Students' emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-35

  Dettmers, Swantje ^a   Trautwein, Ulrich ^b   Lüdtke, Oliver ^b   Goetz, Thomas ^c,d   Frenzel, Anne C ^e   Pekrun, Reinhard ^f  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^d Thurgau University of Teacher Education   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Achievement emotions; Effort; Homework; Homework emotions

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650545075     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams, R., & Wu, M. (2002). PISA 2000: Technical report. Paris, France: OECD.
2. Baumert J., Kunter M., Blum W., Brunner M., Voss T., Jordan, et al. Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal 2010, 47:133-180. doi:0.3102/0002831209345157.
3. Cacioppo J.T., Berntson G.G., Larsen J.T., Poehlmann K.M., Ito T.A. The psychophysiology of emotion. Handbook of emotions 2000, 173-191. Guilford, New York, NY. 2nd ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.).
4. Chen C., Stevenson H. Homework: A cross-cultural examination. Child Development 1989, 60:551-561. 10.2307/1130721.
5. Cooper H. Homework 1989, Longman, White Plains, NY.
6. Corno L., Xu J. Homework as the job of childhood. Theory into Practice 2004, 43:227-233. 10.1207/s15430421tip4303_9.
7. Dettmers S., Trautwein U., Lüdtke M., Kunter M., Baumert J. Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 102:467-482. 10.1037/a0018453.
8. Eccles J.S., Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53:109-132. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
9. Else-Quest N.M., Hyde J.S., Hejmadi A. Mother and child emotions during mathematics homework. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2008, 10:5-35. 10.1080/10986060701818644.
10. Enders C.K., Tofighi D. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods 2007, 12:121-138. 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
11. Frenzel A., Pekrun R., Goetz T. Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:478-493. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.001.
12. Ganzeboom H.B.G., de Graaf P.M., Treiman D.J., de Leeuw J. A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research 1992, 21:1-56. 10.1007/BF03173468.
13. Goetz T., Cronjaeger H., Frenzel A.C., Lüdtke O., Hall N.C. Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2010, 35:44-58. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.001.
14. Goetz T., Frenzel A., Hall N., Pekrun R. Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2008, 33:9-33. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002.
15. Goetz T., Frenzel A.C., Pekrun R. The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education 2006, 75:5-29. 10.3200/JEXE.75.1.5-29.
16. Goetz T., Frenzel C.A., Pekrun R., Hall N.C., Lüdtke O. Between- and within-domain relations of students' academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 99:715-733. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.715.
17. Goetz, T., Nett, U., Martiny, S., Hall, N. C., Pekrun, R., Dettmers, S., & Trautwein, U. (submitted for publication). Students' emotions experienced when doing homework: Structures, self-concept antecedents, and achievement outcomes.
18. Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4.-12. Klassen, revision (KFT 4-12+R) (Cognitive abilities test, revised version (KFT 4-12+R)). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
19. Karabenick S.A. Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology 2004, 96:569-581. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.569.
20. Krull J.L., MacKinnon D.P. Multilevel modeling of individual and group-level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2001, 36:249-277. 10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06.
21. Kunter M., Baumert J. Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environment Research 2006, 9:231-251. 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7.
22. Leone C.M., Richards M.H. Classwork and homework in early adolescence. The ecology of achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1989, 18:531-548. 10.1007/BF02139072.
23. Linnenbrink E.A. The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. Emotion in education 2007, 107-124. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, doi:10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50008-3. P.A. Schutz, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
24. Lüdtke O., Marsh H.W., Robitzsch A., Trautwein U., Asparouhov T., Muthén B. The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods 2008, 13:203-229. 10.1037/a0012869.
25. Lüdtke O., Robitzsch A., Trautwein U., Kunter M. Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2009, 34:120-131. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001.
26. Meyer D., Turner J. Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review 2006, 18:377-390. 10.1007/s10648-006-9032-1.
27. Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. MPlus user's guide 2007, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
28. Op't Eynde P., Turner J. Focusing on the complexity of emotion issues in academic learning: A dynamical component systems approach. Educational Psychology Review 2006, 18:361-376. 10.1007/s10648-006-9031-2.
29. Pekrun R. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review 2006, 18:315-341. 10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
30. Pekrun R., Frenzel A.C., Goetz T., Perry R.P. Theoretical perspectives on emotions in education. Emotion in education 2007, 13-36. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, doi:10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50003-4. P.A. Schutz, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
31. Pekrun R., Goetz T., Daniels L.M., Stupnisky R.H., Perry R.P. Boredom in achievement settings: Control-value antecedents and performance consequences of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 102:531-549. doi:10.1037a0019243.
32. Pekrun R., Goetz T., Titz W., Perry R.P. Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 2002, 37:91-105. 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.
33. Peugh J.L., Enders C.K. Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research 2004, 74:525-556. 10.3102/00346543074004525.
34. Prenzel M., Carstensen C., Schöps K., Maurischat C. Die Anlage des Längsschnitts bei PISA 2003 (The longitudinal design of the PISA 2003 study). PISA 2003. Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres 2006, 29-62. Waxmann, Münster, Germany. M. Prenzel, J. Baumert, W. Blum, R. Lehmann, D. Leutner, M. Neubrand, R. Pekrun, J. Rost, U. Schiefele (Eds.).
35. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
36. Rubin D.B. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys 1987, Wiley, New York, NY.
37. Schafer J.L. Multiple imputation with pan. New methods for the analysis of change 2001, 357-377. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, doi:10.1037/10409-012. L.M. Collins, A.G. Sayer (Eds.).
38. Schafer, J. L. (2008). The pan package. Retrieved 04.04.08. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pan/pan.pdf.
39. Thorndike R.L., Hagen E. The cognitive abilities test: Form 5 1993, The Riverside Publishing Company, Itasca, IL.
40. Trautwein U. The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:372-388. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009.
41. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O. Students' self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-students differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 99:432-444. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.432.
42. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O. Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:243-258.
43. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Kastens C., Köller O. Effort on homework in grades 5 through 9: Development, motivational antecedents, and the association with effort on classwork. Child Development 2006, 77:1094-1111. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00921.x.
44. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Roberts B.W., Schnyder I., Niggli A. Different forces, same consequence. Conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:1115-1128. 10.1037/a0017048.
45. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Schnyder I., Niggli A. Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98:438-456. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438.
46. Trautwein U., Niggli A., Schnyder I., Lüdtke O. Between-teacher differences in homework assignments and the development of students' homework effort, homework emotions, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:176-189. 10.1037/0022-0663.101.1.176.
47. Trautwein U., Schnyder I., Niggli A., Neumann M., Lüdtke O. Chameleon effects in homework research: The homework-achievement association depends on the measures used and the level of analysis chosen. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2009, 34:77-88. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.001.
48. Turner J.E., Schallert D.L. Expectancy-value relationships of shame reactions and shame resiliency. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 93:320-329. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.320.
49. Verma S., Sharma D., Larson R.W. School stress in India: Effects on time and daily emotions. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2002, 26:500-508. 10.1080/01650250143000454.
50. Warton P. The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist 2001, 36:155-165. 10.1207/S15326985EP3603_2.
51. Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 1985, 92:548-573. 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548.
52. Wigfield A., Wagner A.L. Competence, motivation, and identity development during adolescence. Handbook of competence and motivation 2005, 222-239. Guilford, New York, NY. A.J. Elliot, C.S. Dweck (Eds.).
53. Xu J. Homework emotion management reported by high school students. The School Community Journal 2005, 15:21-36.