Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1578-1584

  Ibáñez, Mercedes ^a   Parra Blanco, Adolfo ^a   Zaballa, Paz ^a   Jiménez, Alejandro ^b   Fernández Velázquez, Rosario ^a   Fernández Sordo, Jacobo Ortiz ^a   González Bernardo, Oscar ^a   Rodrigo, Luis ^a  

^a Asturias Central University Hospital   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adenoma detection; Bowel cleansing; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol; Preparation regimen

Indexed keywords

BISACODYL; DULCOLAXO; MACROGOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; LAXATIVE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON ADENOMA; COLON LAVAGE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; ADENOMA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON TUMOR; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DRINKING; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INTESTINE POLYP; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOMA; AGED; BISACODYL; CATHARTICS; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DRINKING; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL POLYPS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84855182810     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823434c8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1696-1700. (Pubitemid 34761391)
2. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointest Endosc. European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378-384. (Pubitemid 40349029)
3. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76-79. (Pubitemid 38208751)
4. Belsey J, Epstein O, Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25: 373-384. (Pubitemid 46184450)
5. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:626-630.
6. Johanson JF, Popp JW Jr, Cohen LB, et al. A randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets with 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2238-2246. (Pubitemid 47493828)
7. Lichtenstein GR, Grandhi N, Schmalz M, et al. Clinical trial: sodium phosphate tablets are preferred and better tolerated by patients compared to polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 26:1361-1370. (Pubitemid 350045602)
8. Malik P, Balaban DH, Thompson WO, Galt DJ. Randomized study comparing two regimens of oral sodium phosphates solution versus low-dose polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:833-841.
9. Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A, et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6161-6166. (Pubitemid 44688165)
10. Aihara H, Saito S, Arakawa H, et al. Comparison of two sodium phosphate tablet-based regimens and a polyethylene glycol regimen for colon cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomized prospective pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:1023-1030.
11. Juluri R, Eckert G, Imperiale TF. Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:171-181.
12. Gupta T, Mandot A, Desai D, et al. Comparison of two schedules (previous evening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2007;39:706-709. (Pubitemid 47299937)
13. Park JS, Sohn CI, Hwang SJ, et al. Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2007;39:616-619. (Pubitemid 47098999)
14. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:620-625.
15. Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ, et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:700-706.
16. Chiu HM, Lin JT, Wang HP, Lee YC, Wu MS. The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms-a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2719-2725.
17. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy-timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1223-1225. (Pubitemid 28477968)
18. Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, Cleveland MB. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2275-2284.
19. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:100-104. (Pubitemid 27056407)
20. Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:213-218. (Pubitemid 41021544)
21. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1797-1802.
22. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:96-102. (Pubitemid 46108740)
23. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027-1035. (Pubitemid 351347059)
24. Parra-Blanco A, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Nicolas-Perez D, et al. Risk for high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in colorectal flat adenomas in a Spanish population. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 29:602-609. (Pubitemid 46113830)
25. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:452-456. (Pubitemid 39091893)
26. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169-174. (Pubitemid 30489213)
27. Lieberman DA, Faigel DO, Logan JR, et al. Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:645-653.
28. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795-1803.
29. Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: how do we bridge the gap? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:673-684.
30. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:873-885.