Assessment of patients' perceptions of bowel preparation quality at colonoscopy

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 839-843

  Harewood, Gavin C ^a   Wright, Curtis A ^a   Baron, Todd H ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLYTELY; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; LAXATIVE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGE; AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GENDER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SCHEDULING; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDUAL STOOL SCORE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVALUATION; LAVAGE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

AGED; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRRIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2942675197     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04176.x     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365-71.
2. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472-7.
3. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996;348:1467-71.
4. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, et al. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;326:653-7.
5. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, et al. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:1572-5.
6. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000;343:162-8.
7. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000;343:169-74.
8. Harewood G, Sharma VK, deGarmo PG. Impact of colonoscopy bowel preparation quality on colonic lesion detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76-9.
9. Prajapati DN, Saeian K, Binion DG, et al. Volume and yield of screening colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center after change in medicare reimbursement. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:194-9.
10. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797-802.
11. Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85:422-7.
12. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1218-23.
13. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631-4.
14. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689-96.
15. Afridi SA, Barthel JS, King PD, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:485-9.
16. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE Jr, et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations: Which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:594-9.
17. Henderson JM, Barnett JL, Turgeon DK, et al. Single-day, divided-dose oral sodium phosphate laxative versus intestinal lavage as preparation for colonoscopy: Efficacy and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:238-43.
18. Clarkston WK, Tsen TN, Dies DF, et al. Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:42-8.
19. Balaban DH, Leavell BS Jr, Oblinger MJ, et al. Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:827-32.
20. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, et al. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: Efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:346-52.
21. Hsu CW, Imperiale TF. Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:276-82.
22. Oliveira L, Wexner SD, Daniel N, et al. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based oral lavage solutions. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:585-91.
23. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:100-4.
24. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1223-5.