Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 3-13

  Conway, James M ^a  

^a CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033241290     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. * Albrecht, P. A., Glaser, E. M., & Marks, J. (1964). Validation of a multiple-assessment procedure for managerial personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 351-360.
2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
3. Borman, W. C., & Brush, D. H. (1993). More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Human Performance, 6, 1-21.
4. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997a). Introduction: Organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 67-69.
6. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997b). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
7. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168-177.
8. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. * Center for Creative Leadership. (1997). [360-degree feedback ratings.] Unpublished raw data.
10. Conway, J. M. (1996). Analysis and design of multitrait-multirater performance appraisal studies. Journal of Management, 22, 139-162.
11. Conway, J. M. (1998). Estimation and uses of the proportion of method variance for multitrait-mnltimethod data. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 209-222.
12. Conway, J. M., & Huffcult, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multi-source performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10, 331-360.
13. Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1987). Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 315-318.
14. Dickinson, T. L., Hassett, C. E., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1986, December). Work performance ratings: A meta-analysis of multitrait-multimethod studies (AFHRL-TP-86-32), Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
15. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10, 153-170.
16. Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
17. * Heneman, H. G., III (1974). Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 638-642.
18. * Holzbach, R. L. (1978). Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 579-588.
19. Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
20. * Lawler, E. E., III (1967). The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 369-381.
21. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
22. * Malka, S. (1990). Application of the multitrait-multirater approach to performance appraisal in social service organizations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 243-250.
23. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361.
24. * Morgan, R. B. (1993). Self- and co-worker perceptions of ethics and their relationships to leadership and salary. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 200-214.
25. Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83.
26. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
27. * Mount, M. K. (1984). Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Personnel Psychology, 37, 687-702.
28. * Mount, M. K., Judge, T. A., Scullen, S. E., Sytsma, M. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (1997, April). Trait, rater, and level effects in 360-degree performance ratings. Paper presented at the 12th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
29. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85-97.
32. * Orpen, C. (1973). An empirical assessment of the job performance of high-level executives by means of a multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychologia Africana, 15, 7-14.
33. * Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E., III (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
34. * Rosse, J. G., & Kraut, A. I. (1983). Reconsidering the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56, 63-71.
35. * Schmitt, N., & Saari, B. B. (1978). Behavior, situation, and rater variance in descriptions of leader behaviors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 483-495.
36. * Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K., II. (1984). Self-appraisal based upon supervisory feedback. Personnel Psychology, 37, 667-685.
37. Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.
38. Viswesvaran, C. (1993). Modeling job performance: Is there a general factor? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
39. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 43, 865-885.
40. Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.
41. Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.