Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, Women, And leadership

Leadership Quarterly

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 387-399

  Hoyt, Crystal L ^a   Murphy, Susan E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gender; Leadership; Reactance; Stereotype threat; Women

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954287222     PISSN: 10489843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Acker J. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 1990, 4(2):139-158. 10.1177/089124390004002002.
2. Adams G., Garcia D.M., Purdie-Vaughns V., Steele C.M. The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 42(5):602-615. 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004.
3. Aronson J., Quinn D.M., Spencer S.J. Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. Prejudice: the target's perspective 1998, 83-103. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA. J.K. Swim, C. Stangor (Eds.).
4. Baron R.A., Markman G.D., Hirsa A. Perceptions of women and men as entrepreneurs: evidence for differential effects of attributional augmenting. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86(5):923-929. 10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.923.
5. Beaman L., Duflo E., Pande R., Topalova P. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science 2012, 335(6068):582-586. 10.1126/science.1212382.
6. Bell A.E., Spencer S.J., Iserman E., Logel C.E.R. Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 2003, 92(4):307-312. 10.1177/089124390004002002.
7. Bergeron D.M., Block C.J., Echtenkamp A. Disabling the able: stereotype threat and women's work performance. Human Performance 2006, 19(2):133-158. 10.1207/s15327043hup1902_3.
8. Block C., Koch S., Liberman B., Merriweather T., Roberson L. Contending with stereotype threat at work: a model of long-term responses. The Counseling Psychologist 2011, 39:570-600. 10.1177/0011000010382459.
9. Bowles H.R., Babcock L., Lai L. Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2007, 103(1):84-103. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001.
10. Bowles H.R., Kray L.J. Negotiation is a man's game: ultimate truth or enduring myth? Gender & work: challenging conventional wisdom. Research symposium in honor of 50 years of women MBA 2013, Press, Harvard Business School.
11. Brown R.P., Pinel E.C. Stigma on my mind: individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2003, 39(6):626-633. 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00039-8.
12. Burgess D., Borgida E. Who women are, who women should be: descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 1999, 5(3):665-692. 10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665.
13. Burgess D., Joseph A., van Ryn M., Carnes M. Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine?. Academic Medicine 2012, 87(4):506-512. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318248f718.
14. Burnette J.L., Pollack J.M., Hoyt C.L. Individual differences in implicit theories of leadership ability and self-efficacy: predicting responses to stereotype threat. Journal of Leadership Studies 2010, 3(4):46-56. 10.1002/jls.20138.
15. Cadinu M., Maass A., Frigerio S., Impagliazzo L., Latinotti S. Stereotype threat: the effect of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 33(2):267-285. 10.1002/ejsp.145.
16. Cadinu M., Maass A., Lombardo M., Frigerio S. Stereotype threat: the moderating role of locus of control beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 36(2):183-197. 10.1002/ejsp.303.
17. Carnes M., Geller S., Fine E., Sheridan J., Handelsman J. NIH Director's Pioneer Awards: could the selection process be biased against women?. Journal of Women's Health 2005, 14(8):684-691. 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.684.
18. Carr P.B., Steele C.M. Stereotype threat and inflexible perseverance in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45(4):853-859. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.003.
19. Carr P.B., Steele C.M. Stereotype threat affects financial decision making. Psychological Science 2010, 21(10):1411-1416. 10.1177/0956797610384146.
20. Carton A.M., Rosette A.S. Explaining bias against Black leaders: integrating theory on information processing and goal-based stereotyping. Academy of Management Journal 2011, 54:1141-1158. 10.5465/amj.2009.0745.
21. Catalyst Women in S&P 500 companies by race/ethnicity 2015, Catalyst, New York, (Retrieved from http://catalyst.org/knowledge/women-sp-500-companies-raceethnicity).
22. Center for American Women and Politics Current numbers (Retrieved from:). http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/current-numbers.
23. Cheryan S., Plaut V.C., Davies P.G., Steele C.M. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97(6):1045. 10.1037/a0016239.
24. Cohen G.L., Garcia J. Identity, belonging, and achievement: a model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17(6):365-369. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x.
25. Cole B.A. Gender, narratives and intersectionality: can personal experience approaches to research contribute to "undoing gender"?. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 2009, 55(5/6):561-578. 10.1007/s11159-009-9140-5.
26. Collins N. Working models of attachment: implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71(4):810-832. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.810.
27. Collins R.L. Among the better ones: upward assimilation in social comparison. Handbook of social comparison: theory and research 2000, 159-172. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York. J. Suls, L. Wheeler (Eds.).
28. Crocker J., Major B., Steele C. Social stigma. The handbook of social psychology 1998, 2:554-594. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
29. Croizet J.C., Claire T. Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: the intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1998, 24(6):588-594. 10.1177/0146167298246003.
30. Dasgupta N. Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: the stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry 2011, 22(4):231-246. 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313.
31. Dasgupta N., Asgari S. Seeing is believing: exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2004, 40:642-658. 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003.
32. Davies P., Spencer S., Steele C. Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88(2):276-287. 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.
33. Davies P.G., Spencer S.J., Quinn D.M., Gerhardstein R. Consuming images: how television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28(12):1615-1628. 10.1177/014616702237644.
34. Day D.V., Fleenor J.W., Atwater L.E., Sturm R.E., McKee R.A. Advances in leader and leadership development: a review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly 2014, 25(1):63-82. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004.
35. Day D.V., Harrison M.M., Halpin S.M. An integrative theory of leadership development: connecting adult development, identity, and expertise 2009, Psychology Press, New York.
36. Deaux K., Kite M. Gender stereotypes. Psychology of women: a handbook of issues and theories 1993, 107-139. Greenwood Press/Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT, US. F. Denmark, M. Paludi (Eds.).
37. Dodge K.A., Gilroy F.D., Fenzel L.M. Requisite management characteristics revisited: two decades later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality 1995, 10(6):253-264.
38. Dweck C.S. Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality and development 1999, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA.
39. Eagly A.H. Few women at the top: how role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. Leadership and power: identity processes in groups and organizations 2004, 79-93. Sage Publications, London. D. van Knippenberg, M.A. Hogg (Eds.).
40. Eagly A.H., Carli L.L. The female leadership advantage: an evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly 2003, 14:807-834. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004.
41. Eagly A.H., Carli L.L. Through the labyrinth 2007, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Eagly A.H., Gartzia L., Carli L.L. Female advantage: revisited. The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations 2014, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. S. Kumra, R. Simpson, R. Burke (Eds.).
43. Eagly A.H., Karau S.J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 2002, 109(3):573-598. 10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.
44. Eagly A.H., Wood W., Diekman A.B. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: a current appraisal. The developmental social psychology of gender 2000, 123-174. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. T. Eckes, H.M. Trautner (Eds.).
45. Ely R.J., Ibarra H., Kolb D.M. Taking gender into account: theory and design for women's leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education 2011, 10(3):474-493. 10.5465/amle.2010.0046.
46. Emerson K.T.U., Murphy M.C. A company I can trust? Lay theories moderate stereotype threat for women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2015, 41(2):295-307. 10.1177/0146167214564969.
47. Fiske S.T., Neuberg S.L. A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in experimental social psychology 1990, vol. 23:1-74. Academic Press, New York. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
48. Forsyth D.R., Nye J.L. Seeing and being a leader: the perceptual, cognitive, and interpersonal roots of conferred influence. Leadership at the crossroads: leadership and psychology 2008, vol. 1:116-131. Praeger, Westport, CT. C.L. Hoyt, G.R. Goethals, D.R. Forsyth (Eds.).
49. Geis F.L., Brown V., Jennings J., Porter N. TV commercials as achievement scripts for women. Sex Roles 1984, 10(7):513. 10.1007/BF00287260.
50. Glick P., Fiske S.T. The ambivalence toward men inventory. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1999, 23(3):519. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x.
51. Gneezy U., Niederle M., Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2003, 118(3):1049-1074. 10.1162/00335530360698496.
52. Gonzales P.M., Blanton H., Williams K.J. The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28(5):659-670. 10.1177/0146167202288010.
53. Good C., Aronson J., Harder J.A. Problems in the pipeline: stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008, 29(1):17-28. 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004.
54. Good J.J., Woodzicka J.A., Wingfield L.C. The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. Journal of Social Psychology 2010, 150(2):132-147. 10.1080/00224540903366552.
55. Gupta V.K., Bhawe N.M. The influence of proactive personality and stereotype threat on women's entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 2007, 13(4):73-85. 10.1177/10717919070130040901.
56. Gupta V.K., Turban D., Bhawe N. The effect of gender stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93(5):1053-1061. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1053.
57. Heilman M., Okimoto T. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92(1):81-92. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81.
58. Heilman M., Wallen A., Fuchs D., Tamkins M. Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004, 89(3):416-427. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416.
59. Heilman M.E. Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior 1983, 5:269-298.
60. Heilman M.E. Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: what we know and what we don't know. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality 1995, 10(6):3-26.
61. Heilman M.E. Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57(4):657-674. 10.1111/0022-4537.00234.
62. Heilman M.E. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior 2012, 32:113-135. 10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003.
63. Hess T.M., Auman C., Colcombe S.J., Rahhal T.A. The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2003, 58(1):3-11. 10.1093/geronb/58.1.P3.
64. Hoyt C.L. Women, men, and leadership: exploring the gender gap at the top. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2010, 4(7):484-498. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00274.x.
65. Hoyt C.L. Inspirational or self-deflating the role of self-efficacy in elite role model effectiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2013, 4(3):290-298. 10.1177/1948550612455066.
66. Hoyt C.L., Blascovich J. Leadership efficacy and women leaders' responses to stereotype activation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2007, 10(4):595-616. 10.1177/1368430207084718.
67. Hoyt C.L., Blascovich J. The role of leadership self-efficacy and stereotype activation on cardiovascular, behavioral and self-report responses in the leadership domain. The Leadership Quarterly 2010, 21(1):89-103. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.007.
68. Hoyt C.L., Burnette J.L., Innella A.N. I can do that. The impact of implicit theories on leadership role model effectiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2012, 38(2):257-268. 10.1177/0146167211427922.
69. Hoyt C.L., Chemers M.M. Social stigma and leadership: a long climb up a slippery ladder. Leadership at the crossroads: leadership and psychology 2008, vol. 1:165-180. Praeger, Westport, CT. C.L. Hoyt, G.R. Goethals, D.R. Forsyth (Eds.).
70. Hoyt C.L., Johnson S.K., Murphy S.E., Skinnell K.H. The impact of blatant stereotype activation and group sex-composition on female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly 2010, 21(5):716-732. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.003.
71. Hoyt C.L., Simon S. Female leaders injurious or inspiring role models for women?. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2011, 35(1):143-157. 10.1177/0361684310385216.
72. Inzlicht M., Ben-Zeev T. A threatening intellectual environment: why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science 2000, 11(5):365-371. 10.1111/1467-9280.00272.
73. Johnson S.K., Murphy S.E., Zewdie S., Reichard R.J. The strong, sensitive type: effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2008, 106(1):39-60. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002.
74. Kaiser C.R., Vick S.B., Major B. Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science 2006, 17(4):332-338. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x.
75. Kalokerinos E.K., von Hippel C., Zacher H. Is stereotype threat a useful construct for organizational psychology research and practice?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014, 7(3):381-402. 10.1111/iops.12167.
76. Kanter R.M. Men and women of the corporation 1977, Basic books, New York.
77. Kenney R.A., Schwartz-Kenney B.M., Blascovich J. Implicit leadership theories: defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1996, 22(11):1128-1143. 10.1177/01461672962211004.
78. Koenig A., Eagly A., Mitchell A., Ristikari T. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 2011, 137(4):616-642. 10.1037/a0023557.
79. Koenig A.M., Eagly A.H. Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity. Sex Roles 2005, 52(7/8):489-496. 10.1007/s11199-005-3714-x.
80. Kray L., Shirako A. Stereotype threat in organizations: an examination of its scope, triggers, and possible interventions. Stereotype threat: theory, process, and application 2011, 173-187. Oxford University Press, New York. M. Inzlicht, T. Schmader (Eds.).
81. Kray L.J., Galinsky A.D., Thompson L. Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: an exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 87(2):386-410. 10.1006/obhd.2001.2979.
82. Kray L.J., Haselhuhn M.P. What it takes to succeed: an examination of the relationship between negotiators' implicit beliefs and performance. Leadership at the crossroads: leadership and psychology 2008, vol. 1:213-229. Praeger, Westport, CT. C.L. Hoyt, G.R. Goethals, D.R. Forsyth (Eds.).
83. Kray L.J., Locke C.C., Haselhuhn M.P. In the words of Larry summers: gender stereotypes and implicit beliefs in negotiations. Neuroeconomics and the firm 2010, 101-115. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. A.A. Stanton, M. Day, I.M. Welpe (Eds.).
84. Kray L.J., Reb J., Galinsky A.D., Thompson L. Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: the effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30(4):399-411. 10.1177/0146167203261884.
85. Kray L.J., Thompson L., Galinsky A. Battle of the sexes: gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80(6):942-958. 10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.942.
86. Latu I.M., M.Schmid Mast, Lammers J., Bombari D. Successful female leaders empower women's behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2013, 49(3):444-448. 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003.
87. Lawless J., Fox R. Men rule: the continued under-representation of women in U.S. politics 2012, Women & Politics Institute, Washington, DC, (Retrieved from: https://www.american.edu/spa/wpi/upload/2012-Men-Rule-Report-web.pdf).
88. Leicht C., de Moura G.R., Crisp R.J. Contesting gender stereotypes stimulates generalized fairness in the selection of leaders. The Leadership Quarterly 2014, 25(5):1025-1039. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.001.
89. Leslie S.J., Cimpian A., Meyer M., Freeland E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 2015, 347(6219):262-265. 10.1126/science.1261375.
90. Levy B. Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71(6):1092-1107. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1092.
91. Livingston R.W., Rosette A.S., Washington E.F. Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science 2012, 23(4):354-358. 10.1177/0956797611428079.
92. Lockwood P., Kunda Z. Increasing the salience of one's best selves can undermine inspiration by outstanding role models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76(2):214-228. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.214.
93. Logel C., Walton G.M., Spencer S.J., Iserman E.C., von Hippel W., Bell A.E. Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96(6):1089-1103. 10.1037/a0015703.
94. Lord R.G., Maher K.J. Executive leadership and information processing: linking perceptions and organizational performance 1991, Unwin Hyman, Wellington, MA.
95. Major B., Schmader T. Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. Prejudice: the target's perspective 1998, 219-241. The Academic Press. J. Swim, C. Stangor (Eds.).
96. Marx D.M., Ko S.J., Friedman R.A. The "Obama effect": how a salient role model reduces race-based performance differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45(4):953-956. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.012.
97. Marx D.M., Roman J.S. Female role models: protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28(9):1183-1193. 10.1177/01461672022812004.
98. McGlone M.S., Aronson J., Kobrynowicz D. Stereotype threat and the gender gap in political knowledge. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2006, 30(4):392-398. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00314.x.
99. McGlone M.S., Pfeister R.A. Stereotype threat and the evaluative context of communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2015, 34(2):111-137. 10.1177/0261927X14562609.
100. McIntyre R.B., Lord C.G., Gresky D.M., Ten Eyck L.L., Frye G.D.J., Bond C.F. A social impact trend in the effects of role models on alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat. Current Research in Social Psychology 2005, 10(9):116-136.
101. McIntyre R.B., Paulson R.M., Lord C.G. Alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2003, 39(1):83-90. 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00513-9.
102. Murphy S.E. The contribution of leadership experience and self-efficacy to group performance under evaluation apprehension (order no. 9230410). 1992, Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304005264). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304005264?accountid=10673.
103. Murphy M.C., Steele C.M., Gross J.J. Signaling threat: how situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science 2007, 18:879-885. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x.
104. Nguyen H.H.D., Ryan A.M. Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93(6):1314-1134. 10.1037/a0012702.
105. Niederle M., Vesterlund L. Gender differences in competition. Negotiation Journal 2008, 24(4):447-463. 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00197.x.
106. Nussbaum A.D., Steele C.M. Situational disengagement and persistence in the face of adversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43(1):127-134. 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.007.
107. Parks-Stamm E.J., Heilman M.E., Hearns K.A. Motivated to penalize: women's strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34(2):237-247. 10.1177/0146167207310027.
108. Pew Research Center Social & Demographic Trends Women and leadership (Retrieved from). http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/01/14/chapter-1-women-in-leadership/.
109. Pollack J.M., Burnette J., Hoyt C. Self-efficacy in the face of threats to entrepreneurial success: mind-sets matter. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2012, 34(3):287-294. 10.1080/01973533.2012.674452.
110. Pronin E., Steele C.M., Ross L. Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: women and mathematics. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2004, 40(2):152-168. 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X.
111. Purdie-Vaughns V., Steele C., Davies P., Ditlmann R., Crosby J. Social identity contingencies: how diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94(4):615-630. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615.
112. Roberson L., Kulik C.T. Stereotype threat at work. Academy of Management Perspectives 2007, 21(2):24-40. 10.5465/AMP.2007.25356510.
113. Rosette A.S., Leonardelli G.J., Phillips K.W. The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93(4):758-777. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758.
114. Rosette A.S., Livingston R.W. Failure is not an option for Black women: effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012, 48(5):1162-1167. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002.
115. Rudman L., Glick P. Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77(5):1004-1010. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004.
116. Rudman L.A., Glick P. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57(4):743-762. 10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
117. Rudman L.A., Phelan J.E. The effect of priming gender roles on women's implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social Psychology 2010, 41(3):192-202. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000027.
118. Sanchez-Hucles J.V., Davis D.D. Women and women of color in leadership: complexity, identity, and intersectionality. American Psychologist 2010, 65(3):171-181. 10.1037/a0017459.
119. Schmader T. Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002, 38(2):194-201. 10.1006/jesp.2001.1500.
120. Schmader T., Johns M., Forbes C. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review 2008, 115(2):336-356. 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
121. Sekaquaptewa D., Thompson M. Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: their effects on women's performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2003, 39(1):68-74. 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5.
122. Shapiro J.R., Neuberg S.L. From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: implications of a multi-threat framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2007, 11(2):107-130. 10.1177/1088868306294790.
123. Shapiro J.R., Williams A.M. The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls' and women's performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 2012, 66(3):175-183. 10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0.
124. Shih M., Pittinsky T.L., Ambady N. Stereotype susceptibility: identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science 1999, 10(1):81-84. 10.1111/1467-9280.00111.
125. Simon S., Hoyt C.L. Exploring the effect of media images on women's leadership self-perceptions and aspirations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2012, 16(2):232-245. 10.1177/1368430212451176.
126. Small D., Gelfand M., Babcock L., Gettman H. Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93(4):600-613. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.600.
127. Spencer S.J., Steele C.M., Quinn D.M. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1999, 35(1):4-28. 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.
128. Stangor C., Carr C., Kiang L. Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75(5):1191-1197. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1191.
129. Steele C.M. A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 1997, 52(6):613-629. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.
130. Steele C.M., Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69(5):797-811. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.
131. Steele C.M., Spencer S.J., Aronson J. Contending with group image: the psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in experimental social psychology 2002, 34:379-440. Academic Press, New York. M. Zanna (Ed.).
132. Steele J.R., Ambady N. "Math is hard!" The effect of gender priming on women's attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 42(4):428-436. 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003.
133. Stone J., Lynch C.I., Sjomeling M., Darley J.M. Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77(6):1213-1227. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1213.
134. Sturm S. Second generation employment discrimination: a structural approach. Columbia Law Review 2001, 101(3):458-568. 10.2307/1123737.
135. Suls J., Martin R., Wheeler L. Social comparison: why, with whom, and with what effect?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11(5):159-163. 10.1111/1467-8721.00191.
136. Vault/MCCA Annual vault/MCAA Law Firm Diversity Survey 2013, Press release, Retrieved from http://www.vault.com/images/pdf/downloads/VaultMCCALawFirmDiversitySurvey_Sep2013_PR.pdf.
137. von Hippel C., Kalokerinos E., Henry J. Stereotype threat among older employees: relationship with job attitudes and turnover intentions. Psychology and Aging 2013, 28(1):17-27. 10.1037/a0029825.
138. von Hippel C., Issa M., Ma R., Stokes A. Stereotype threat: antecedents and consequences for working women. European Journal of Social Psychology 2011, 41(2):151-161. 10.1002/ejsp.749.
139. von Hippel C., Sekaquaptewa D., McFarlane M. Stereotype threat among women in finance: negative effects on identity, workplace well-being, and recruiting. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2015, 39(3):405-414. 10.1177/0361684315574501.
140. von Hippel C., Walsh A.M., Zouroudis A. Identity separation in response to stereotype threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2011, 2(3):317-324. 10.1177/1948550610390391.
141. von Hippel C., Wiryakusuma C., Bowden J., Shochet M. Stereotype threat and female communication styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011, 37(10):1312-1324. 10.1177/0146167211410439.
142. Walton G., Cohen G. A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92(1):82-96. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82.
143. Walton G.M., Murphy M.C., Ryan A.M. Stereotype threat in organizations: implications for equity and performance. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2015, 2(1):523-550. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322.
144. Wayne N., Vermillion M., Uijtdehaage S. Gender differences in leadership amongst first-year medical students in the small-group setting. Academic Medicine 2010, 85(8):1276-1281. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e5f2ce.
145. Williams J. Hacking tech's diversity problem. Harvard Business Review Magazine 2014, October, (Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/10/hacking-techs-diversity-problem/ar/1).
146. Williams J.E., Best D.L. Sex and psyche: gender and self viewed cross-culturally 1990, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
147. Wood J.V. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin 1989, 106(2):231-248. 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231.
148. World Economic Forum The global gender gap report 2014, 2014. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2014/.