Fear appeals prior to a high-stakes examination can have a positive or negative impact on engagement depending on how the message is appraised

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 44-45, Issue , 2016, Pages 21-31

  Putwain, David W ^a   Nicholson, Laura J ^a   Nakhla, Ghada ^a   Reece, Monika ^a   Porter, Benjamin ^a   Liversidge, Anthony ^a  

^a EDGE HILL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behavioral engagement; Challenge; Emotional engagement; Engagement; Fear appeals; Threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960912524     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Allensworth E.M. Dropout rates after high-stakes testing in elementary school: A study of the contradictory effects of Chicago's efforts to end social promotion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2005, 27(4):341-364. 10.3102/01623737027004341.
2. Anderson R.B. Vicarious and persuasive influences on efficacy expectations and intentions to perform breast self-examination. Public Relations Review 2000, 26(1):97-114. 10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00033-3.
3. Appleton J.J., Christenson S.L., Kim D., Reschly A.L. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology 2006, 44:427-445. 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.
4. Assor A., Kaplan H., Kanat-Maymon Y., Roth G. Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15(5):397-413. 10.1016/jlearninstruc.2005.07.008.
5. Au W. High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher 2007, 36(5):258-267. 10.3102/0013189X07306523.
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control 1997, Freeman, New York.
7. Barksdale-Ladd M.A., Thomas K.F. What's at stake in high-stakes testing teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education 2000, 51(5):384-397. 10.1177/0022487100051005006.
8. Bishop J.H., Mane F. The impacts of minimum competency exam graduation requirements on high school graduation, college attendance and early labor market success. Labour Economics 2001, 8(2):203-222. 10.1016/S0927-5371(01)00025-2.
9. Boyle B., Bragg J. A curriculum without foundation. British Educational Research Journal 2006, 32(4):569-582. 10.1080/01411920600775225.
10. Boyle B., Bragg J. Making primary connections: The primary story. The Curriculum Journal 2008, 19(1):5-21. 10.1080/09585170801903183.
11. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E. Effect of message repetition on argument processing, recall and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1989, 10(1):3-12. 10.1207/s15324834basp1001_2.
12. Carnoy M. Have state accountability and high-stakes tests influenced student progression rates in high school?. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2005, 24(4):19-31. 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00020.x.
13. Cho H., Boster F.J. Effects of gain versus loss frame antidrug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication 2008, 58(3):428-446. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00393.x.
14. Cismaru M., Nagpal A., Krishnamurthy P. The role of cost and response-efficacy in persuasiveness of health recommendations. Journal of Health Psychology 2009, 14(1):135-141. 10.1177/1359105308097953.
15. Covington M. Self-Worth Theory: Retrospection and prospects. Handbook of motivation at school. Handbook of motivation at school 2009, 141-170. Routledge, New York. A. Wigfield, K.R. Wentzel (Eds.).
16. Cumming J.J., Maxwell G.S. Assessment in Australian schools: Current practice and trends. Assessment in Education 2004, 11(1):89-108. 10.1080/0969594042000209010.
17. Denscombe M. Social conditions for stress: Young people's experience of doing GCSEs. British Educational Research Journal 2000, 26(3):359-374. 10.1080/713651566.
18. Dettmers S., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Goetz T., Frenzel A.C., Pekrun R. Students' emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2011, 36(1):25-35. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.001.
19. Dietrich J., Dicke A.-L., Kracke B., Noack P. Teacher support and its influence on students' intrinsic value and effort: Dimensional comparison effects across subjects. Learning and Instruction 2015, 39:45-54. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.007.
20. Dotterer A.M., Lowe K. Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2011, 40(12):1649-1660. 10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5.
21. Eccles J.S. Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. Handbook of socialization 2007, 665-691. Guilford Press, New York. J.E. Grusec, P.D. Hastings (Eds.).
22. Eccles J.S., O'Neill S.A., Wigfield A. Ability self-perceptions and subjective task-values in adolescents and children. What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development 2005, 239-247. Springer, New York. K. A. Moore, L.H. Lippman (Eds.).
23. Finn J.D., Zimmer K.S. Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter?. Research on student engagement 2012, 97-131. Springer, New York, NY. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5. S.L. Chistenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
24. Folkman S. The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress and Coping 2008, 21(1):3-14. 10.1080/10615800701740457.
25. Fredricks J.A. Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into Practice 2011, 50(4):327-335. 10.1080/00405841.2011.607401.
26. Fredricks J.A., Blumenfeld P.C., Paris A.H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 2004, 74(1):59-109. 10.3102/00346543074001059.
27. Fredricks J., McColskey W., Meli J., Mordica J., Montrosse B., Mooney K. Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: a description of 21 instruments (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011-No. 098). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast; Retrieved from. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
28. Gallagher K.M., Updegraff J.A. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2012, 43(1):101-116. 10.1007/s12160-012-9446-6.
29. Garcia-Marques T., Mackie D.M. The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing. Social Cognition 2001, 19(1):9-34. 10.1521/soco.19.1.9.18959.
30. Gregory K., Clarke M. High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore. Theory into Practice 2003, 42(1):66-74. 10.1207/s15430421tip4201_9.
31. Gulek C. Preparing for high-stakes testing. Theory into Practice 2003, 42(1):42-50. 10.1207/s15430421tip4201_6.
32. Harlen W. Teachers' summative practices and assessment for learning-tensions and synergies. Curriculum Journal 2005, 16(2):207-223. 10.1080/09585170500136093.
33. Heath A.F., Rothon C., Kilpi E. The second generation in Western Europe: Education, unemployment, and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology 2008, 34:211-235. 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134728.
34. Hijzen D., Boekaerts M., Vedder P. Exploring the links between students' engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17(6):673-687. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.020.
35. Hwang Y., Cho H., Sands L., Jeong S.H. Effects of gain and loss-framed messages on the sun safety behaviour of adolescents: The moderating role of risk perceptions. Journal of Health Psychology 2011, 17(6):929-940. 10.1177/1359105311428536.
36. Jacob B.A. Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics 2005, 89(5):761-796. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004.
37. Jang H. Supporting students' motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100(4):798. 10.1037/a0012841.
38. Jimerson S., Campos E., Gried J. Towards an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist 2003, 8(1):7-28. 10.1007/BF03340893.
39. Johnson M., Crisp V. An exploration of the effect of pre-release examination materials on classroom practice in the UK. Research in Education 2009, 82(1):47-59. 10.7227/RIE.82.4.
40. Jones B.D. The unintended outcomes of high-stakes testing. Journal of Applied School Psychology 2007, 23(2):65-86. 10.1300/J370v23n02_05.
41. Lam S., Wong B.P.H., Yang H., Liu Y. Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. Research on student engagement 2012, 403-419. Springer., New York. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_19. S.L. Chistenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
42. Lazarus R.S. Stress and emotion 2006, Springer, New York.
43. Leathwood C. Assessment policy and practice in higher education: Purpose, standards and equity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2005, 30(3):307-324. 10.1080/02602930500063876.
44. Linnenbrink-Garcia L., Rogat T.K., Koskey K.L. Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2011, 36(1):13-24. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001.
45. Mainhard M.T., Brekelmans M., Wubbels T. Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Within-and across-lesson associations with the classroom social climate. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21(3):345-354. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.003.
46. Maloney E.K., Lapinksi M.K., Witte K. Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2011, 5(4):206-219. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x.
47. Marsh H.W., Hau K.T., Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cut-off values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 2004, 11(3):320-341. 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
48. Marsh H.W., Hau K.-T., Grayson D. Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modelling. Contemporary psychometrics. A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald 2005, 275-340. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. A. Maydeu-Olivares, J. McArdle (Eds.).
49. Marsh H.W., Lüdtke O., Nagengast B., Trautwein U., Morin A.J.S., Abduljabbar A.S., et al. Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist 2012, 47(2):106-124. 10.1080/00461520.2012.670488.
50. Marsh H.W., Lüdtke O., Robitzsch A., Trautwein U., Asparouhov T., Muthén B., et al. Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2009, 44(6):764-802. 10.1080/00273170903333665.
51. Martin A.J. Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 77:413-440. 10.1348/000709906X118036.
52. Martin A.J. Motivation and engagement; Conceptual, operational, and empirical clarity. Research on student engagement 2012, 303-311. Springer., New York. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_14. S.L. Chistenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
53. Martin A.J., Anderson J., Bobis J., Way J., Vellar R. Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104(1):1-18. 10.1037/a0025988.
54. McCarthy P.J. Positive emotion in sport performance: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2011, 4(1):50-69. 10.1080/1750984X.2011.560955.
55. Meijen C., Jones M.C., McCarthy P.J., Sheffield D., Allen M.S. Cognitive and affective components of challenge and threat states. Journal of Sports Sciences 2013, 31(8):847-855. 10.1080/02640414.2012.753157.
56. Moons W.G., Mackie D.M., Garcia-Marques T. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96(1):32. 10.1037/a0013461.
57. Moreton T.A., Rabinovich A., Marshall D., Bretschneider P. The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21(1):103-109. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013.
58. Morin A.J.S., Marsh H.W., Nagengast B., Scalas L.F. Doubly latent multilevel analyses of classroom climate: An illustration. The Journal of Experimental Education 2014, 82(2):143-167. 10.1080/00220973.2013.769412.
59. Oades L.G., Robinson P., Green S., Spence G.B. Towards a positive university. Journal of Positive Psychology 2011, 6(6):432-439. 10.1080/17439760.2011.634828.
60. Onion A.J. What use is mathematics to me? A report on the outcomes from student focus groups. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications 2004, 23(4):189-194. 10.1093/teamat/23.4.189.
61. Pekrun R., Goetz T., Daniels L.M., Stupnisky R.H., Perry R.P. Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 102(3):531. 10.1037/a0019243.
62. Peters G.-J.Y., Ruiter R.A.C., Kok G. Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review 2013, 7:sup1. 10.1080/17437199.2012.703527.
63. Pianta R.C., Hamre B.K., Allen J.P. Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. Research on student engagement 2012, 365-401. Springer, New York. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17. S.L. Chistenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
64. Popova L. The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior 2012, 39(4):455-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198111418108.
65. Putwain D.W. Supporting assessment stress in Key Stage 4 Students. Educational Studies 2008, 34(2):83-95. 10.1080/03055690701811081.
66. Putwain D.W. Assessment and examination stress in Key Stage 4. British Educational Research Journal 2009, 35(3):391-411. 10.1080/01411920802044404.
67. Putwain D.W., Best N. Fear appeals in the primary classroom: effects on test anxiety and test grade. Learning and Individual Differences 2011, 21(5):580-584. 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.007.
68. Putwain D.W., Best N. Do highly test anxious pupils respond differentially to fear appeals made prior to a test?. Research in Education 2012, 88(2):1-10. 10.7227/RIE.88.1.1.
69. Putwain D.W., Remedios R. Fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes examination: What makes them threatening?. Learning and Individual Differences 2014, 36(1):145-151. 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.018.
70. Putwain D.W., Remedios R. The scare tactic: Messages which contain fear appeals prior to a high-stakes test predict lower self-determined motivation and exam scores. School Psychology Quarterly 2014, 29(4):503-516. 10.1037/spq0000048.
71. Putwain D.W., Remedios R., Symes W. The appraisal of fear appeals as threatening or challenging: Frequency of use, academic self-efficacy and subjective value. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology 2014, Advance online publication. 10.1080/01443410.2014.963028.
72. Putwain D.W., Remedios R., Symes W. Fear appeals used prior high-stakes examinations: Why are they appraised as threatening and do they impact on subjective task value?. Learning and Instruction 2015, 40(1):21-28. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.007.
73. Putwain D.W., Roberts C.M. The development and validation of the teachers use of fear appeals questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 79(4):643-661. 10.1348/000709909X426130.
74. Putwain D.W., Roberts C.M. Fear and efficacy appeals in the classroom: The secondary teachers' perspective. Educational Psychology 2012, 32(3):355-372. 10.1080/01443410.2012.659845.
75. Putwain D.W., Symes W. Teachers' use of fear appeals in the Mathematics classroom: Worrying or motivating students?. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2011, 81(3):456-474. 10.1348/2044-8279.002005.
76. Putwain D.W., Symes W. Classroom fear appeals and examination performance: Facilitating or debilitating outcomes?. Learning and Individual Differences 2011, 21(2):227-232. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.022.
77. Putwain D.W., Symes W. Subjective value and academic self-efficacy: The appraisal of fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes test as threatening or challenging. Social Psychology of Education 2014, 17(2):229-248. 10.1007/s11218-014-9249-7.
78. Reeve J. A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement 2012, 149-172. Springer, New York. S.L. Chistenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
79. Reschly A.L., Christenson S.L. Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. Research on student engagement 2012, 3-19. Springer, New York. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1. S.L. Chistenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
80. Reyes M.R., Brackett M.A., Rivers S.E., White M., Salovey P. Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104(3):700-712. 10.1037/a0027268.
81. Roberts K. School-to-work transitions: Why the United Kingdom's educational ladders always fail to connect. International Studies in Sociology of Education 2004, 14(3):203-216. 10.1080/09620210400200126.
82. Roehrig A.D., Christesen E. Development and use of a tool for evaluating teacher effectiveness in grades K-12. InnovativeaAssessment for the 21st century 2010, 207-228. Springer, New York. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6530-1_12. V.J. Shute, B.J. Becker (Eds.).
83. Roehrig A.D., Guidry L.O., Bodur Y., Guan Q., Guo Y., Pop M. Guided field observations: Variables related to pre-service teachers' knowledge about effective primary reading instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction 2008, 47(2):76-98. 10.1080/19388070801938247.
84. Roseman I.J. Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review 2013, 5(2):141-149. 10.1177/1754073912469591.
85. Ruiter R.A.D., Kessels L.T.E., Peters G.-J., Kok G. Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology 2014, 49(2):63-70. 10.1002/ijop.12042.
86. Ryan A.M., Patrick H. The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal 2001, 38(2):437-460. 10.3102/00028312038002437.
87. Ryan R.M., Weinstein N. Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education 2009, 7(2):224-233. 10.1177/1477878509104327.
88. Schunk D., Pajares F. The development of self-efficacy. Development of achievement motivation 2002, 16-32. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. A. Wigfield, J.S. Eccles (Eds.).
89. Shiota M.N., Neufeld W.H., Yeung W.H., Moser S.E., Perea E.F. Feeling good: Autonomic system responding in five positive emotions. Emotion (Washington, D.C.) 2011, 11(6):1369-1378. 10.1037/a0024278.
90. Sin N.L., Lyubomirsky S. Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2009, 65(5):467-487. 10.1002/jclp.20593.
91. Skinner E.A., Chi U. Intrinsic motivation and engagement as "active ingredients" in garden-based education: Examining models and measures derived from self-determination theory. The Journal of Environmental Education 2012, 43(1):16-36. 10.1080/00958964.2011.596856.
92. Skinner E.A., Furrer C., Marchand G., Kinderman T. Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100(4):765-781. 10.1037/a0012840.
93. Skinner E.A., Kindermann T.A., Furrer C.J. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2009, 69(3):493-525. 10.1177/0013164408323233.
94. Skinner N., Brewer M. The dynamics of threat and challenge appraisals prior to stressful achievement events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83(3):678-692. 10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.678.
95. Sprinkle R., Hunt S., Simonds C., Comadena M. Fear in the classroom: An examination of teachers' use of fear appeals and students learning outcomes. Communication Education 2006, 55(4):389-402. 10.1080/03634520600879170.
96. Swann W., Chang-Schneider C., McClarty K. Do people's self-views matter? self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist 2007, 62(2):84-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.84.
97. Symes W., Putwain D.W., Remedios R. Academic buoyancy and the appraisal of fear appeals, used prior to a high-stakes examination, as threatening or challenging. School Psychology International 2015, 36(6):605-619. 10.1177/0143034315610622.
98. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Marsh H.W., Nagy G. Within-school social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101(4):853. 10.1037/a0016306.
99. Trautwein U., Marsh H.W., Nagengast B., Lüdtke O., Nagy G., Jonkmann K. Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104(3):763-777. 10.1037/a0027470.
100. Troman G. Primary teacher identity, commitment and career in performative school cultures. British Educational Research Journal 2008, 34(5):619-633. 10.1080/01411920802223925.
101. Umphrey L.R. Message defensiveness, efficacy, and health-related behavioral intentions. Communication Research Reports 2004, 21(4):329-337. 10.1080/08824090409359997.
102. Upadyaya K., Salmela-Aro K. Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts. European Psychologist 2013, 18(2):136-147. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000143.
103. Voelkl K.E. School identification. Handbook of research on student engagement 2012, 193-218. Springer, New York. S.L. Chistenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
104. Walker C.O., Greene B.A. The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research 2009, 102(6):463-472. 10.3200/JOER.102.6.463-472.
105. Wang M.-T., Eccles J.S. Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development 2012, 83(3):877-895. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x.
106. Wang M.-T., Eccles J.S. School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction 2013, 28:12-23. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002.
107. Wang M.-T., Holcombe R. Adolescents' perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal 2010, 47(3):633-662. 10.3102/0002831209361209.
108. Waters L. A review of school-based positive psychology interventions. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist 2011, 28(2):75-90. 10.1375/aedp.28.2.75.
109. Wigfield A., Eccles J.S. Academic self-efficacy -value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000, 25(1):68-81. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
110. Wigfield A., Tonks S., Klauda S.L. Academic self-efficacy - value theory. Handbook of motivation at school 2009, 55-77. Routledge, New York. A. Wigfield, K.R. Wentzel (Eds.).
111. Witte K., Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior 2000, 27(5):591-615. 10.1177/109019810002700506.