Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol

Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 129-134

  Voiosu, Theodor ^a   Raţiu, Iulia ^b   Voiosu, Andrei ^a   Iordache, Tiberiu ^a   Schipor, Adrian ^a   Bǎicuş, Cristian ^a   Sporea, Ioan ^b   Voiosu, Radu ^a  

^a Carol Davila School of Medicine   (Romania)

^b Clinical Emergency County Hospital Pius Brinzeu Timisoara   (Romania)

Author keywords

Bowel prep regimens; Colonoscopy; Patient satisfaction; Polyethylene glycol; Sodium picosulphate

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL 4000; PICOPREP; PICOSULFATE SODIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; AGED; CATHARTICS; CITRATES; CITRIC ACID; COLONOSCOPY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PICOLINES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROMANIA; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; THERAPEUTIC IRRIGATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84879152067     PISSN: 18418724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76-79.
2. Byrne MF. The curse of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1587-1590.
3. Enestvedt BK, Brian Fennerty M, Zaman A, Eisen GM. MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:775-782.
4. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach W, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-384.
5. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797-1802.
6. Singh M, Singhal S, Morris S, Anand S. Factors Affecting bowel preparation on right side of colon during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75 Suppl: AB298. Abstract.
7. Nyberg C, Hendel J, Nielsen OH. The safety of osmotically acting cathartics in colonic cleansing. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;7:557-564.
8. Shawki S, Wexner SD. How safe is bowel preparation with oral sodium phosphate solution? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;5:482-483.
9. Renaut AJ, Raniga S, Frizelle FA, Perry RE, Guilford L. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and acceptability of phospo-soda buffered saline (Fleet) with sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (Picoprep) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:503-505.
10. Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:686-692.
11. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:482-486.
12. Barkun A, Chiba N, Enns R, et al. Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety - a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper. Can J Gastroenterol 2006;20:699-710.
13. Juluri R, Eckert G, Imperiale TF. Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;32:171-181.
14. Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013;45:142-150.
15. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al; ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-885.
16. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1207-1214.
17. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:1197-1203.
18. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2013;62:236-241.
19. Juluri R, Eckert G, Imperiale TF. Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;11:38.
20. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-384.
21. Spiegel BM, Talley J, Shekelle P, et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:875-883.