Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - A controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 33-40

  Enestvedt, B K ^a   Fennerty, M B ^a   Eisen, G M ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISACODYL; GOLYTELY; MACROGOL 3350;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BLOATING; BOSTON BOWEL PREPARATION SCALE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIARRHEA; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG TOLERABILITY; EPIGASTRIC FULLNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSOMNIA; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASTE DISORDER;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; ELECTROLYTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649986928     PISSN: 02692813     EISSN: 13652036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04493.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS,. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980; 78: 991-5.
2. Ernstoff JJ, Howard DA, Marshall JB, Jumshyd A, McCullough AJ,. A randomized blinded clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema. Gastroenterology 1983; 84: 1512-6.
3. Thomas G, Brozinsky S, Isenberg JI,. Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage solution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1982; 82: 435-7.
4. DiPalma JA, Brady CE 3rd,. Colon cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures: polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84: 1008-16.
5. DiPalma JA, Wolff BG, Meagher A, Cleveland M,. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2187-91.
6. Toledo TK, DiPalma JA,. Review article: colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001; 15: 605-11.
7. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 689-96.
8. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Wexner SD, Beck DE, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a Task Force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1161.
9. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE Jr, et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations-which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 594-9.
10. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, King PD,. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 631-4.
11. Szojda MM, Mulder CJ, Felt-Bersma RJ,. Differences in taste between two polyethylene glycol preparations. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2007; 16: 379-81.
12. Brunelli SM, Lewis JD, Gupta M, Latif SM, Weiner MG, Feldman HI,. Risk of kidney injury following oral phosphosoda bowel preparations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 3199-205.
13. Hurst FP, Bohen EM, Osgard EM, et al. Association of oral sodium phosphate purgative use with acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 3192-8.
14. Russmann S, Lamerato L, Marfatia A, et al. Risk of impaired renal function after colonoscopy: a cohort study in patients receiving either oral sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2655-63.
15. Safder S, Demintieva Y, Rewalt M, Elitsur Y,. Stool consistency and stool frequency are excellent clinical markers for adequate colon preparation after polyethylene glycol 3350 cleansing protocol: a prospective clinical study in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1131-5.
16. Pashankar DS, Uc A, Bishop WP,. Polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes: a new safe, effective, and palatable bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr 2004; 144: 358-62.
17. Adamiak T, Altaf M, Jensen MK, et al. One-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350: an effective regimen for colonoscopy in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 573-7.
18. Stratton S, Shelton P, Carleton V, Griglione GR,. Feasibility of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 (Miralax) for colon preparation prior to lower endoscopic examination in healthy adults; experience in a community clinic setting. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2163-4.
19. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC,. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-5.
20. Mittal S,. The Boston bowel preparation scale: reliable not only for colonoscopy-oriented research but clinical practice also. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 221.