Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 142-150

  Hassan, C ^a   Bretthauer, M ^b   Kaminski, M F ^c   Polkowski, M ^c   Rembacken, B ^d   Saunders, B ^e   Benamouzig, R ^f   Holme, O ^g   Green, S ^e   Kuiper, T ^h   Marmo, R ⁱ   Omar, M ^j   Petruzziello, L ^a   Spada, C ^a   Zullo, A ^k   Dumonceau, J M ^l  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Poland)

^d LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^e ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f AVICENNE HOSPITAL   (France)

^g Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand   (Norway)

^h ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

ⁱ Hospital L Curto   (Italy)

^j New Mowasat Hospital   (Kuwait)

^k NUOVO REGINA MARGHERITA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^l GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

bowel preparation; colonoscopy; diet, colorectal cancer screening; inflammatory bowel disease; magnesium citrate; PEG; sodium phosphate; sodium picosulphate

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; CISAPRIDE; DOMPERIDONE; ITOPRIDE; MACROGOL; MAGNESIUM CITRATE; METOCLOPRAMIDE; MOSAPRIDE; PICOSULFATE SODIUM; SIMETHICONE; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; TEGASEROD;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; BLOATING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DRUG TOLERABILITY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIGH FIBER DIET; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; NAUSEA; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VOMITING;

CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; LAXATIVES;

EID: 84873411665     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186     Document Type: Review

References (132)

1. Stock C., Brenner H. Utilization of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and fecal occult blood test in 11 European countries: evidence from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Endoscopy: 2010; 42 546 556
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality - United States, 2002-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep: 2011; 60 884 890
3. Harewood G. C., Sharma V. K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc: 2003; 58 76 79
4. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J-J et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc: 2005; 61 378 384
5. Rex D. K., Imperiale T. F., Latinovich D. R. et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2002; 97 1696 1700
6. Senore C., Ederle A., Fantin A. et al. Acceptability and side-effects of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in a screening setting. J Med Screen: 2011; 18 128 134
7. Atkins D., Best D., Briss P. A. et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ: 2004; 328 1490
8. Dumonceau J-M, Hassan C., Riphaus A. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline Development Policy. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 626 629
9. Wu K-L, Rayner C. K., Chuah S-K et al. Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum: 2011; 54 107 112
10. Adams W. J., Meagher A. P., Lubowski D. Z. et al. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum: 1994; 37 229 233 discussion 233-224
11. Aoun E., Abdul-Baki H., Azar C. et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc: 2005; 62 213 218
12. Soweid A. M., Kobeissy A. A., Jamali F. R. et al. A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Endoscopy: 2010; 42 633 638
13. Park D. I., Park S. H., Lee S. K. et al. Efficacy of prepackaged, low residual test meals with 4L polyethylene glycol versus a clear liquid diet with 4L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation: a randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2009; 24 988 991
14. Lever E. L., Walter M. H., Condon S. C. et al. Addition of enemas to oral lavage preparation for colonoscopy is not necessary. Gastrointest Endosc: 1992; 38 369 372
15. Borkje B., Pedersen R., Lund G. M. et al. Effectiveness and acceptability of three bowel cleansing regimens. Scand J Gastroenterol: 1991; 26 162 166
16. Golub R. W., Kerner B. A., Wise W. E. et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations - which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum: 1995; 38 594 599
17. Tasci I., Altinli E., Sirin F. Bowel cleansing for diagnostic colonoscopy: which method is preferable? Istanbul experience. Tech Coloproctol: 2003; 7 18 21
18. Martínek J., Hess J., Delarive J. et al. Cisapride does not improve precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage. Gastrointest Endosc: 2001; 54 180 185
19. Katsinelos P., Pilpilidis I., Paroutoglou G. et al. The administration of cisapride as an adjuvant to PEG-electrolyte solution for colonic cleansing: a double-blind randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology: 2005; 52 441 443
20. Sanaka M. R., Super D. M., Mullen K. D. et al. Use of tegaserod along with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2006; 23 669 674
21. Mishima Y., Amano Y., Okita K. et al. Efficacy of prokinetic agents in improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Digestion: 2008; 77 166 172
22. Tongprasert S., Sobhonslidsuk A., Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol: 2009; 15 3032 3037
23. Shaver W. A., Storms P., Peterson W. L. Improvement of oral colonic lavage with supplemental simethicone. Dig Dis Sci: 1988; 33 185 188
24. Wu L., Cao Y., Liao C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Simethicone for gastrointestinal endoscopic visibility. Scand J Gastroenterol: 2011; 46 227 235
25. Altintaş E., Uçbilek E., Sezgin O. et al. Alverine citrate plus simethicone reduces cecal intubation time in colonoscopy - a randomized study. Turk J Gastroenterol: 2008; 19 174 179
26. Lazzaroni M., Petrillo M., Desideri S. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution with and without simethicone in the preparation of patients with inflammatory bowel disease for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 1993; 7 655 659
27. McNally P. R., Maydonovitch C. L., Wong R. K. The effect of simethicone on colonic visibility after night-prior colonic lavage. A double-blind randomized study. J Clin Gastroenterol: 1989; 11 650 652
28. McNally P. R., Maydonovitch C. L., Wong R. K. The effectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc: 1988; 34 255 258
29. Sudduth R. H., DeAngelis S., Sherman K. E. et al. The effectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy when given with a sodium phosphate solution: a double-bind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc: 1995; 42 413 415
30. Belsey J., Epstein O., Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2007; 25 373 384
31. Hsu C. W., Imperiale T. F. Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc: 1998; 48 276 282
32. Juluri R., Eckert G., Imperiale T. F. Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterology: 2011; 11 38
33. Juluri R., Eckert G., Imperiale T. F. Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2010; 32 171 181
34. Tan J. JY, Tjandra J. J. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis: 2006; 8 247 258
35. Belsey J., Crosta C., Epstein O. et al. Meta-analysis: the relative efficacy of oral bowel preparations for colonoscopy 1985-2010. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2012; 35 222 237
36. Lawrance I. C., Willert R. P., Murray K. Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents. Endoscopy: 2011; 43 412 418 Epub 2011 May 4
37. Renaut A. J., Raniga S., Frizelle F. A. et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and acceptability of phospo-soda buffered saline (Fleet®) with sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (Picoprep®) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis: 2008; 10 503 505
38. Worthington J., Thyssen M., Chapman G. et al. A randomised controlled trial of a new 2 litre polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate + magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin: 2008; 24 481 488
39. Tjandra J. J., Chan M., Tagkalidis P. P. Oral sodium phosphate (Fleet) is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Picopre (sodium picosulfate-based preparation). Dis Colon Rectum: 2006; 49 616 620
40. Schmidt L-M, Williams P., King D. et al. Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations. Dis Colon Rectum: 2004; 47 238 242
41. Berkelhammer C., Ekambaram A., Silva R. G. et al. Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate. Gastrointest Endosc: 2002; 56 89 94
42. Regev A., Fraser G., Delpre G. et al. Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution. Am J Gastroenterol: 1998; 93 1478 1482
43. Hamilton D., Mulcahy D., Walsh D. et al. Sodium picosulphate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomised trial. Br J Clin Pract: 1996; 50 73 75
44. Park S. S., Sinn D. H., Kim Y-H et al. Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 1319 1326
45. Sharma V. K., Chockalingham S. K., Ugheoke E. A. et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc: 1998; 47 167 171
46. Jansen S. V., Goedhard J. G., Winkens B. et al. Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2011; 23 897 902
47. Pontone S. Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol: 2011; 17 4689 4695
48. Corporaal S., Kleibeuker J. H., Koornstra J. J. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol: 2010; 45 1380 1386
49. Marmo R., Rotondano G., Riccio G. et al. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 72 313 320
50. Ell C., Fischbach W., Bronisch H-J et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2008; 103 883 893
51. Singh H., Turner D., Xue L. et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA: 2006; 295 2366 2373
52. Baxter N. N., Goldwasser M. A., Paszat L. F. et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med: 2009; 150 1 8
53. Abut E., Guveli H., Yasar B. et al. Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 70 515 521
54. Haapamäki M. M., Lindström M., Sandzén B. Low-volume bowel preparation is inferior to standard 4 1 polyethylene glycol. Surg Endosc: 2011; 25 897 901
55. Enestvedt B. K., Fennerty M. B., Eisen G. M. Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2011; 33 33 40
56. Hookey L. C., Depew W. T., Vanner S. J. Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol: 2006; 20 101 105
57. DiPalma J. A., Mcgowan J., Cleveland M. V. Clinical trial: an efficacy evaluation of reduced bisacodyl given as part of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution preparation prior to colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2007; 26 1113 1119
58. Kilgore T. W., Abdinoor A. A., Szary N. M. et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 1240 1245
59. Parra-Blanco A., Nicolas-Perez D., Gimeno-Garcia A. et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol: 2006; 12 6161 6166
60. Church J. M. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum: 1998; 41 1223 1225
61. Varughese S., Kumar A. R., George A. et al. Morning-only one-gallon polyethylene glycol improves bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopies: a randomized endoscopist-blinded prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 2368 2374
62. Matro R., Shnitser A., Spodik M. et al. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 1954 1961
63. Longcroft-Wheaton G., Bhandari P. Same-day bowel cleansing regimen is superior to a split-dose regimen over 2 days for afternoon colonoscopy: results from a large prospective series. J Clin Gastroenterol: 2012; 46 57 61
64. Eun C. S., Han D. S., Hyun Y. S. et al. The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing. Dig Dis Sci: 2011; 56 539 544
65. Siddiqui A. A., Yang K., Spechler S. J. et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 700 706
66. Huffman M., Unger R. Z., Thatikonda C. et al. Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 72 516 522
67. Khan M. A., Piotrowski Z., Brown M. D. Patient acceptance, convenience, and efficacy of single-dose versus split-dose colonoscopy bowel preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol: 2010; 44 310 311
68. Unger R. Z., Amstutz S. P., Seo D. H. et al. Willingness to undergo split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and compliance with split-dose instructions. Dig Dis Sci: 2010; 55 2030 2034
69. Park J. S., Sohn C. I., Hwang S. J. et al. Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 616 619
70. Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology: 2011; 114 495 511
71. Vradelis S., Kalaitzakis E., Sharifi Y. et al. Addition of senna improves quality of colonoscopy preparation with magnesium citrate. World J Gastroenterol: 2009; 15 1759 1763
72. Ziegenhagen D. J., Zehnter E., Tacke W. et al. Addition of senna improves colonoscopy preparation with lavage: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc: 1991; 37 547 549
73. Ziegenhagen D. J., Zehnter E., Tacke W. et al. Senna vs. bisacodyl in addition to Golytely lavage for colonoscopy preparation - a prospective randomized trial. Z Gastroenterol: 1992; 30 17 19
74. Amato A., Radaelli F., Paggi S. et al. Half doses of PEG-ES and senna vs. high-dose senna for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 675 681
75. Radaelli F., Meucci G., Imperiali G. et al. High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Am J Gastroenterol: 2005; 100 2674 2680
76. Unal S., Doan U. B., Oztürk Z. et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Acta Gastroenterol Belg: 1998; 61 281 284
77. Kositchaiwat S., Suwanthanmma W., Suvikapakornkul R. et al. Comparative study of two bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy: senna tablets vs sodium phosphate solution. World J Gastroenterol: 2006; 12 5536 5539
78. Hangartner P. J., Münch R., Meier J. et al. Comparison of three colon cleansing methods: evaluation of a randomized clinical trial with 300 ambulatory patients. Endoscopy: 1989; 21 272 275
79. Chen T-A, Wong H-Y, Lin C-K et al. High-dose bisacodyl plus water lavage compared with oral sodium phosphate as bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy. J Chin Med Assoc: 2009; 72 402 407
80. Rasmussen M., Bohlbro K., Qvist N. Oral sodium phosphate compared with water enemas combined with bisacodyl as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol: 2003; 38 1090 1094
81. Wang H-S, Lin J-K. A randomized prospective trial of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with Fortrans compared with bisacodyl. J Chin Med Assoc: 2003; 66 364 369
82. Chacaltana Mendoza A., Rodríguez Ulloa C. [Comparative study between manitol 10% and polyethyleneglycol [corrected] in colonoscopic preparation in inpatients of FAP Central Hospital]. Rev Gastroenterol Peru: 2008; 28 125 132
83. Habr-Gama A., Bringel R. W., Nahas S. C. et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: comparison of mannitol and sodium phosphate. Results of a prospective randomized study. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo: 1999; 54 187 192
84. Rey J. F., Beilenhoff U., Neumann C. S. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: the use of electrosurgical units. Endoscopy: 2010; 42 764 772
85. Markowitz G. S., Stokes M. B., Radhakrishnan J. et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol: 2005; 16 3389 3396
86. Brunelli S. M. Association between oral sodium phosphate bowel preparations and kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis: 2009; 53 448 456
87. Belsey J., Epstein O., Heresbach D. Systematic review: adverse event reports for oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2009; 29 15 28
88. Pálmadóttir V. K., Gudmundsson H., Hardarson S. et al. Incidence and outcome of acute phosphate nephropathy in Iceland. PLoS One: 2010; 5 e13484
89. Hookey L. C., Vanner S. Recognizing the clinical contraindications to the use of oral sodium phosphate for colon cleansing: a case study. Can J Gastroenterol: 2004; 18 455 458
90. Wexner S. D., Beck D. E., Baron T. H. et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 63 894 909
91. Balaban D. H. Guidelines for the safe and effective use of sodium phosphate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs: 2008; 31 327 334; quiz 334-325
92. Rex D. K., Vanner S. J. Colon cleansing before colonoscopy: does oral sodium phosphate solution still make sense? Can J Gastroenterol: 2009; 23 210 214
93. Marshall J. B., Pineda J. J., Barthel J. S. et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc: 1993; 39 631 634
94. Zhang Q-L, Rothenbacher D. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in population-based studies: systematic review. BMC Public Health: 2008; 8 117
95. Russmann S., Lamerato L., Marfatia A. et al. Risk of impaired renal function after colonoscopy: a cohort study in patients receiving either oral sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol. Am J Gastroenterol: 2007; 102 2655 2663
96. Markowitz G. S., Perazella M. A. Acute phosphate nephropathy. Kidney Int: 2009; 76 1027 1034
97. Law W-L, Choi H-K, Chu K-W et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyethylene glycol solution, one dose and two doses of oral sodium phosphate solution. Asian J Surg: 2004; 27 120 124
98. Malik P., Balaban D. H., Thompson W. O. et al. Randomized study comparing two regimens of oral sodium phosphates solution versus low-dose polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl. Dig Dis Sci: 2009; 54 833 841
99. Rex D. K., Schwartz H., Goldstein M. et al. Safety and colon-cleansing efficacy of a new residue-free formulation of sodium phosphate tablets. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 2594 2604
100. Wruble L., Demicco M., Medoff J. et al. Residue-free sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep) versus Visicol for colon cleansing: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Gastrointest Endosc: 2007; 65 660 670
101. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum: 1997; 40 100 104
102. Hassan C., Fuccio L., Bruno M. et al. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2012; 10 501 506
103. Chan W. K., Saravanan A., Manikam J. et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol: 2011; 11 86
104. Tae J. W., Lee J. C., Hong S. J. et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 76 804 11
105. Spiegel B. M., Talley J., Shekelle P. et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol: 2011; 106 875 883
106. Borg B. B., Gupta N. K., Zuckerman G. R. et al. Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2009; 7 670 675
107. Chan W-K, Saravanan A., Manikam J. et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol: 2011; 11 86
108. Chung Y. W., Han D. S., Park K. H. et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol: 2009; 43 448 452
109. Lebwohl B., Wang T. C., Neugut A. I. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci: 2010; 55 2014 2020
110. Ness R. M., Manam R., Hoen H. et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2001; 96 1797 1802
111. Ben-Horin S., Bar-Meir S., Avidan B. The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 626 630
112. Ibáñez M., Parra-Blanco A., Zaballa P. et al. Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure. Dis Colon Rectum: 2011; 54 1578 1584
113. Lieberman D., Nadel M., Smith R. A. et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc: 2007; 65 757 766
114. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., Cahen D. L. et al. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 75 98 106
115. Rigaux J., Juriens I., Devière J. A novel system for the improvement of colonic cleansing during colonoscopy. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 703 706
116. Cappell M. S., Colon V. J., Sidhom O. A. A study at 10 medical centers of the safety and efficacy of 48 flexible sigmoidoscopies and 8 colonoscopies during pregnancy with follow-up of fetal outcome and with comparison to control groups. Dig Dis Sci: 1996; 41 2353 2361
117. Cappell M. S., Fox S. R., Gorrepati N. Safety and efficacy of colonoscopy during pregnancy: an analysis of pregnancy outcome in 20 patients. J Reprod Med: 2010; 55 115 123
118. Briggs G. G., Freeman R. K., Yaffe S. J. Drugs in pregnancy and lactation: a reference guide to fetal and neonatal risk. 9th edn. Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2011
119. Nardulli G., Limongi F., Sue G. et al. [Use of polyethylene glycol in the treatment of puerperal constipation]. GEN: 1995; 49 224 226
120. Vinod J., Bonheur J., Korelitz B. I. et al. Choice of laxatives and colonoscopic preparation in pregnant patients from the viewpoint of obstetricians and gastroenterologists. World J Gastroenterol: 2007; 13 6549 6552
121. Atkinson R. J., Save V., Hunter J. O. Colonic ulceration after sodium phosphate bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol: 2005; 100 2603 2605
122. Rejchrt S., Bures J., Sirok M. et al. A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phosphate for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2004; 59 651 654
123. Coskun A., Uzunkoy A., Duzgun S. A. et al. Experimental sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol induce colonic tissue damage and oxidative stress. Br J Surg: 2001; 88 85 89
124. Erdogan B., Isiksoy S., Dundar E. et al. The effects of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte bowel preparation solutions on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced colitis in the rat. Exp Toxicol Pathol: 2003; 55 213 220
125. Colacchio T. A., Forde K. A., Patsos T. J. et al. Impact of modern diagnostic methods on the management of active rectal bleeding. Ten year experience. Am J Surg: 1982; 143 607 610
126. Das A., Ben-Menachem T., Cooper G. S. et al. Prediction of outcome in acute lower-gastrointestinal haemorrhage based on an artificial neural network: internal and external validation of a predictive model. Lancet: 2003; 362 1261 1266
127. Green B. T., Rockey D. C., Portwood G. et al. Urgent colonoscopy for evaluation and management of acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol: 2005; 100 2395 2402
128. Jensen D. M., Machicado G. A., Jutabha R. et al. Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular hemorrhage. N Engl J Med: 2000; 342 78 82
129. Jensen D. M., Machicado G. A. Diagnosis and treatment of severe hematochezia. The role of urgent colonoscopy after purge. Gastroenterology: 1988; 95 1569 1574
130. Laine L., Shah A. Randomized trial of urgent vs. elective colonoscopy in patients hospitalized with lower GI bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 2636 2641 quiz 2642
131. Lanas A., García-Rodríguez L. A., Polo-Tomás M. et al. Time trends and impact of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol: 2009; 104 1633 1641
132. Saito K., Inamori M., Sekino Y. et al. Management of acute lower intestinal bleeding: what bowel preparation should be required for urgent colonoscopy? Hepatocastroenterology: 2009; 56 1331 1334