
31. F. Lasisi, D.K. Rex Improving protection against proximal colon cancer by colonoscopy Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5 2011 745 754