Randomized study comparing two regimens of oral sodium phosphates solution versus low-dose polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 833-841

  Malik, Pramod ^a   Balaban, David H ^b   Thompson, William O ^c   Galt, Deborah J B ^d  

^a Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater PC   (United States)

^b Charlottesville Gastroenterology Associates   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d CB Fleet Company Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol; Sodium phosphates

Indexed keywords

BISACODYL; EZ PREP; HALFLYTELY; MACROGOL; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; LAXATIVE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; PHOSPHATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANUS INJURY; ARTICLE; BLOATING; CHILL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG INDUCED HEADACHE; DRUG TOLERABILITY; EVENING DOSAGE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HUMAN; HUNGER; INDIGESTION; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LOW DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORNING DOSAGE; MUSCLE CRAMP; NAUSEA; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIDE EFFECT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; THIRST; VOMITING; WEAKNESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BISACODYL; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHOSPHATES; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63249117700     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0420-x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Cancer Society (2008) Cancer facts and figures 2008. American
2. American Cancer Society (2006) Cancer facts and figures 2006. AmericanCancer Society, Atlanta. Available at:http://www.cancer.org/downloads/ STT/CAFF2007PWSecured.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2007
3. S Winawer A Zauber M Ho M O'Brien L Gottlieb S Sternberg 1993 Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup N Engl J Med 329 1977 1981 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701
4. DF Ransohoff 2005 Have we oversold colonoscopy? Gastroenterology 129 1815 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.032
5. TF Imperiale DF Ransohoff SH Itzkowitz BA Turnbull ME Ross 2004 Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population N Engl J Med 351 2704 2714 10.1056/NEJMoa033403
6. CW Ko JA Dominitz TD Nguyen 2003 Fecal occult blood testing in a general medical clinic: comparison between guaiac-based and immunochemical-based tests Am J Med 115 111 114 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00294-8
7. JK Habermann VJ Roblick BT Luke DA Prieto WJ Finlay VN Podust 2006 Increased serum levels of complement C3a anaphylatoxin indicate the presence of colorectal tumors Gastroenterology 131 1020 1029 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.07.011
8. RM Summers AK Jerebko M Franaszek JD Malley CD Johnson 2005 Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population Gastroenterology 129 1832 1844 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.054
9. GC Harewood MJ Wiersema LJ Melton 3rd 2002 A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 97 3186 3194 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07129.x
10. SL Ristvedt EG [tmp] McFarland LB Weinstock E Thyssen 2003 Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation Am J Gastroenterol 98 578 585 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07302.x
11. CW Ko S Riffle JA Shapiro MD Saunders SD Lee BY Tung 2007 Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 67 648 656 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06. 020
12. D Rex T Imperiale D Latinovich L Bratcher 2002 Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 97 1696 1700 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x
13. S Vanner P [tmp] MacDonald W Paterson R Prentice L Da Costa I Beck 1990 A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 85 422 427
14. D Balaban B Leavell M Oblinger W Thompson N Bolton D Pambianco 2003 Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate Am J Gastroenterol 98 827 832 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x
15. W Clarkston T Tsen D Dies C Schratz S Vaswani P Bjerregaard 1996 Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective comparison Gastrointest Endosc 43 42 48
16. S Cohen S Wexner S Binderow J Nogueras N Daniel E Ehrenpreis 1994 Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods Dis Colon Rectum 37 689 696 10.1007/BF02054413
17. B Kolts W Lyles S Achem L Burton A Geller T [tmp] MacMath 1993 A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation Am J Gastroenterol 88 1218 1223
18. J Marshall J Pineda J Barthel P King 1993 Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation Gastrointest Endosc 39 631 634
19. CJ Young RR Simpson DW King DZ Lubowski 2000 Oral sodium phosphate solution is a superior colonoscopy preparation to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl Dis Colon Rectum 43 1568 1571 10.1007/BF02236740
20. SR Scott PL Raymond WO Thompson DJB Galt 2005 Efficacy and tolerance of sodium phosphates oral solution after diet liberalization Gastroenterol Nurs 28 133 139 10.1097/00001610-200503000-00008
21. M Caswell WO Thompson JA Kanapka DJB Galt 2007 The time course and effect on serum electrolytes of oral sodium phosphates solution in healthy male and female volunteers Can J Clin Pharmacol 14 3 e260 e274
22. Food and Drug Administration (2004) CDER drug and biologic approvals for calendar year. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/rdmt/ndaaps04cy.htm. Accessed 23 Oct 2006
23. W Hale L Perkins F May R Marks R Stewart 1986 Symptom prevalence in the elderly. An evaluation of age, sex, disease, and medication use J Am Geriatr Soc 34 333 340
24. C.B. Fleet Co. Inc. (2006) Physicians' desk reference, 60th edn. Thomson PDR, Montvale, NJ
25. V Sharma S Chockalingham E Ugheoke A Kapur P Ling R Vasudeva 1998 Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation Gastrointest Endosc 47 167 171 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70351-7
26. W Adams A Meagher D Lubowski D King 1994 Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation Dis Colon Rectum 37 229 234 10.1007/BF02048160
27. J DiPalma B Wolff A Meagher M Cleveland 2003 Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing Am J Gastroenterol 98 2187 2191 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07690.x
28. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Label and Approval History, HalfLytely (NDA) 021551. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington D.C. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2007/021551s006lbl.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2008
29. C Poon D Lee S Mak C Ko KC Chan KW Chan 2002 Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial Endoscopy 34 560 563 10.1055/s-2002-33207
30. S Mouly I Mahe AL Knellwolf G Simoneau JF Bergmann 2005 Effects of the addition of high-dose vitamin C to polyethylene glycol solution for colonic cleansing: a pilot study in healthy volunteers Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 66 486 500 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.12.002
31. DK Rex H Schwartz M Goldstein J Popp S Katz C Barish 2006 Safety and colon-cleansing efficacy of a new residue-free formulation of sodium phosphate tablets Am J Gastroenterol 101 2594 2604
32. JF Johanson JW Popp LB Cohen SR Lottes WP Forbes K Walker 2007 A randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets with 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for colon cleansing Am J Gastroenterol 102 1 9 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01057.x
33. R Ness R Manam H Hoen N Chalasani 2001 Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 96 1797 1802 10.1111/j.1572-0241. 2001.03874.x
34. GS Markowitz MB Stokes J Radhakrishnan VD D'Agati 2005 Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure J Am Soc Nephrol 16 3389 3396 10.1681/ASN.2005050496
35. S Russmann L Lamerato A Marfatia SP Motsko JC Pezzullo G Olds 2007 Risk of impaired renal function after colonoscopy: a cohort study in patients receiving either oral sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol Am J Gastroenterol 102 2655 2663 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01610.x
36. AK Singal AS Rosman JB Post WA Bauman AM Spungen MA Korsten 2007 The renal safety of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: a comparative study of oral sodium phosphate solution and polyethylene glycol Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27 41 47
37. SM Brunelli JD Lewis M Gupta SM Latif MG Weiner HI Feldman 2007 Risk of kidney injury following oral phosphosoda bowel preparations J Am Soc Nephrol 18 3199 3205 10.1681/ASN.2007040440
38. FP Hurst EM Bohen EM Osgard DK Oliver NP Das SW Gao 2007 Association of oral sodium phosphate purgative use with acute kidney injury J Am Soc Nephrol 18 3192 3198 10.1681/ASN.2007030349