The unintended outcomes of high-stakes testing

Journal of Applied School Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 65-86

  Jones, Brett D ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; High stakes tests; Instructional effects; Motivation; Unintended outcomes

Indexed keywords

EID: 71649110208     PISSN: 15377903     EISSN: 15377911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J370v23n02_05     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 18-29.
2. Adebi, J. (2003) Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometric issues. Educational Assessment, 8(3), 231-258.
3. American Educational Research Association. (2004, December). High-stakes testing in PreK-12 education. Retrieved March 30, 2006, from http://www.aera.net/policyandprograms/?id=378
4. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on students' motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32-38.
5. Barksdale-Ladd, M., & Thomas, K. (2000). What's at stake in high-stakes testing: Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 384-397.
6. Berliner, D. C. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949-995.
7. Booher-Jennings, J. (2006). Rationing education in an era of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 756-761.
8. Bracey, G. W. (2006). Dropping in on dropouts. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 798-799.
9. Bush, J. (2003). Lessons learned in the Sunshine State. Hoover Digest, 3. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://www.hooverdigest.org/033/bush.htmlA
10. Catalanello, R. (2004, February 1). Kicking "FCAT essay"habit. St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved February 6, 2004, from http://www.sptimes.com.
11. Center on Education Policy. (2006, March). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved March 30, 2006, from http://www.cep-dc.org/nclb/Year4/Press/
12. Cimbricz, S. (2002). State-mandated testing and teachers' beliefs and practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved April 18, 2005 from http://epaa.asu.edu/apaa/v10n2.html
13. Coley, J. (2003). Growth in school revisited: Achievement gains from the fourth to the eighth grade. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
14. Connecticut State Department of Education. (2005, March 2). Cost of Implementing the Federal No Child Left Behind Act in Connecticut: State-Level Costs, Part I. Retrieved July 19, 2006, from http://www.state.ct.us/sde/NCLB_Study_2_28_05.pdf
15. Cosentino de Cohen, C., Deterding, N., & Clewel, B.C. (2005). Who'sleftbehind: Immigrant children in high and low LEP schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute
16. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). CTP research report: Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/LDH_1999.pdf
17. DeBard, R., & Kubow, P. K. (2002). From compliance to commitment: The need for constituent discourse in implementing testing policy. Educational Policy, 16(3), 387-405.
18. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
19. Disability Rights Advocates. (2001). Do no harm-High stakes testing and students with learning disabilities. Oakland, CA: LD Access Foundation. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.dralegal.org/publications/do_no_harm.php
20. Egley, R. J., & Jones, B. D. (2004). Rural elementary administrators' views of high-stakes testing. The Rural Educator, 26(1), 30-39.
21. English, F. W. (2002). On the intractability of the achievement gap in urban schools and the discursive practice of continuing racial discrimination. Education and Urban Society, 34(3), 298-311.
22. Filbin, J. (2002). No more field trips on test days: How studentswith disabilitiesbenefit from the CSAP. Inside Special Education, 3(2), 2. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/download/pdf/inside_fall2001.pdf
23. Firestone, W. A., & Mayrowetz, D. (2000). Rethinking "high stakes": Lessons from the United States and England and Wales. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 724-749.
24. Firestone, W. A., Mayrowetz, D., & Fairman, J. (1998). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 95-113.
25. Firestone, W. A., Monfils, L., Camilli, G., Schorr, R. Y., Hicks, J. E., & Mayrowetz, D. (2002). The ambiguity of test preparation: A multimethod analysis in one state. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1485-1523.
26. Florida Department of Education. (2003). FCAT Myths vs. Facts. Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.firn.edu/doe/sas/fcat/pdf/myths-facts.pdf
27. George, P. S. (2001). A + accountability in Florida? Educational Leadership, 59(1), 28-32.
28. Gilmer, K. R. (2002, June 13). 48 A's...and two F's. St. Petersburg Times, B1, B6.
29. Gloecker, L. C. (2001). The door to opportunity: Let's open it for everyone. State Education Standard, 2, 21-25.
30. Goldschmidt, P., & Wang, J. (1999). When can schools affect dropout behavior? A longitudinal multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 715-738.
31. Goodlad, J. I. (1979). What are schools for? Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappan.
32. Gordon, S. P., & Reese, M. (1997). High-stakes testing: Worth the price? Journal of School Leadership, 7, 345-368.
33. Haney, W. (2000, August 19). The myth of the Texas miracle. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved March 30, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
34. Haney, W. (2002, May 6). Lake Woebeguaranteed: Misuse of test scores in Massachusetts, Part I. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(24). Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n24/
35. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. HISD Connect (no date). Teacher Performance Pay. Retrieved March 29, 2006 from http://www.houstonisd.org/
37. Hodges, V. P. (2002). High stakes testing and its impact on rural schools. Rural Educator, 24(2), 3-7.
38. Hoffman, J., Assaf, L., & Paris, S. (2001). High-stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow? The Reading Teacher, 54, 482-492.
39. Holbrook, P. J. (2001). When bad things happen to good children: A special educator's views of MCAS. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(10), 781
40. Horn, C. (2003). High-stakes testing and students: Stopping or perpetuating a cycle of failure? Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 30-41.
41. Jacob, B. A. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of high school graduation exams. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 99-121.
42. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004, April 15). Learning to understand or learning to achieve? Effects of high-stakes testing on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
43. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004a). Is testing the right direction? Administrators share their thoughts. ERS Spectrum, 22(3), 16-25.
44. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004b, April 15). Learning to understand or learning to achieve? Effects of high-stakes testing on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
45. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004c). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers' perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39). Retrieved August 23, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n39/
46. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 199-203.
47. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., & Hargrove, T. Y. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
48. Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G. F., & Raczek, A. (1996). The use of external examinations to improve student motivation. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
49. Kellow, J. T., & Jones, B. D. (2005). Stereotype threat in African-American high school students: An initial investigation. Current Issues in Education, 8(20). Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://cie.asu.edu/volume8/number20
50. Koretz, D., & Hamilton, L. (2001). The performance of students with disabilities on the New York Regents comprehensive examination of English (CSE technical report 540). University of California, Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation. Retrieved March 25, 2006, from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/CRESST/pages/reports.htm
51. Lee, J. (2006). Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps: An in-depth look into national and state reading and math outcome trends. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
52. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the "Overjustification Hypothesis." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129-137.
53. McNeil, L. M.(2000). Contradictionsof school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
54. National Association of School Psychologists (2003). Position statement on using large scale assessment for high stakes decisions. Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.nasponline.org/information/pospaper_largescale.html
55. National Center for Educational Statistics (2004). National assessment of educational progress: 2004 long-term trend assessment results. Retrieved August 4, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard
56. National Research Council. 2000. How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
57. Nelson, J. R. (2002). Closing or widening the gap of inequality: The intended and unintended consequences of Minnesota's Basic Standards Tests for Students with Disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
58. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002, January 8). Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
59. Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston College: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
60. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
61. Popham, W. J. (1999). Why standardized tests don't measure educational quality. Educational Leadership, 56(6), 8-15.
62. Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for educational leaders. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
63. Popham, W. J. (2004). America's "failing" schools: How parents and teachers can cope with No Child Left Behind. New York: Routledge Falmer.
64. Rapp, D. (2002). National board certified teachers in Ohio give state education policy, classroom climate, and high-stakes testing a grade of F. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(3), 215-218.
65. Reese, M., Gordon, S. P., & Price, L. R. (2004). Teachers' perceptions of high-stakes testing. Journal of School Leadership, 14(5), 464-496.
66. Reeves, E. B. (2000). High-stakes accountability and contextual effects: An empirical study of the fairness issue. Research in the Schools, 7(2), 49-58.
67. Schulte, A., Villwock, D. V., Whichard, S. M., & Stallings, C. (2001). High-stakes and expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities: A five-year study of one district. School Psychology Review, 30, 487-506.
68. Shen, J., Mansberger, N. B., & Yang, H. (2004). Teacher quality and students placed at risk: Results from the baccalaureate and beyond longitudinal study 1993-1997. Educational Horizons, 82(3), 226-235.
69. Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8-11.
70. Smith, E. (2005). Raising standards in American schools: The case of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 507-524.
71. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629.
72. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811.
73. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education (2005). The widening racial scoring gap on the SAT college admissions test. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 49. Retrieved March 25, 2006, from http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
74. Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2001). 2001 State special education outcomes: A report on state activities at the beginning of a new decade. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/2001StateReport.html
75. Tobin, T. C. (2004, June 16). Few schools find reason to celebrate: Half of high schools get a D. St. Petersburg Times, pp. B1, B4.
76. Tobin, T. C. & Ave, M. (2006, May 14). Teachers troubled with job, poll says. St. Petersburg Times, pp. A1, A6.
77. Tobin, T. C., & Winchester, D. (2004, October 4). New FCAT push accelerates teaching pace. St. Petersburg Times, pp. A1, A6.
78. Tobin, T. C., & Winchester, D. (2004, November 21). Pinellas schools losing their luster. St. Petersburg Times, pp. A1, A10.
79. Triplett, C. F., Barksdale, M. A., & Leftwich, P. (2003). Children's perceptions of high stakes testing. Journal of Research in Education, 13(1), 15-21.
80. U.S. Department of Education (no date). Executive Summary. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html
81. Wheelock, A. (2003). Myopia in Massachusetts. Educational Leadership, 61(3), 50-54.
82. Wheelock, A., Bebell, D. J., & Haney, W. (2000). What can student drawings tell us about high-stakes testing in Massachusetts? Teachers College Record. Retrieved July 10, 2002 from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10634
83. Wiley, T. G., & Wright, W. E. (2004). Against the undertow: Language-minority education policy and politics in the "Age of Accountability." Educational Policy, 18(1), 142-168.
84. Wilkins, J. (2000, April). Characteristics of demographic opportunity structures and their relationship to school-level achievement: The case of Virginia's standards of learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
85. Wright, W. E. (2002). The effects of high-stakes testing on an inner-city elementary school: The curriculum, the teachers, and the English language learners. Current Issues in Education, 5(5). Retrieved March 25, 2006, from http://cie.asu.edu/volume5/number5
86. Yarbrough, T. L. (1999). Teacher perceptions of the North Carolina ABC program and the relationship to classroom practice. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
87. Ysseldyke, J., Nelson, R. J., Christenson, S., Johnson, D. R., Dennison, A., & Triezenberg, H. et al. (2004). What we know and need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 75-94.