Attitudes, self-monitoring, and appraisal behaviors

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 875-883

  Jawahar, I M ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PERSONALITY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF EVALUATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSONALITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 85047683767     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.875     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Azjen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior: Some unresolved issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
4. Azjen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Ajzen, I., Timko, C., & White, J. B. (1982). Self-monitoring and the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 426-435.
6. Bernardin, H. J., & Orban, J. A. (1990). Leniency effect as a function of rating format, purpose of appraisal, and rater individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 5, 197-211.
7. Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (1986). Performance appraisal. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 43-62). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
8. Borman, W. C. (1977). Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 238-252.
9. Borman, W. C., & Hallam, G. L. (1991). Observation accuracy for assessors of work-sample performance: Consistency across task and individual-differences correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 11-18.
10. Bretz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321-352.
11. Caldwell, D., & O'Reilly, C. (1982a). Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 124-127.
12. Caldwell, D., & O'Reilly, C. (1982b). Responses to failure: The effects of choice and responsibility on impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 121-136.
13. Cleveland, J. N., & Murphy, K. R. (1992). Analyzing performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. In G. Ferris & K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 10, pp. 121-185). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130-135.
15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Cronbach, L. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 59, 177-193.
18. Dobbins, G. H., Farh, J., & Werbel, J. D. (1993). The influence of self-monitoring on inflation of grade-point averages for research and selection purposes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 321-334.
19. Fandt, P. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 140-158.
20. Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (1985). "To carve nature at its joints": On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317-349.
21. Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (1991). Taxonomic analysis redux: Some statistical considerations for testing a latent class model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 141-146.
22. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1996). The experience of work and turnover intentions: The interactive effects of value attainment, job satisfaction, and positive mood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 318-325.
23. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Harris, M. M. (1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20, 737-756.
25. Jawahar, I. M., & Elango, B. (1998). Predictors of performance in software training: Attitudes toward computers versus attitudes toward working with computers. Psychological Reports, 83, 227-233.
26. Jawahar, I. M., & Stone, T. H. (1997). Appraisal purpose versus perceived consequences: The effects of appraisal purpose, perceived consequences, and rater self-monitoring on leniency of ratings and decisions. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 5, 33-54.
27. Jawahar, I. M., & Williams, C. R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50, 905-925.
28. Kane, J. S., Bernardin, J. H., Villanova, P., & Peyrefitte, J. (1995). Stability of rater leniency: Three studies. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 1036-1051.
29. Kane, J. S., & Kane, K. F. (1992). The analytic framework: The most promising approach for the advancement of performance appraisal. Human Resource Management Review, 2, 37-70.
30. Larkin, J. E., & Pines, H. A. (1994). Affective consequences of self-monitoring style in a job interview setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 297-310.
31. Longenecker, C. O., Jackson-Jaccoud, A., Sims, H. P., & Gioia, D. A. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative investigations of affect in executive judgment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 21-41.
32. Longenecker, C. O., Sims, H. P., & Gioia, D. A. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183-193.
33. Mayer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D. (1992). Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 671-684.
34. McIntyre, R. M., Smith, D. E., & Hassett., C. E. (1984). Accuracy of performance ratings as affected by rater training and perceived purpose of rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 149-156.
35. Murphy, K. R., & Balzer, W. K. (1989). Rater errors and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 619-624.
36. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Murphy, K. R., Herr, B. M., Lockhart, M. C., & Maguire, E. (1986). Evaluating the performance of paper people. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 654-661.
39. Napier, N., & Latham, G. (1986). Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 39, 827-837.
40. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Shaffer, D. R., Ogden, J. K., & Wu, C. (1987). Effects of self-monitoring and prospect for future interaction on self-disclosure reciprocity during the acquaintance process. Journal of Personality, 55, 75-96.
42. Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
43. Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 86-128). New York: Academic Press.
44. Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
45. Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.
46. Stone, E. F., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1989). Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 3-10.
47. Sulsky, L. M., & Balzer, W. K. (1988). Meaning and measurement of performance rating accuracy Some methodological and theoretical concerns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 497-506.
48. Tziner, A. (1999). The relationship between distal and proximal factors and the use of political considerations in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 217-231.
49. Tziner,. A., Latham, G. P., Prince, B. S., & Haccoun, R. (1996). Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring political considerations in performance appraisal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 179-190.
50. Tziner, A., & Murphy, K. R. (1999). Additional evidence of attitudinal influences in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 407-419.
51. Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J., Beaudin, G., & Marchand, S. (1998). Impact of rater beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational contexts on appraisal quality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 457-467.
52. Villanova, P., Bernardin, J., Dahmus, S. A., & Sims, R. L. (1993). Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 789-799.
53. White, J. W., & Gerstein, L. H. (1987). Helping: The influence of anticipated social sanctions and self-monitoring. Journal of Personality, 55, 41-54.
54. Zaccaro, S. J., Craig, B., & Quinn, J. (1991). Prior absenteeism, supervisory style, job satisfaction, and personal characteristics: An investigation of some mediated and moderated linkages to work absenteeism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 24-44.