Pico-Salax versus polyethylene glycol for bowel cleanout before colonoscopy in children: A randomized controlled trial

Endoscopy

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1038-1045

  Turner, D ^a   Benchimol, E I ^a   Dunn, H ^a   Griffiths, A M ^a   Frost, K ^a   Scaini, V ^a   Avolio, J ^a   Ling, S C ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROLYTE; LAXATIVE; MACROGOL; MAGNESIUM CITRATE; PEGLYTE; PICO SALAX; PICOSULFATE SODIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEHYDRATION; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG TOLERABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERMAGNESEMIA; HYPOKALEMIA; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LETHARGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; OTTAWA SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SCHOOL CHILD; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VOMITING;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADOLESCENT; CATHARTICS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COLONOSCOPY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG COSTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PICOLINES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 71549127152     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215333     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Belsey J, Epstein O, Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007 25 373-384 (Pubitemid 46184450)
2. Barkun A, Chiba N, Enns R, et al. Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper. Can J Gastroenterol 2006 20 699-710
3. Wexner S D., Beck D E., Baron T H., et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006 63 894-909
4. Sondheimer J M., Sokol R J., Taylor S F., et al. Safety, efficacy, and tolerance of intestinal lavage in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. J Pediatr 1991 119 148-152
5. Pinfield A, Stringer M D. Randomised trial of two pharmacological methods of bowel preparation for day case colonoscopy. Arch Dis Child 1999 80 181-183
6. Rasquin-Weber A, Hyman P E., Cucchiara S, et al. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut 1999 45 (Suppl. 2) II60-II68
7. Thompson W G., Longstreth G F., Drossman D A., et al. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999 45 (Suppl. 2) II43-II47
8. Salwen W A., Basson M D. Effect of four-day psyllium supplementation on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective double blind randomized trial [ISRCTN76623768]. BMC Gastroenterol 2004 4 2
9. Scott S R., Raymond P L., Thompson W O., Galt D J. Efficacy and tolerance of sodium phosphates oral solution after diet liberalization. Gastroenterol Nurs 2005 28 133-139
10. DiPalma J A., Wolff B G., Meagher A, Cleveland M. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 2187-2191
11. McRorie J, Zorich N, Riccardi K, et al. Effects of olestra and sorbitol consumption on objective measures of diarrhea: impact of stool viscosity on common gastrointestinal symptoms. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2000 31 59-67
12. Otley A, Smith C, Nicholas D, et al. The IMPACT questionnaire: a valid measure of health-related quality of life in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002 35 557-563
13. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointes Endosc 2004 59 482-486
14. Newcombe R G. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998 17 873-890
15. Bonett D G., Price R M. Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: Confidence intervals, hypothesis testing and sample size requirements. Psychol Methods 2002 7 370-383
16. Streiner D L. The case of the missing data: methods of dealing with dropouts and other research vagaries. Can J Psychiatr 2002 47 68-75
17. Hamilton D, Mulcahy D, Walsh D, et al. Sodium picosulphate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomised trial. Br J Clin Pract 1996 50 73-75
18. Regev A, Fraser G, Delpre G, et al. Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution. Am J Gastroenterol 1998 93 1478-1482
19. Dakkak M, Aziz K, Bennett J R. Short report: comparison of two orally administered bowel preparations for colonoscopy polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulphate. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1992 6 513-519
20. Schmidt L M., Williams P, King D, Perera D. Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations. Dis Colon Rectum 2004 47 238-242
21. Macleod A J., Duncan K A., Pearson R H., Bleakney R R. A comparison of Fleet Phospho-soda with Picolax in the preparation of the colon for double contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 1998 53 612-614
22. Yoshioka K, Connolly A B., Ogunbiyi O A., et al. Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Dig Surg 2000 17 66-70
23. Tjandra J J., Chan M, Tagkalidis P P. Oral sodium phosphate (Fleet) is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Picoprep (sodium picosulfate-based preparation). Dis Colon Rectum 2006 49 616-620
24. Hassall E, Lobe T E. Risky business: oral sodium phosphate for precolonoscopy bowel preparation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007 45 268-269 (Pubitemid 47220540)
25. Pockros P J., Foroozan P. Golytely lavage versus a standard colonoscopy preparation. Effect on normal colonic mucosal histology. Gastroenterology 1985 88 545-548
26. Rejchrt S, Bures J, Siroky M, et al. A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phosphate for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 59 651-654
27. Wong N A., Penman I D., Campbell S, Lessells A M. Microscopic focal cryptitis associated with sodium phosphate bowel preparation. Histopathology 2000 36 476-478
28. Hixson L J. Colorectal ulcers associated with sodium phosphate catharsis. Gastrointest Endosc 1995 42 101-102
29. Zwas F R., Cirillo N W., el-Serag H B., Eisen R N. Colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with oral sodium phosphate solution. Gastrointest Endosc 1996 43 463-466
30. Shaoul R, Haloon L. An assessment of bisacodyl-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Gastroenterol 2007 42 26-28 (Pubitemid 46351422)
31. Pashankar D S., Uc A, Bishop W P. Polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes: a new safe, effective, and palatable bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr 2004 144 358-362
32. Lawrance J A., Massoud T F., Creasy T S., et al. Colonic preparation with Picolax: patient tolerance and approaches to fluid replacement. Clin Radiol 1994 49 35-37
33. Barker P, Trotter T, Hanning C. A study of the effect of Picolax on body weight, cardiovascular variables and haemoglobin concentration. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1992 74 318-319
34. Burden R J., Way C F., Spargo P M. Picolax; an unusual cause of metabolic acidosis. Paediatr Anaesth 1998 8 365
35. Sanders G, Mercer S J., Saeb-Parsey K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of intravenous fluid replacement during bowel preparation for surgery. Br J Surg 2001 88 1363-1365
36. Saunders B P., Masaki T, Fukumoto M, et al. The quest for a more acceptable bowel preparation: comparison of a polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution and a mannitol/Picolax mixture for colonoscopy. Postgrad Med J 1995 71 476-479
37. Ryan F, Anobile T, Scutt D, et al. Effects of oral sodium picosulphate Picolax on urea and electrolytes. Nurs Stand 2005 19 41-45
38. Willan A R. Incremental net benefit in the analysis of economic data from clinical trials, with application to the CADET-Hp trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004 16 543-549
39. Doshi J A., Glick H A., Polsky D. Analyses of cost data in economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials. Value Health 2006 9 334-340