Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-18

  Martin, Andrew J ^a   Anderson, Judy ^a   Bobis, Janette ^a   Way, Jennifer ^a   Vellar, Rosemary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Catholic Education Office   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aspirations; Disengagement; Engagement; Mathematics; Multilevel

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863311736     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025988     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/07495978(91)90020-T
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
3. Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In P. A. Alexander & P. Winne. (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 369-389). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939
5. Australian Academy of Science. (2006). Mathematics and statistics: Critical skills for Australia's future. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Academy of Science.
6. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010). My school. Available at http://www.myschool.edu.au
7. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & Mac Iver, D. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middlegrades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223-235. doi:10.1080/00461520701621079
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
9. Barrington, F. (2006). Participation in Year 12 mathematics across Australia 1995-2004. Melbourne, Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute.
10. Bessant, K. C. (1995). Factors associated with types of mathematics anxiety in college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 327-345. doi:10.2307/749478
11. Bobis, J. (2000). Supporting teachers implement a numeracy education agenda (ED461509). Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
12. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed). Six theories of child development: Revised reformulations and current issues (pp. 187-249). London, England: Kingsley.
14. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). The bioecological theory of human development. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 6963-6970). New York, NY: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00359-4
15. Brown, M., Brown, P., & Bibby, (2007). "I would rather die": Attitudes of 16-year-olds towards their future participation in mathematics. In D. Kuchemann (Ed). Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics: Vol. 27. London, England: British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.
16. Card, D. E., & Krueger, A. B. (1996). School resources and student outcomes: An overview of the literature and new evidence from North and South Carolina. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 31-50. doi:10.1257/jep.10.4.31
17. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246. doi:10.1037/00219010.83.2.234
18. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
19. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
20. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C-L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
21. Doig, B. (2005). Research pointers to practice: A review of research to inform middle years mathematics teaching and learning. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Association for Mathematics Teachers.
22. Duran, B., & Weffer, R. (1992). Immigrants' aspirations, high school process, and academic outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 163-181.
23. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628-644. doi:10.1037/00223514.76.4.628
24. Forgasz, H. (2006). Australian year 12 "intermediate" level mathematics enrolments 2000-2004. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 211-220). Canberra, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
25. Friedel, J. M., Cortina, K. S., Turner, J. C., & Midgley, C. (2010). Changes in efficacy beliefs in mathematics across the transition to middle school: Examining the effects of perceived teacher and parent goal emphases. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 102-114. doi:10.1037/ a0017590
26. Fry, P., & Coe, K. (1980). Interactions among dimensions of academic motivation and classroom social climate: A study of the perceptions of junior high and high school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 33-42. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1980.tb00795.x
27. Fuchs, T., & Wobmann, L. (2005). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school (Working Paper No. 8, pp. 1-29). Munich, Germany: Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
28. Glick, J. E., & Hohmann-Marriott, B. (2007). Academic performance of young children in immigrant families: The significance of race, ethnicity, and national origins. International Migration Review, 41, 371-402. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00072.x
29. Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London, England: Hodder Arnold.
30. Goldstein, H., & Thomas, S. (1996). Using examination results as indicators of school and college performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 159, 149-163.
31. Gonzalez, A. (2002). Parental involvement: Its contribution to high school students' motivation. Urban Education, 75, 132-135.
32. Gottfried, G. A. (1984). Home environment and early cognitive development: Longitudinal research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
33. Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201-218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Green, J., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics, and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 269-279. doi:10.1016/ j.lindif.2006.12.003
35. Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Utley, C. A., Montagna, D., & Walker, D. (1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychology Review, 22, 497-516.
36. Gurtner, J.-L., Monnard, I., & Genoud, P. A. (2001). Towards a multilayer model of context and its impact on motivation. In S. Volet, & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 189-208). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
37. Hancock, D. R. (2001). Effects of test anxiety and evaluative threat on students' achievement and motivation. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 284-290. doi:10.1080/00220670109598764
38. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Oxford, England: Routledge.
39. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). An exchange: Part I. Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
40. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33-46. doi: 10.2307/749455
41. Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23, 191-201. doi: 10.1080/02671520802048729
42. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
43. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
44. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
45. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. The Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
46. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17, 494-509. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002
47. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205-227.
48. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
49. Loveless, T. (2009). How well are American students learning? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
50. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26-47. doi: 10.2307/749662
51. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
52. Mann, S. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 7-19. doi: 10.1080/03075070020030689
53. Mansour, M., & Martin, A. J. (2009). Home, parents, and achievement motivation: A study of key home and parental factors that predict student motivation and engagement. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 26, 111-126.
54. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
55. Marsh, H. W. (1993). The multidimensional structure of academic selfconcept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841-860.
56. Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
57. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big fish-little-pond effect. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. 2, pp. 83-123). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
58. Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Cheng, J. (2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 78-95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.78
59. Marsh, H. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept An application of multilevel modeling. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65-87.
60. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K.-T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350. doi:10.1007/ s10648-008-9075-6
61. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., & Koller, O. (2008). Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: Role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 510-524. doi:10.1037/00220663.100.3.510
62. Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440. doi:10.1348/ 000709906X118036
63. Martin, A. J. (2008). The Motivation and Engagement Scale. Sydney, Australia: Lifelong Achievement Group. Available from www.lifelongachievement.com
64. Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic life span: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794-824. doi:10.1177/0013164409332214
65. Martin, A. J. (2011). Prescriptive statements and educational practice: What can structural equation modeling (SEM) offer? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 235-244. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9160-0
66. Martin, A. J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2011). Patterns of multilevel variance in psycho-educational phenomena: Exploring motivation, engagement, climate, teacher, and achievement factors. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 49-61. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000029
67. Martin, A. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: Examining "short" and "core" flow in diverse performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 141-157. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9094-0
68. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2005). Motivating boys and motivating girls: Does teacher gender really make a difference? Australian Journal of Education, 49, 320-334.
69. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 267-281. doi:10.1002/pits.20149
70. Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Cheng, J., & Ginns, P. (2010). Fathers and male teachers: Effects on boys' academic and non-academic development. Childhood Education, 86, 404-408.
71. Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Williamson, A., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping, defensive pessimism, and goal orientation: A qualitative study of university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 617-628. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.617
72. Matthews, A., & Pepper, D. (2005). Evaluation of participation in A-level mathematics: Interim report. London, England: Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency.
73. McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247
74. McInerney, D. (2000). Helping kids achieve their best. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
75. McLeod, D. B. (1993). Connecting research to teaching. Mathematics Teacher, 86, 761-763.
76. McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why Not? Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations.
77. Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65-88. doi: 10.2307/749630
78. Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1978). Classroom social climate and student absences and grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 263-269. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.70.2.263
79. Nardi, E., & Steward, S. (2003). Is mathematics T. I. R. E. D? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 345-366. doi:10.1080/01411920301852
80. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
81. Newman, M., Garrett, Z., Elbourne, D., Bradley, S., Noden, P., Taylor, J., & West, A. (2006). Does secondary school size make a difference? A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 1, 41-60. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2006.03.001
82. Newstead, K. (1998). Aspects of children's mathematics anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 53-71. doi:10.1023/A: 1003177809664
83. Nichols, S. (2009, March). Fathers in educational research. Paper presented at the Gender and Education Conference, London, England.
84. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris, France: Author.
85. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed. Paris, France: Author.
86. Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Exploratory factor analysis of the Mathematics Anxiety Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 35-47.
87. Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112, 1137-1162.
88. Pleck, J. H., & Masciadrelli, B. P. (2003). Parental involvement by U.S. residential fathers: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E. Lamb (Ed). The role of the father in child development (4th ed., pp. 222-271). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
89. Pomerantz, E., & Moorman, E. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents' involvement in children's academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373-410. doi: 10.3102/ 003465430305567
90. Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2010). A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.18. London, England: University of London, Institute of Education.
91. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
92. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A process model of mathematics achievement and attitude. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 306-328. doi:10.2307/749308
93. Roeser, R., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 443471. doi:10.1086/499650
94. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
95. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents' motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds). Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29-52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
97. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2006). Teacher actions to maximize mathematics learning opportunities in heterogeneous classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 117-143. doi:10.1007/s10763-005-9002-y
98. Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 81-99. doi:10.1007/ s10649-006-1348-8
99. Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010). PISA in brief: Highlights from the full Australian Report. Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
100. Thomson, S., & Fleming, N. (2004). Summing it up: Mathematics achievement in Australian schools in TIMSS 2002 (TIMSS Australia Monograph No. 7). Canberra, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
101. Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relations between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111-133. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
102. Wang, M.-T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents' perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 633-662. doi:10.3102/ 0002831209361209
103. Whitby, K., & Lord, P. (with O'Donnell, S., & Grayson, H). (2006). Dips in performance and motivation: A purely English perception? Slough, England: National Foundation for Educational Research, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
104. White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461-481. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.461
105. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children's domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-565. doi:10.1037/ 0012-1649.27.4.552
106. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. doi:10.1006/ ceps.1999.1015
107. Wigfield, A., & Tonks, S. (2002). Adolescents' expectancies for success and achievement task values during middle and high school years. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 53-82). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
108. Wilkinson, G. A. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test-Revision 3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Association.
109. Yair, G. (2000). Educational battlefields in America: The tug of war over students' engagement with instruction. Sociology of Education, 73, 247-269. doi:10.2307/2673233
110. Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2009). Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 467-482. doi:10.1037/a0015453
111. Zohar, D. (1998). An additive model of test anxiety: Role of exam-specific expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 330-340. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.330