A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation

Endoscopy

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 633-638

  Soweid, A M ^a   Kobeissy, A A ^a   Jamali, F R ^a   El Tarchichi, M ^a   Skoury, A ^a   Abdul Baki, H ^a   El Zahabi, L ^a   El Sayyed, A ^a   Barada, K A ^a   Sharara, A I ^a   Mourad, F ^a   Arabi, A ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROLYTE; MACROGOL; LAXATIVE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; FEMALE; FIBER FREE DIET; FLUID INTAKE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOMITING; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIETARY FIBER; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; ELECTROLYTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955138383     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244236     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Harewood G C., Sharma V K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 76-79
2. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J J. et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 378-384
3. Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S et al. Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 2006 38 456-460
4. Rex D K., Imperiale T F., Latinovich D R. et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 1696-1700
5. Davis G R., Santa Ana C A., Morawski S G. et al. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980 78 (5 Pt 1) 991-995
6. Ainley E J., Winwood P J., Begley J P. Measurement of serum electrolytes and phosphate after sodium phosphate colonoscopy bowel preparation: an evaluation. Dig Dis Sci 2005 50 1319-1323
7. Hsu C W., Imperiale T F. Metaanalysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 48 276-282
8. Van Gorkom B A., Karrenbeld A, Limburg A J. et al. The effect of sennosides on colonic mucosal histology and bowel preparation. Z Gastroenterol 1998 36 13-18
9. Hookey L C., Depew W T., Vanner S J. A prospective randomized trial comparing low-dose oral sodium phosphate plus stimulant laxatives with large volume polyethylene glycol solution for colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 2217-2222
10. Jayanthi V, Ramathilakam B, Malathi S et al. Comparison of polyethylene glycol versus combination of magnesium sulphate and bisacodyl for colon preparation. Trop Gastroenterol 2000 21 18-19
11. Sharma V K., Chockalingham S K., Ugheoke E A. et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 47 167-171
12. Ginzberg L, Greenwald D. Risks of preparation for endoscopy. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2007 9 205-207
13. Toledo T K., DiPalma J A. Review article: colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001 15 605-611
14. Hwang K L., Chen W T., Hsiao K H. et al. Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2005 11 7486-7493
15. Katsinelos P, Pilpilidis I, Paroutoglou G et al. The administration of cisapride as an adjuvant to PEG-electrolyte solution for colonic cleansing: a double-blind randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 2005 52 441-443
16. DiPalma J A., Wolff B G., Meagher A et al. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 2187-2191
17. Hayes A, Buffum M, Fuller D. Bowel preparation comparison: flavored versus unflavored colyte. Gastroenterol Nurs 2003 26 106-109
18. Sharma V K., Chockalingham S K., Ugheoke E A. et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 47 167-171
19. Raymer G S., Hartman D E., Rowe W A. et al. An open-label trial of L-glucose as a colon-cleansing agent before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 30-35
20. El Sayed A M., Kanafani Z A., Mourad F H. et al. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 36-40
21. Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 62 213-218
22. Rapier R, Houston C. A prospective study to assess the efficacy and patient tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs 2006 29 305-308
23. Delegge M, Kaplan R. Efficacy of bowel preparation with the use of a prepackaged, low fibre diet with low sodium, magnesium citrate cathartic vs. a clear liquid diet with a standard sodium phosphate cathartic. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005 21 1491-1495
24. Scott S R., Raymond P L., Thompson W O. et al. Efficacy and tolerance of sodium phosphates oral solution after diet liberalization. Gastroenterol Nurs 2005 28 133-139
25. Hale W E., Perkins L L., May F E. et al. Symptom prevalence in the elderly. An evaluation of age, sex, disease, and medication use. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986 34 333-340
26. Taylor C, Schubert M L. Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study. Am J Gastroenterology 2001 96 710-714
27. Church J M. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum 1998 41 1223-1225
28. Siddiqui A, Yang K, Spechler S J. et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2009 69 700-706