Advances in the Science of Performance Appraisal: Implications for Practice

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2006

Volumn 21, Issue , 2008, Pages 295-337

  Latham, Gary P ^a   Mann, Sara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Australia; Counseling psychology; Legal issues; North American organizations; Performance appraisal

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948731811     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470696378.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (213)

1. Albright, M.D. & Levy, P.E. (1995). The effects of source credibility and performance rating discrepancy on reactions to multiple raters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 577-600.
2. Antonioni, D. (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 349-356.
3. Aronson, E. (1999a). The social animal (8th edn). New York: Freeman.
4. Aronson, E. (1999b). The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54, 875-884.
5. Aronson, E., Fried, C., & Stone, J. (1991). Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1636-1638.
6. Arvey, R.D. & Murphy, K.R. (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 141-168.
7. Atkins, P.W.B. & Wood, R.E. (2002). Self- versus others' ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology, 55, 871-904.
8. Atwater, L., Ostroff, C., Yammarino, F.J., & Fleenor, J.W. (1998). Self-other agreement:Does it really matter? Personnel Psychology, 51, 577-598.
9. Atwater, L., Roush, P., & Fischthal, A. (1995). The influence of upward feedback on self- and follower ratings of leadership. Personnel Psychology, 48, 35-59.
10. Atwater, L.E. & Waldman, D.A. (1998, May). Accountability in 360 degree feedback. HR Magazine, 96-104.
11. Bailey, C. & Fletcher, C. (2002). The impact of multiple source feedback on management development: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 853-867.
12. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. New York: Freeman.
13. Bannister, B.D. (1986). Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback:Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 203-210.
14. Bartol, K.M. (1999). Gender influences on performance evaluations. In G.N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Bartol, K.M., Durham, C.C., & Poon, J.M.L. (2001). Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1106-1119.
16. Baum, J.R., Locke E.A., & Smith, K.G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 292-303.
17. Beehr, T.A., Ivanitskaya, L., Hansen, C.P., Erofeev, D., & Gudanowski, D.M. (2001). Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 775-788.
18. Bennington, L. & Roberts-Calvert, B. (1998). Antidiscrimination legislation and HRM practice. In M. Patrickson & L. Hartmann (Eds), Managing an ageing workforce. Sydney, Australia: Woodslane Publishing.
19. Bennington, L. & Wein, R. (2000). Anti-discrimination legislation in Australia: Fair, effective, efficient or irrelevant? International Journal of Manpower, 21, 21-33.
20. Bernardin, H.J. (2005). Behavioral observation scales. In S. Cartwirght (Ed.), Human resource management.V: The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management (2nd edn). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
21. Bernardin, H.J., Cooke, D.K., & Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 232-234.
22. Bernichon, T., Cook, K.E., & Brown, J.D. (2003). Seeking self-evaluative feedback:The interactive role of global self-esteem and specific self-views. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 194-204.
23. Bettenhausen, K.L. & Fedor, D.B. (1997). Peer and upward appraisals: A comparison of their benefits and problems. Group and Organization Management, 22, 236-263.
24. Biernat, M., Crandall, C.S., Young, L.V., Kobrynowicz, D., & Halpin, S.M. (1998). All that you can be: Stereotyping of self and others in a military context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 301-317.
25. Boldry, J., Wood, W., & Kashy, D.A. (2001). Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 689-705.
26. Bommer, W.H., Johnson, J.L., Rich, G.A., Podsakoff, P.M., & MacKenzie, S.B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance:A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 48, 587.
27. Bordin, E.S. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance. Psychotherapy:Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252-260.
28. Borman, W.C. (1997). 360° ratings: An analysis of assumptions and a research agenda for evaluating their validity. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 299, 315.
29. Borman, W.C., Buck, D.E., Hanson, M.A., Motowidlo, S.J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.
30. Boswell, W.R. & Boudreau, J.W. (2002). Separating the developmental and evaluative performance appraisal uses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 391-412.
31. Bowen, C.C., Swim, J.K., & Jacobs, R.R. (2000). Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2194-2215.
32. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.
33. Bowman, J.S. (1999). Performance appraisal: Verisimilitude trumps veracity. Public Personnel Management, 28, 557-594.
34. Bozeman, D.P. (1997). Interrater agreement in multi-source performance appraisal: A commentary. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 313-316.
35. Bracken, D.W., Timmreck, C.W., & Church, A.H. (Eds) (2001). The handbook of multisource feedback. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Brett, J.F. & Atwater, L.E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930-942.
37. Brown, T.C. (2003). The effect of verbal self-guidance training on collective efficacy and team performance. Personnel Psychology, 56, 935-964.
38. Brown, T.C. & Latham, G.P. (2002). The effects of behavioural outcome goals, learning goals, and urging people to do their best on an individual's teamwork behaviour in a group problem solving task. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 276-285.
39. Brown, T.C. & Latham, G.P. (in press). The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on performance effectiveness in a MBA program. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science.
40. Brutus, S. & Derayeh, M. (2002). Multisource assessment programs in organizations:An insider's perspective. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 187-202.
41. Campbell, J.D., Garfinkel, R.B., & Moses, L. (1996). Strategies for success in measuring performance. HR Magazine, 41, 98.
42. Cardy, R.L. & Keefe, T.J. (1994). Observational purpose and evaluative articulation in frame-of-reference training: The effects of alternative processing modes on rating accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 338-357.
43. Cawley, B.D., Keeping, L.M., & Levy, P.E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615-631.
44. Cederblom, D. & Permerl, D.E. (2002). From performance appraisal to performance management. One agency's experience. Public Personnel Management, 31, 131-140.
45. Church, A.H. (2000). Do higher performing managers actually receive better ratings? A validation of multirater assessment methodology. Consulting Psychology Journal:Practice and Research, 52, 99-116.
46. Cialdini, R.B. (2001). The science of persuasion. Scientific American, 284, 76-81.
47. Claus, L. (2003). Similarities and differences in human resource management in the European Union. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45, 729-755.
48. Cohen, S.G. & Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
49. Conway, J.M. (1996). Analysis and design of multitrait-multirater performance appraisal studies. Journal of Management, 22, 139-162.
50. Conway, J.M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3-13.
51. Cronshaw, S.F. (1998). Job analysis: Changing nature of work. Canadian Psychology, 39, 5-13.
52. DeNisi, A.S. & Kluger, A.N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive, 14, 129-139.
53. DeNisi, A.S. & Peters, L.H. (1996). Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 717-737.
54. DeVoe, S.E. & Iyengar, S.S. (2003). Managers' theories of subordinates: A crosscultural examination of manager perceptions of motivation and appraisal of performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 47-61.
55. Dewberry, C. (2001). Performance disparities between whites and ethnic minorities:Real differences of assessment bias? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 656-673.
56. Dickerson, C.A., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E., & Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841-854.
57. Dominick, P.G., Reilly, R.R., & McGourty, J.W. (1997). The effects of peer feedback on team member behaviour. Group and Organization Management, 22, 508-520.
58. Dorner, D. (1991). The investigation of action regulation in uncertain and complex situations. In J. Rassmussen, G. Brehmer, & J. Leplat (Eds), Distributed decision making:Cognitive models for cooperative work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
59. Druskat, V.U. & Wolff, S.B. (1999). Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 58-74.
60. Dweck, C.S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
61. Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J., & Makhijani, M.G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
62. Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonsky, B.G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
63. Ellinger, A.D., Watkins, K.E., & Bostrom, R.P. (1999). Managers as facilitators of learning in learning organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 105-125.
64. Ellis, A. (1999). Early theories and practices of rational emotive behaviour therapy and how they have been augmented and revised during the last three decades. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 17, 69-93.
65. Emery, F.E. & Thorsrud, E. (1976). Democracy at work. Leiden, The Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff.
66. Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M.L., & Liden, R.C. (2001). Procedural justice as a twodimensional construct: An examination in the performance appraisal account. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37 (2), 205-222.
67. Erez, M. (1994). Toward a model of cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H.C. Triandis & M.D. Dunnette (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 559-607). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
68. Erez, M.E., Kaplan, E., & Van-Dijk, D. (2004). Goal setting and regulatory focus: An integrative approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago.
69. Erikson, A. & Allen, T. (2003). Linking 360o feedback to business outcome measures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
70. Facteau, J.D. & Craig, S.B. (2001). Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 215-227.
71. Feild, H.S. & Holley, W.H. (1982). The relationship of performance appraisal system characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 392-406.
72. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
73. Fitzsimons, G. & Shah, J.Y. (2005). Instrumentality yours: How goal pursuits automatically affect social relations. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
74. Fletcher, C. (1997). Self-awareness-A neglected attribute in selection and assessment? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 183-187.
75. Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473-487.
76. Fletcher, C. & Perry, E.L. (2001). Performance appraisal and feedback: A consideration of national culture and a review of contemporary research and future trends. In N.D. Anderson et al. (Eds), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology. London: Sage.
77. Fox, S., Ben-Nahum, Z., & Yinnon, Y. (1989). Perceived similarity and accuracy of peer ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 781-786.
78. Fraley, R.C., Garner, J.P., & Shaver, P.R. (2000). Adult attachment and the defensive regulation of attention and memory: Examining the role of preemptive and postemptive defensive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 816-826.
79. Freid, Y., Levi, A.S., Ben-David, H.A., Tiegs, R.B., & Avital, N. (2000). Rater positive and negative mood predispositions as predictors of performance ratings of ratees in simulated and real organizational settings. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 73, 373-378.
80. Frese, M. (2005). Grand theories and midrange theories. Cultural effects on theorizing and the attempt to understand active approaches to work. In K.G. Smith & M. Hitt (Eds), The Oxford handbook of management theory: The process of theory development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81. Frese, M. & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H.C. Triandis, M.D. Dunnette, & L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd edn). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
82. Funderburg, S.A. & Levy, P.E. (1997). The influence of individual and contextual variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes. Group and Organization Management, 22 (2), 210-235.
83. Gabris, G.T. & Ihrke, D.M. (2001). Does performance appraisal contribute to heightened levels of employee burnout? The results of one study. Public Personnel Management, 30, 157-172.
84. General Electric Company (2000). GE 2000 Annual Report.
85. Ghorpade, J. (2000). Managing five paradoxes of 360-degree feedback. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 140-151.
86. Gilbert, G.R., Hannan, E.L., & Lowe, K.B. (1998). Is smoking stigma clouding the objectivity of employee performance appraisal? Public Personnel Management, 27 (3), 285-300.
87. Goodman, J.S., Wood, R.E., & Hendrickx, M. (2004). Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 248-262.
88. Gordon, R.A. & Arvey, R.D. (2004). Age bias in laboratory and field settings: A metaanalytic investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 468-492.
89. Greenberg, J. (2000). Promote procedural justice to enhance acceptance of work outcomes. In E. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
90. Greguras, G.J. & Robie, C. (1998). A new look at within-source interrater reliability of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 960-968.
91. Greguras, G.J., Robie, C., Schleicher, D.J., & Goff, M. (2003). A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multi-source ratings. Personnel Psychology, 56, 1-21.
92. Hall, D.T., Otazo, K.L., & Hollenbeck, G.P. (1999). Behind closed doors: What really happens in executive coaching. Organizational Dynamics, 27, 39-53.
93. Halperin, K., Snyder, C.R., Shenkel, R.J., & Houston, B.K. (1976). Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 85-88.
94. Head, T., Haug, R., Krabbenhoft, A., & Ma, C. (2000). Issues and trends in international business law: Implications for OD consultants. Organization Development Journal, 18, 62-73.
95. Hedge, J.W. & Teachout, M.S. (2000). Exploring the concept of acceptability as a criterion for evaluating performance measures. Group and Organization Management, 25, 22-44.
96. Heslin, P. & Latham, G.P. (2004). The effect of upward feedback on managerial behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 23-38.
97. Heslin, P.A., Latham, G.P., & VandeWalle, D. (2005). Implicit person theory and performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 842-856.
98. Heslin, P.A., VandeWalle, D., & Latham, G.P. (2005). Keen to help: Managers implicit person theory and their subsequent employee coaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu.
99. Higgins, E.T. (1999). Persons or situations: Unique explanatory principles or variability in general principles? In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds), The coherence of personality:Social cognitive biases of consistency, variability and organization (pp. 61-93). New York:Guilford Press.
100. Hovland, C. & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
101. Jain, H.C., Sloan, P.J., & Horowitz, F.M. (2003). Employment equity and affirmative action: An international comparison. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
102. Jawahar, I.M. (2001). Attitudes, self-monitoring and appraisal behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 875-883.
103. Jelley, R.B. & Goffin, R.D. (2001). Can performance-feedback accuracy be improved? Effects of rater priming and rating-scale format on rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 134-144.
104. Johnson, D.E., Erez, A., Kiker, D.S., & Motowidlo, S.J. (2002). Liking and attributions of motives as mediators of the relationships between individuals' reputations, helpful behaviors and raters' reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 808-815.
105. Kalinauckas, P. & King, H. (1995). Coaching gets to parts that other methods cannot reach. People Management, 1, 51.
106. Kane, J.S., Bernardin, H.J., Villanova, P., & Peyrefitte, J. (1995). Stability of rater leniency: Three studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1036-1051.
107. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct, 134-147.
108. Keown-Gerrard, J.A. & Sulsky, L.M. (2001). The effects of task information training and frame-of-reference training with situational constraints on rating accuracy. Human Performance, 14, 305-320.
109. Klein, H.J., Wesson, M.J., Hollenbeck, J.R., & Alge, B.J. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 885-896.
110. Kleingeld, A., Van Tuijl, H., & Algera, J.A. (2004). Participation in the design of performance management systems: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 831-851.
111. Kluger, A.N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance:A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
112. Komaki, J.L. & Desselles, M.L. (1994). Supervision reexamined: The role of monitors and consequences. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
113. Korsgaard, M.A., Meglino, B.M., & Lester, S.W. (2004). The effect of other orientation on self-supervisor rating agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 873-891.
114. Korsgaard, M.A., Roberson, L., & Rymph, R.D. (1998). What motivates fairness? The role of subordinate assertive behavior on manager's interactional fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (5), 731-744.
115. Kraiger, K. & Ford, J.K. (1985). A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56-65.
116. Lam, S.S.K. & Schaubroeck, J. (1999). Total quality management and performance appraisal: An experimental study of process versus results and group versus individual approaches. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 445-457.
117. Lam, S.S.K., Yik, M.S.M., & Schaubroeck, J. (2002). Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback: The role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 192-201.
118. Lance, C.E. (1994). Test of a latent structure of performance ratings derived from Wherry's (1952) theory of ratings. Journal of Management, 20, 757-771.
119. Landau, J. (1995). The relationship of race and gender to managers' ratings of promotion potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 391-400.
120. Langan-Fox, J., Waycott, J., Morizzi, M., & McDonald, L. (1998). Predictors of participation in performance appraisal: A voluntary system in a blue-collar work environment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6 (4), 249-260.
121. Latham, G.P. (1986). Job performance and appraisal. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds), Review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
122. Latham, G.P. (2001). The importance of understanding and changing employee outcome expectancies for gaining commitment to an organizational goal. Personnel Psychology, 54, 707-716.
123. Latham, G.P. & Budworth, M. (2005, April). Anchoring the subsequent appraisal of others on one's own performance appraisal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, California.
124. Latham, G.P. & Heslin. P. (2003). Training the trainee as well as the trainer: Lessons to be learned from clinical psychology. Canadian Psychology, 44, 218-231.
125. Latham, G.P. & Latham, S.D. (2000). Overlooking theory and research in performance appraisal at one's peril: Much done, more to do. In C. Cooper & E.A. Locke (Eds), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
126. Latham, G.P., Locke, E.A., & Fassina, N.E. (2002). The high performance cycle: Standing the test of time. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), The psychological management of individual performance: A handbook in the psychology of management in organizations (pp. 201-228). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
127. Latham, G.P. & McCauley, C.D. (2005). Leadership in the private sector: Yesterday versus tomorrow. In C. Cooper (Ed.), The twenty-first century manager. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
128. Latham, G.P. & Pinder, C.C. (2005).Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485-516.
129. Latham, G.P. & Seijts, G.H. (1997). The effect of appraisal instrument on managerial perceptions of fairness and satisfaction with appraisals from their peers. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 275-282.
130. Latham, G.P. & Seijts, G.H. (1999). The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 421-429.
131. Latham, G.P., Skarlicki, D., Irvine, D., & Siegel, J. (1993). The increasing importance of performance appraisals to employee effectiveness in organizational settings in North America. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 87-132). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
132. Latham, G.P. & Wexley, K.N. (1994). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal (2nd edn). Reading, MA: Wesley.
133. Latham, G.P., Wexley, K.N., & Pursell, E.D. (1975). Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 550-555.
134. Lefkowitz, J. (2000). The role of interpersonal affective regard in supervisory performance ratings: A literature review and proposed causal model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 67-85.
135. Lefkowitz, J. & Battista, M. (1995). Potential sources of criterion bias in supervisor ratings used for test validation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 389-414.
136. LePine, J.A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D.E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52-65.
137. Levy, P.E. & Williams, J.R. (1998). The role of perceived system knowledge in predicting appraisal reactions, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 53-65.
138. Locke, E.A. & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
139. Locke, E.A. & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
140. London, M. & Smither, J.W. (1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theorybased applications and directions for research. Personnel Psychology, 48, 803-839.
141. London, M., Smither, J.W., & Adsit, D.J. (1997). Accountability: The Achilles' heel of multisource feedback. Group and Organization Management, 22, 162-184.
142. Luthans, F. & Peterson, S.J. (2003). 360-degree feedback with systematic coaching:empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resource Management, 42, 243-256.
143. Mann, S.L. & Budworth, M.H. (2005). Self and peer rater agreement of counterproductive performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.
144. Markus, H.R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
145. Martin, D., Bartol, K., & Kehoe, P. (2000). The legal ramifications of performance appraisal: The growing significance. Public Personnel Management, 29, 379-406.
146. Maurer, T.J., Mitchell, D.R.D., & Barbeite, F.G. (2002). Predictors of attitudes toward a 360° feedback system and involvement in post-feedback management development activity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 87-107.
147. Mayer, R.C. & Davis, J.H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136.
148. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press.
149. Miller, J.S. & Cardy, R.L. (2000). Self-monitoring and performance appraisal: Rating outcomes in project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 609-626.
150. Millman, Z. & Latham, G.P. (2001). Increasing reemployment through training in verbal self-guidance. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
151. Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
152. Nease, A.A., Mudgett, B.O., & Quinones, M.A. (1999). Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 806-814.
153. Noonan, L.E. & Sulsky, L.M. (2001). Impact of frame-of-reference training on alternative training effectiveness criteria in a Canadian military sample. Human Performance, 14, 3-26.
154. Northcraft, G.B. & Earley, P.C. (1989). Technology, credibility, and feedback use. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 83-96.
155. O'Leary-Kelly, A., Martocchio, J., & Frink, D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285-1301.
156. Olivero, G., Bane, K.D., & Kopelman, R.E. (1997). Executive coaching as a transfer of training tool: Effects on productivity in a public agency. Public Personnel Management, 26, 461-469.
157. Organ, D. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85-98.
158. Ostroff, C., Atwater, L.E., & Feinberg, B.J. (2004). Understanding self-other agreement:A look at rater and ratee characteristics, context and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57, 333-375.
159. Pazy, A. & Oron, I. (2001). Sex proportion and performance evaluation among highranking military officers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 689-702.
160. Pelletier, L.G. & Vallerand, R.J. (1996). Supervisors' beliefs and subordinates' intrinsic motivation: A behavioral confirmation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 331-340.
161. Pettijohn, C.E., Pettijohn, L.S., & d'Amico, M. (2001). Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 127-146.
162. Pratkanis, A. & Aronson, E. (2001). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York: Freeman.
163. Reilly, R.R., Smither, J.W., & Vasilopoulos, N.L. (1996). A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Personnel Psychology, 49, 599-612.
164. Renn, R.W. (2003). Moderation by goal commitment of the feedback-performance relationship: Theoretical explanation and preliminary study. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 561-580.
165. Richardson, L. (1998). Five-minute sales coaching. Training and Development, 52, 53-57.
166. Rotundo, M. & Sackett, P.R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policycapturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66-80.
167. Saks, A.M. & Waldman, D.A. (1998). The relationship between age and job performance evaluations for entry-level professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 409-419.
168. Salter, J.S. (1996). Officer attitude and opinion survey: Career management and job performance issues. Australian Army First Psychological Research Unit Report, May, 20.
169. Schleicher, D.J. & Day, D.V. (1998). A cognitive evaluation of framework-of-reference rater training: Content and process issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 76-101.
170. Scholz, U., Dona, B.G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242-251.
171. Schrader, B.W. & Steiner, D.D. (1996). Common comparison standards: An approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 813-820.
172. Scullen, S.E., Bergey, P.K., & Aiman-Smith, L. (2005). Forced distribution rating systems and their improvement of workforce potential: A baseline simulation. Personnel Psychology, 58, 1-32.
173. Scullen, S.E., Mount, M.K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (6), 956-970.
174. Seifert, C.F., Yukl, G., & McDonald, R.A. (2003). Effects of multi-source feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 561-569.
175. Seijts, G.H. & Latham, G.P. (2001). The effect of learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 291-307.
176. Seijts, G.H. & Latham, G.P. (2005) Learning versus performance goals: When should each be used? Academy of Management Executive, 19, 124-131.
177. Seijts, G.H., Latham, G.P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B.W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227-239.
178. Seligman, M.E.P. (1998). Learned optimism. New York: Pocket Books.
179. Shah, J. (2003a). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661-681.
180. Shah, J. (2003b). The motivational looking glass: Howsignificant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 424-439.
181. Shah, J.Y. (2005). The automatic pursuit and management of goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 10-13.
182. Smither, J.W., London, M., Flautt, R., Vargas, Y., & Kucine, I. (2003). Can working with an executive coach improve multisource feedback ratings over time? A quasiexperimental field study. Personnel Psychology, 56, 23-44.
183. Smither, J.W., London, M., & Reilly, R.R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 33-66.
184. Smither, J.W., London, M., Vasilopoulos, N.L., Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.E., & Salvemini, N. (1995). An examination of the effects of an upward feedback program over time. Personnel Psychology, 48, 1-34.
185. Smither, J.W. & Walker, A.G. (2004). Are the characteristics of narrative comments related to improvement in multirater feedback ratings over time? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 575-581.
186. Steers, R.M. & Sanchez-Runde, C.J. (2002). Culture, motivation, and work behavior. In M.J. Gannon and K.L. Newman (Eds), The Blackwell handbook of principles of cross-cultural management. Bodmin, UK: MPG Books.
187. Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A.L., Winslow, M.P., & Fried, C.B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116-128.
188. Strauss, J.P., Barrick, M., & Connerley, M. (2001). An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74 (5), 637-657.
189. Sue-Chan, C. & Latham, G.P. (2004). The relative effectiveness of external, peer and self-coaches. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 260-278.
190. Sulsky, L.M. & Keown, J.L. (1998). Performance appraisal in the changing world of work: Implications for the meaning and measurement ofwork performance. Canadian Psychology, 39 (1-2), 52-59.
191. Taylor, M.S., Tracy, K.B., Renard, M.K., Harrison, J.K., & Carroll, S.J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495-523.
192. Trist, E.L. (1977). Collaboration in work settings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13, 268-278.
193. Tyler, K. (1997). Prepare managers to become career coaches. HRMagazine, 42, 98-101.
194. Tziner, A. (1999). The relationship between distal and proximal factors and the use of political considerations in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 217-231.
195. Tziner, A., Joannis, C., & Murphy, K.R. (2000). A comparison of three models of performance appraisal with regard to goal properties, goal perception and ratee satisfaction. Group and Organization Management, 25, 175-190.
196. Tziner, A. & Kopelman, R.E. (2002). Is there a preferred performance rating format? A non-psychometric perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 479-503.
197. Tziner, A., Latham, G.P., Price, B.S., & Haccoun, R. (1996). Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring perceived political considerations in performance appraisal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 179-190.
198. Tziner, A., Murphy, K.R., & Cleveland, J.N. (2001). Relationships between attitudes towards organizations and performance appraisal systems and rating behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 226-239.
199. Uggerslev, K.L. & Sulsky, L.M. (2002). Presentation modality and indirect performance information: Effects on ratings, reaction and memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 940-950.
200. Van Scotter, J.R. & Motowidlo, S.J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.
201. Varma, A., DeNisi, A.S., & Peters, L.H. (1996). Interpersonal affect and performance appraisal: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 49, 341-361.
202. Walker, A.G. & Smither, J.W. (1999). A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychology, 52, 393-423.
203. Watson Wyatt (2002). Human Capital Index: Human capital as a lead indicator of shareholder value. Washington, DC: Author.
204. Wayne, S.J. & Liden, R.C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232-260.
205. Weisband, S. & Atwater, L. (1999). Evaluating self and others in electronic and faceto- face groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (4), 632-639.
206. Welch, J. & Byrne, J.A. (2001). Jack: Straight from the gut. New York: Watner Books.
207. Werner, J.M. & Bolino, M.C. (1997). Explaining US courts of appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1-24.
208. Winters, D. & Latham, G.P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 236-250.
209. Woehr, D.J. & Huffcutt, A.I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189-205.
210. Woodford, K. & Maes, J.D. (2002). Employee performance evaluations: Administering and writing them correctly in the multi-national setting. Equal Opportunities International, 21, 1-8.
211. Zagona, S.V. & Harter, R. (1966). Credibility of source and recipient's attitude: Factors in the perception and retention of information on smoking behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 155-168.
212. Zazanis, M.M., Zaccaco, S.J., & Kilcullen, R.N. (2001). Identifying motivation and interpersonal performance using peer evaluations. Military Psychology, 13, 73-88.
213. Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 261-276.