4-Liter Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Is Superior to Other Bowel Preparations, Based on Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1225-1231

  Enestvedt, Brintha K ^a   Tofani, Christina ^a   Laine, Loren A ^b   Tierney, Ann ^a   Fennerty, M Brian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Colorectal cancer screening; Diagnostic accuracy; Visualization

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL;

ABDOMINAL CRAMP; BLOATING; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLONOSCOPY; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; NAUSEA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REVIEW; SLEEP DISORDER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CATHARTICS; HUMANS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867678327     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.08.029     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Zauber A.G., Winawer S.J., O'Brien M.J., et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012, 366:687-696.
2. Quintero E., Castells A., Bujanda L., et al. Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2012, 366:697-706.
3. Chokshi R.V., Hovis C.E., Hollander T., et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:1197-1203.
4. Lebwohl B., Kastrinos F., Glick M., et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1207-1214.
5. Harewood G.C., Sharma V.K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 58:76-79.
6. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J.J., et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:378-384.
7. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:W65-W94.
8. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996, 17:1-12.
9. Abdul-Baki H., Hashash J.G., Elhajj I.I., et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of Tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 68:294-300. quiz, 334, 336.
10. Aoun E., Abdul-Baki H., Azar C., et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:213-218.
11. Corporaal S., Kleibeuker J.H., Koornstra J.J. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010, 45:1380-1386.
12. Ell C., Fischbach W., Bronisch H.J., et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:883-893.
13. Ell C., Fischbach W., Keller R., et al. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01). Endoscopy 2003, 35:300-304.
14. Enestvedt B.K., Fennerty M.B., Eisen G.M. Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011, 33:33-40.
15. Hjelkrem M., Stengel J., Liu M., et al. MiraLAX is not as effective as GoLytely in bowel cleansing before screening colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 9:326-332.e1.
16. Marmo R., Rotondano G., Riccio G., et al. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 72:313-320.
17. Park S.S., Sinn D.H., Kim Y.H., et al. Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1319-1326.
18. Kilgore T.W., Abdinoor A.A., Szary N.M., et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1240-1245.
19. Park J.S., Sohn C.I., Hwang S.J., et al. Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007, 39:616-619.
20. Seo E.H., Kim T.O., Kim T.G., et al. Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose PEG compared with split-dose aqueous sodium phosphate for outpatient colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci 2011, 56:2963-2971.
21. Rex D.K., Johnson D.A., Anderson J.C., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:739-750.
22. Lai E.J., Calderwood A.H., Doros G., et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:620-625.
23. Moher D., Pham B., Lawson M.L., et al. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess 2003, 7:1-90.