The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls' and Women's Performance and Interest in STEM Fields

Sex Roles

Volumn 66, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 175-183

  Shapiro, Jenessa R ^a,b   Williams, Amy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender stereotypes; Math attitudes; Multi Threat Framework; STEM; Stereotype threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856537309     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When white men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29-46. doi: 10. 1006/jesp. 1998. 1371.
2. Beilock, S. L. (2008). Math performance in stressful situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 339-343. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8721. 2008. 00602. x.
3. Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136, 256-276. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 136. 2. 256.
4. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the United States of America, 107, 1860-1863. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0910967107.
5. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Psychological Science, 16, 572-578. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2005. 01577. x.
6. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045-1060. doi: 10. 1037/a0016239.
7. Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women's anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10. 1177/1948550611405218.
8. Danaher, K., & Crandall, C. S. (2008). Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1639-1655. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1559-1816. 2008. 00362. x.
9. Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642-658. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2004. 02. 003.
10. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628. doi: 10. 1177/014616702237644.
11. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276-287. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 88. 2. 276.
12. Frantz, C. M., Cuddy, A. J. C., Burnett, M., Ray, H., & Hart, A. (2004). A threat in the computer: The race implicit association test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1611-1624. doi: 10. 1177/0146167204266650.
13. Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91-107. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 94. 1. 91.
14. Good, C., & Aronson, J. (1998). Stereotypes in the calculus classroom: Men's and women's perceptions of sex-differences. Unpublished data. The University of Texas at Austin.
15. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 17-28. doi: 10. 1016/j. appdev. 2007. 10. 004.
16. Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-011-9996-2.
17. Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2007). Stereotype threat among school girls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 545-560. doi: 10. 1037/0022-0663. 99. 3. 545.
18. Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2009). Counter-stereotypic beliefs in math do not protect school girls from stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1024-1027. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2009. 04. 029.
19. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2009. 04. 029.
20. Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2007). Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 544-564. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 93. 4. 544.
21. Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2009). The effect of stereotype threat on the solving of quantitative GRE problems: A mere effort interpretation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1301-1314. doi: 10. 1177/0146167209335165.
22. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175-179. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2005. 00799. x.
23. Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 137, 691-705. doi: 10. 1037/a0013834.
24. Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women's performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371-381. doi: 10. 1177/0146167202250218.
25. Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942-958. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 80. 6. 942.
26. Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092-1107. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 71. 6. 1092.
27. Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 990-997. doi: 10. 1007/s10508-008-9460-8.
28. Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1089-1103. doi: 10. 1037/a0015703.
29. Maass, A., D'Ettole, C., & Cadinu, M. (2008). Checkmate? The role of gender stereotypes in the ultimate intellectual sport. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 231-245. doi: 10. 1002/ejsp. 440.
30. Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., & Schimel, J. (2006). Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women's intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 236-243. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2005. 04. 010.
31. Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183-1193. doi: 10. 1177/01461672022812004.
32. Marx, D. M., Stapel, D. A., & Muller, D. (2005). We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 432-446. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 88. 3. 432.
33. McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486-493. doi: 10. 1016/j. appdev. 2006. 06. 003.
34. McGlone, M. S., Aronson, J., & Kobrynowicz, D. (2006). Stereotype threat and the gender gap in political knowledge. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 392-398. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1471-6402. 2006. 00314. x.
35. McIntyre, R. B., Paulson, R. N., & Lord, C. G. (2003). Alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 83-90. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-1031(02)00513-9.
36. Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330, 1234-1237. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1195996.
37. Muzzatti, B., & Agnoli, F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology, 43, 747-759. doi: 10. 1037/0012-1649. 43. 3. 747.
38. Neuville, E., & Croizet, J.-C. (2007). Can salience of gender identity impair math performance among 7-8 years old girls? The moderating role of task difficulty. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 307-316. doi: 10. 1007/BF03173428.
39. Quinn, D. M., Kahng, S. K., & Crocker, J. (2004). Discreditable: Stigma effects of revealing a mental illness history on test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 803-815. doi: 10. 1177/0146167204264088.
40. Rosenthal, H. E. S., & Crisp, R. J. (2006). Reducing stereotype threat by blurring intergroup boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 501-511. doi: 10. 1177/0146167205281009.
41. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 949-966. doi: 10. 1037/a0014846.
42. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201. doi: 10. 1006/jesp. 2001. 1500.
43. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 85. 3. 440.
44. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women's experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835-850. doi: 10. 1023/B: SERS. 0000029101. 74557. a0.
45. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336-356. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 115. 2. 336.
46. Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women's performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68-74. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5.
47. Shapiro, J. R. (2011). Different groups, different threats: A multi-threat approach to the experience of stereotype threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 464-480. doi: 10. 1177/0146167211398140.
48. Shapiro, J. R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2007). From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a Multi-Threat Framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 107-130. doi: 10. 1177/1088868306294790.
49. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00111.
50. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28. doi: 10. 1006/jesp. 1998. 1373.
51. Stangor, C., Carr, C., & Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1191-1197. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 75. 5. 1191.
52. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 21 (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York: Academic.
53. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629. doi: 10. 1037/0003-066X. 52. 6. 613.
54. Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). "Math is hard!" The effect of gender priming on women's attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 428-436. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2005. 06. 003.
55. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 697-711. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 69. 5. 797.
56. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440.
57. Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. doi: 10. 1037/a0021385.
58. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456-467. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2.
59. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82-96. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 92. 1. 82.
60. Walton, G. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20, 1132-1139. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2009. 02417. x.
61. Wout, D. A., Shih, M. J., Jackson, J. S., & Sellers, R. M. (2009). Targets as perceivers: How people determine when they will be negatively stereotyped. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 349-362. doi: 10. 1037/a0012880.