A randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets with 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for colon cleansing

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2238-2246

  Johanson, John F ^a,g   Popp Jr , John W ^b   Cohen, Lawrence B ^c   Lottes, Sandra R ^d   Forbes, William P ^d   Walker, Kelli ^d   Carter, Edwin ^e   Zhang, Bing ^f   Rose, Martin ^d  

^a Rockford Gastroenterology Associates   (United States)

^b Columbia Gastroenterology Associates ^*  (United States)

^c MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Salix Pharmaceuticals Inc ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^f MacroStat Inc   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISACODYL; MACROGOL; PHOSPHORUS; POTASSIUM; SODIUM; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE;

ABDOMINAL DISTENSION; ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGED; APHTHOUS ULCER; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON LAVAGE; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG QUALITY; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; ELECTROLYTE DISTURBANCE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HEADACHE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NAUSEA; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; PHOSPHATE BLOOD LEVEL; POTASSIUM BLOOD LEVEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SODIUM BLOOD LEVEL; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT; VITAL SIGN; VOMITING;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BISACODYL; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHATES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TABLETS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34848864519     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01363.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rex DK, Schwartz H, Goldstein M, et al. Safety and colon-cleansing efficacy of a new residue-free formulation of sodium phosphate tablets. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 : 2594 604.
2. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz W, Wright S, et al. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 1999 94 : 2667.
3. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Prepared by a Task Force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc 2006 20 : 1161.
4. Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2006 8 : 247 58.
5. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 : 1696 700.
6. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 : 1797 802.
7. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997 40 : 100 4.
8. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy-timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum 1998 41 : 1223 5.
9. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E, Dube C, et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 64 : 544 52.
10. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994 37 : 689 96.
11. Kastenberg D, Chasen R, Choudhary C, et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: Two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 54 : 705 13.
12. Afridi SA, Barthel JS, King PD, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1995 41 : 485 9.
13. Clarkston WK, Tsen TN, Dies DF, et al. Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 1996 43 : 42 8.
14. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993 88 : 1218 23.
15. Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990 85 : 422 7.
16. Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: An underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005 16 : 3389 96.
17. DiPalma JA, Wolff BG, Meagher A, et al. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 : 2187 91.
18. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, et al. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: Efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 52 : 346 52.
19. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993 39 : 631 4.
20. Khashab M, Rex DK. Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phosphate tablets (INKP-101), and a reduced sodium phosphate dose, in colon cleansing: A single-center open-label pilot trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005 21 : 465 8.