Morning-only one-gallon polyethylene glycol improves bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopies: A randomized endoscopist-blinded prospective study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2368-2374

  Varughese, Shibu ^a   Kumar, Anand R ^b   George, Amy ^a   Castro, Fernando J ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL;

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENING DOSAGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORNING DOSAGE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; AGED; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78149283321     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.271     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics. 1999-2005 Incidence and Mortality Web-Based Report. US Department ofHealth and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Preventionand National Cancer Institute: Atlanta , 2009.
2. Lieberman DA , Weiss DG , Bond JH et al. Use of colonoscopy to screenasymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Aff airs CooperativeStudy Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000 ; 343 : 162-8.
3. Mostafa G , Matthews BD , Norton HJ et al. influence of demographics oncolorectal cancer. Am Surg 2004 ; 70 : 259-64.
4. Winawer SJ , Zauber AG , Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer bycolonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N EnglJ Med 1993 ; 329 : 1977-81.
5. Anderson JC , Gonzalez JD , Messina CR et al. Factors that predict incompletecolonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 2000 ; 95 : 2784-7.
6. Bernstein C , Th orn M , Monsees K et al. A prospective study of factorsthat determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc2005 ; 61 : 72-5.
7. Chak A , Cooper GS , Blades EW et al. Prospective assessment of colonoscopicintubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 1996 ; 44 : 54-7.
8. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavagebowel preparation for colonoscopy-timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum1998 ; 41 : 1223-5.
9. Cirocco WC , Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. DisColon Rectum 1995 ; 38 : 964-8.
10. Dafnis G , Granath F , Pahlman L et al. Patient factors influencing thecompletion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2005 ; 37 : 113-8.
11. Harewood GC. Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopistfeatures. Dig Dis Sci 2005 ; 50 : 47-51.
12. Kim WH , Cho YJ , Park JY et al. Factors aff ecting insertion time and patientdiscomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 ; 52 : 600-5.
13. Mathus-Vliegen EM , Kemble UM. A prospective randomized blinded comparisonof sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solutionfor safe bowel cleansing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006 ; 23 : 543-52.
14. Saunders BP , Fukumoto M , Halligan S et al. Why is colonoscopy moredifficult in women? Gastrointest Endosc 1996 ; 43 (2 Pt 1) : 124-6.
15. Stengel JZ , Jones DP. Single-dose lubiprostone along with split-dose PEGsolution without dietary restrictions for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy:a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol2008 ; 103 : 2224-30.
16. Waye JD , Bashkoff E. Total colonoscopy: is it always possible? GastrointestEndosc 1991 ; 37 : 152-4.
17. Webb WA. Colonoscoping the " difficult " colon. Am Surg 1991 ; 57 : 178-82.
18. Hendry PO , Jenkins JT , Diament RH. The impact of poor bowel preparationon colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies.Colorectal Dis 2007 ; 9 : 745-8.
19. Sanaka MR , Shah N , Mullen KD et al. Aft ernoon colonoscopies have higherfailure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 ; 101 : 2726-30.
20. Froehlich F , Wietlisbach V , Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansingon quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel ofAppropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc 2005 ; 61 : 378-84.
21. Harewood GC , Sharma VK , de GP. Impact of colonoscopy preparation qualityon detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 ; 58 : 76-9.
22. Th omas-Gibson S , Rogers P , Cooper S et al. Judgement of the quality ofbowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated withvariability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 2006 ; 38 : 456-60.
23. Cohen LB , Tennyson C. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: maximizingefficacy, minimizing risk. Gastroenterol Endosc News 2007 ; 5 (SpecialEdition) : 23-31.
24. Ness RM , Manam R , Hoen H et al. Predictors of inadequate bowelpreparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 ; 96 : 1797-802.
25. El Sayed AM , Kanafani ZA , Mourad FH et al. A randomized single-blindtrial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution forcolonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 ; 58 : 36-40.
26. Parra-Blanco A , Nicolas-Perez D , Gimeno-Garcia A et al. The timing ofbowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing,and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: arandomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006 ; 12 : 6161-6.
27. Gupta T , Mandot A , Desai D et al. Comparison of two schedules (previousevening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.Endoscopy 2007 ; 39 : 706-9.
28. Chiu HM , Lin JT , Wang HP et al. The impact of colon preparation timingon colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms-a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 ; 101 : 2719-25.
29. Rostom A , Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment ofbowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 ; 59 : 482-6.
30. Borg BB , Gupta NK , Zuckerman GR et al. Impact of obesity on bowelpreparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 ; 7 : 670-5.
31. Aoun E , Abdul-Baki H , Azar C et al. A randomized single-blind trial ofsplit-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction comparedwith whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction forcolonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 ; 62 : 213-8.
32. Rex DK , Johnson DA , Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroenterologyguidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].Am J Gastroenterol 2009 ; 104 : 739-50.