Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: The importance of health literacy

Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 369-372

  Nguyen, Douglas L ^a   Wieland, Mark ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon cancer; Poor preparation; Screening colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

MOVIPREP; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; MEDICAID; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREDICTION; PRESCRIPTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; AMBULATORY CARE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH LITERACY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY CARE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONOSCOPY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 79955651013     PISSN: 18418724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 5-26.
2. Winawer S J, Zauber a G, O'Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 901-906.
3. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J J, Burnand B, Vader J P. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378-384.
4. Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, Spell R, O'Connor J B. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 72-75.
5. Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH, et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 448-452.
6. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1797-1802.
7. Lebwohl B, Wang TC, Neugut AI. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2014-2020.
8. Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, Coffin B, Dugue C, Halphen M; Norcol Group. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 1631-1642.
9. Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Weiss A, Boaz M, Levin I, Chervinski A, Shemesh E. Predictors of failed colonoscopy in nonagenarians: a single-center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 388-393.
10. Taylor C, Schubert ML. Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution (golytely) in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:710-714.